Myth of Moderate Islam! Kerala offers insight.

One still should be wondering how so many Muslims and Islamic organizations can not perceive Islam as a religion of peace and it is all for co-existence? Or is it that Islamic scholars, Koran and Allah are having real difficulty in convening the message of peace to world wide Muslim community, Ummah? Why was this understanding of Islam teaching peace and tolerance such a abysmal failure among Ummah?

Child marriage in Islam and evil of Ruhollah Khomeini

Courtesy: faithfreedom.org (Must watch video.)


I mentioned that all knowing god Allah does not prescribe minimum age for marriage for girls or boys. He literally tells that men can marry and divorce girls who are not pubescent (65:04).

Ruhollah Khomeini, father of Islamic revolution in Iran, has infamously said that Muslim men can marry baby girls of few hours and they even can enjoy these babies sexually without penetration until the girl reaches age of 9. Well he even practiced it; Watch this video at faithfreedom.org:

http://www.faithfreedom.org/videos-features/khomeini-sexually-assaulting-crying-and-screaming-4-year-old-girl-with-parental-consent/

website's admin rightfully observes:

' This sickening story is not about Khomeini. It is about Islam. It is a demonstration of how humans cease to be humans when they believe in evil ideologies.
Khomeini asks a father to let him have temporary “marriage” with his 4 years old daughter and this benighted man consents. The child screams when that beast rapes her and her father does not intervene.
What can reduce a person to such a zombie? Only blind faith! He does not see anything wrong in that because his prophet did the same. Khomeini did not see anything wrong in that either for the same reason.
Doesn’t Islam reduce humans into beasts?
If a Muslim is capable of such cruelty to his own little girl, why he should not murder others if his prophets tells him to? '

P.S.

Ayatollah Khomeini writes (here): "A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby.  However, he should not penetrate vaginally, but sodomising the child is acceptable.  If a man does penetrate and damage the child then, he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life.  This girl will not count as one of his four permanent wives and the man will not be eligible to marry the girl’s sister…  It is better for a girl to marry at such a time when she would begin menstruation at her husband’s house, rather than her father’s home.  Any father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in heaven.

OR one can read from here about his legal observations on women, marriage and Islam:


A Selection from "Resaleh" (Towzih ol Masael) Book of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini:

I. A woman may legally belong to a man in one of two ways; by permanent marriage or temporary marriage (Siqeh). In the former, the duration of the marriage needs not to be specified; in the latter, it must be stipulated, for example, that it is for a period of an hour, a day, a month, a year, or more.

II. A man can marry a girl younger than nine years of age, even if the girl is still a baby being breastfed. A man, however is prohibited from having intercourse with a girl younger than nine, other sexual acts such as foreplay, rubbing, kissing and sodomy is allowed. A man having intercourse with a girl younger than nine years of age has not committed a crime, but only an infraction, if the girl is not permanently damaged. If the girl, however, is permanently damaged, the man must provide for her all her life. But this girl will not count as one of the man's four permanent wives. He also is not permitted to marry the girl's sister.

III. A father or a paternal grandfather has the right to marry off a child who is insane or has not reached puberty by acting as her representative. The child may not annul such a marriage after reaching puberty or regaining her sanity, unless the marriage is to her manifest disadvantage.............

Divorce in Islam and Triple Talaq.

In one of articles I wrote here I mentioned that Muslim women boast that Islam gives right to divorce to Muslim women. It is a joke. Among four major schools of  Islamic thought in Sunni Islam, only in Hanafi school women are permitted to start proceedings of divorce. This is only in theory as law makes it extremely difficult for Muslim women to divorce their women.

And all that a Husband has to do is to say talaq three times to divorce his wife. Women simply does not have this luxury.

One Islamic scholar writes, "According to Islamic laws, husband alone enjoys the right to divorce his wife; the wife has no such right. The Principle of Mohamedan Law by Mr M Hidyatullah—the former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India (Tripathy, 1980, p-324)—in this regard, says, “Whenever the husband utters the word talaq thrice, the divorce becomes effective at that instant, irrespective of place and time.”"(Must read article to understand how Islam treats its women by Radhashyam Brahmachari.)

He also wrote another fine article (again, must read article to understand Islamic position on women) where he mentions what is happening in Islamic society in India; I read this when it was posted at islam-watch.org; I myself found it difficult to believe but I knew what he wrote was true. One of the incidents from many he mentioned is:

(Talaq by sending Telegram) The Calcutta edition The Times of India, a renowned English daily, reported on May 11, 2007, that a Muslim man called Mohammad Tazim Khan Lone from Ghaziabad, UP, had divorced his wife Abida Khatun by sending a telegram. In the telegram, the word ‘talaq’ was written thrice. At that time, Abida was staying at her father’s house in Delhi. The telegram also said that Abida could collect alimony amount, dowry items and iddut from Tazim Khan Lone. But Abida refused to accept the divorce and decided to move the case in the court of law.

But the finest evidence to this kind of Islamic law giving so called non existent rights to women is published by secular news paper itself, The Times of India.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/lucknow/Talaq-joke-on-Skype-ends-marriage/articleshow/6818970.cms

{Talaq is no joke. An e-savvy Qatar resident learnt this the hard way when he typed talaq thrice while chatting with his wife on Skype. He says he did not mean it but Dar-ul-Uloom Deoband has ruled that his nikah stands terminated.

That's not all. For his careless 'chat', the man can remarry his divorced wife only after halaala, a practice under which the woman has to marry and divorce another man before she can marry her previous husband again.

Deoband's fatwa section — Dar-ul-Ifta (DuI) — recently received a written request from Qatar, seeking a fatwa on a rather amusing situation. The youth stated that he was recently chatting with his wife on Skype when he typed the word 'talaq' three times, though he did not mean it and asked if his nikah was still valid.

Dar-ul-Ifta shot back that the nikah stands terminated. "When you pronounce talaq three times, it means talaq has taken place, and it does not matter whether the woman has reciprocated or not. Your wife has become 'haraam' for you whether you are aware of the commandment of Islam or not. You neither have the right to take her back nor solemnise new nikah with her without a valid 'halaala'. After the completion of 'iddah' (iddat) period, the woman can marry where she wishes except you," the seminary said.

As per senior Islamic scholars, 'halaala' requires the woman to complete her iddat period of 40 days beginning immediately after talaq. During this period she is supposed to stay away from celebrations and socialising.

At the end of iddat, she would have to marry another man who should then divorce her. She will be required to go through another round of iddat only then would she be eligible to marry her "first husband".}

Wait, it is not over and it is much worse in reality. Better read it from Sharia law it self, The Reliance of Traveller; Manual of Islamic Jurisprudence of Shafi'i school of Islamic Jurisprudence which is approved by Al-Azhar University, the supreme authority in Sunni school of Islam:

*2*Chapter N7.0: Taking Back a Divorced Wife (Raj`a)
.......
.......
@N7.7
When a free man has pronounced a threefold divorce, the divorced wife is unlawful for him to remarry until she has married another husband in a valid marriage and the new husband has copulated (dis: p29) with her, which at minimum means that the head of his erect penis fully enters her vagina. 

What this master piece says is that if the wife wants to remarry her first husband after triple talaq then she should not only marry another guy but she should even have sex with her second husband before she divorces and marries her first husband.

If one is trying to find logic in all this then they are wasting time because this kind of rules directly come from Koran (here) and Sunna (here). Any way, Muslims themselves are not going to question this kind of illogical law because Allah knows every thing and Muslim women continue to be proud by saying that Islam gives right to women to divorce , which does not exist in reality.

I repeat: Islam is founded by a really demented man; this is the plain truth.

'Popular Front of India' boasts about its Jihad to make India an Islamic country

Should the constitutional right of freedom of religion and freedom to propagate their religion mean that some groups based on religion (Islam, of course) have the right to instill Sharia law (Islamic law) - where in all non-Muslims are treated as second / third / fourth class citizens - as the law of this country i.e. to turn India in to an Islamic country?

Recently, Kerala CM, Achutanand, has said that Popular front of India (PFI) is highly communal and wants to make Kerala state Muslim majority state. His observation is based on pamphlets seized by Kerala police. Even this legitimate and harmless comment regarding PFI is considered as an insult to an entire Muslim community by opposition leader Mr Chandy (here or here).

So, there is nothing wrong in Muslim organizations to commit atrocities and to declare their Islamic fascist aims openly but it is expression of hate against Muslims and insult to Muslims if one reports and comments on such subversive activities. No wonder then, fascist organization like PFI  become more bold in pursuit of their fascist aims (here):
{{{    

The Popular Front of India (PFI) has claimed that the outfit is way ahead of other Muslim organisations in Kerala in converting non-Muslims to Islam.

The PFI conducted a study a few years ago to find out how effective is the Da’wa work (propagation of Islam among non-Muslims) in Kerala by the Muslim organisations. It prepared a questionnaire and sent it to the organisations concerned as a part of the study. The Jama’at-e-Islami, however, did not cooperate with the venture.

The study concluded that the Muslim organisations, which claim that they are actively engaged in Da’wa work, are spending only a negligible part of their time, energy and fund for the propagation of Islam among non-Muslims.

Only less than 10 percent of their work is addressed to non-Muslims. The study conducted by the PFI found out that there are over 700 books in the market on Islam, published by various Muslim organisations. Islamic Publishing House (IPH), run by the Jama’at-e-Islami, tops in publishing books on Islam. But, according to the PFI, only 5 percent of these books are meant for non-Muslims. Over 99 percent of the mammoth public meetings organised by the Muslim organisations do not make any sincere attempt to have personal contact with non-Muslims to invite them to  Islam, says the PFI study.

Mounathul Islam, in Ponnani and Tharbiyathul Islam in Kozhikode are the two institutions that help new converts learn the ways of Islam, but those who go there annually are only in hundreds, which is very negligible compared to the actual population of Kerala.The PFI claimed that as many as 50 percent of those who join Islam in Kerala are through the Sathya Sarani, the centre for new converts set up by the organisation in Manjeri.

}}}    

Islamic Jihad is not Fiction (Al-Qaeda's letter).

What if President Obama makes peace with Osama? What if India vacates Kashmir? What if Russia moves out from Chechnya? There will be peace and no more terrorism in this world. Many people think in this fiction and some even write wonderful pieces in their blogs. But like it is said, it is pure fiction. We hear from Islamists in deception that Islam forbids killing innocent people. But when Muslim terrorists do killing, then they are declared non Muslims. These terrorists have very much said many times what and why they were fighting for and they even have quoted verses from Koran in their support. It is just us who are blind and let ourselves to be taken for by Muslims who have same ambitions like terrorists but a  different weapon.

Nakhla Raid; Highway Robbery.

In the year 622 AD, prophet Mohammad along with his followers numbering less than 150 migrate to present day Medina, called Yathrib in those days,  situated about 250 miles north of Mecca. Muslims say that prophet and his followers were persecuted by people of Mecca, mainly, pagans of Quraysh, just for following their new religion i.e. Prophet and his followers were completely innocent. Once they settled in Medina, what was the occupation of Prophet and his noble companions to earn their living? The answer is high way robbery.

Religious Minorities in Islamic countries (Bangladesh)

It will be a repetition if I write here about what Islamic theology says about Non Muslims and how Sharia law treats or how Islamic law is supposed to treat Non Muslims. The truth is, this treatment is not just confined to books; it happens in real world. One only has to look at any Islamic country and go through its constitution to find about Islamic tolerance. If an Islamic country says it is secular in constitution then read the news about how various Islamic organizations commit violence against religious minorities e.g. Indonesia. Actually it must be sufficient to point out that charter of Organization of Islamic countries on human rights says that they do not believe in UN mandated human rights and their constitutions will be based on Sharia law (here and here).

Media lost its relevance.

Indian media, esp. English, which arrogated itself in to thinking that their views represent what is the best for this country might be needing this kind of reaction, a Journalist beaten by Muslim mob for asking questions, here it is an unfortunate and brave Urdu Journalist, more often so that it could come out of its self created cage i.e. never report anything that is unfavorable to Muslims and Islamic interests esp. when radicals are involved. But it gets more unlikely from now that our secular Journos will ever put inconvenient questions to self styled representatives of Muslims. Present day definition of secularism is all about tolerating Islamic intolerance and violence.

Hate towards Non Muslims is intrinsic part of Islamic Faith: Al-walaa and Al-baraa.

Note: A picture is added to the original post.

It is often mentioned here that hating disbelievers is intrinsic part of faith of Islam. Koran makes it clear that Non Muslims are followers of Satan and purely guided by their whims and who go astray in the pursuit. For this reason or for other resons, Allah hates and curses these Non Muslims, whose way of living is a potential threat, like seduction, to Muslims who are following the most righteous path. So when Allah hates Non Muslims, is it possible for Muslims to do opposite? Here comes the concept of Al-walaa and Al-baraa. Well it is better to know what it is about from an Islamic website rather than from an Islamophobe. And look at the below bus add put up by a Muslim Organization; what is really outrageous is the picture of dove in the ad, for when Prophet conquered Mecca the first thing he did at Kaa'ba was to break wooden Dove (Christian symbol representing Holy spirit; it is also symbol of peace with origins in Judaic and Christian theology.) with his hands. Even ignoring this, ad saying Love For All is a Islamic way of joke on Non Muslims.

Courtesy: http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com

Islam: One way Street.

Can Islam co-exist with others in peace and harmony and on the basis of equal rights? Can Islam ever integrate with the rest of world? The concept of Islamic peace with Non Muslims is already explained, here. Peace exists only when Muslims are in domination and others are subjugated. It is not insensible to look in to various Islamic beliefs and practices and see their very nature and to reach an opinion on these and about the purpose of these Islamic beliefs and practice.

Jihad as misunderstanders of Islam say.

In this politically correct environment, one even quoting a verse from Koran invites scathing criticism reflexively from media, politicians and people. The person doing this will be labelled as hate monger, Islamophobe and probably even a fascist. But how about learning about what is Jihad from an Islamic website? And see if they are saying if it is a spiritual struggle or a just defensive war.