No freedom in Islam, An Egyptian presidential candidate says

As media created Euphoria over Arab Spring - all those upheavals and uprisings against dictators in Arab countries - settles, the recent developments like winning of Islamic parties in elections in countries like Tunisia, Morocco and Egypt should drive home one message: Islamization is complete.

Not that outcome of Arab Spring could have been different from what is at present, the appalling thing in this entire episode is short memories our politicians and journalists, intellectuals and historians plus wishful thinking.

How did every one of above classes forget what happened in Iran in the year 1979?

How did they ever forget about Ayatollah Khomeini's split tongue? Every thing he did after assuming power was in contrary to what he said before the Iranian  revolution.

To understand one could read the following post put up in iranian.com some time ago.

Democracy? I meant theocracy! The most truthful individual in recent history    

If people still believe Khomeini was an exception and Islam can not be held responsible and Egypt will be different, we have a Presidential candidate giving a hint of how future of Egypt will be.

No Freedom in Islam, Says Egypt's Presidential Candidate  
{{{

Hazem Saleh Abu Ismail, Egypt's presidential candidate and a vocal supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood, has said that there is no room for personal freedom in Islam. 

In a recent television interview translated and reported by Jihad Watch, Ismail said that being a Muslim is like being a member of the military, where one has to go by a dictatorial code of conduct. 

"If you claim that Allah considers it your personal freedom, show me your reference? Nobody has ever said that - except for people have no understanding of Sharia," Ismail said. 

"If you join (military), then you are obliged to wear their uniform, to attend their classes, to attend the training with them and to obey their leader," Ismail said, comparing military rules to Islamic Sharia. 

Ismail asserted that he would enforce veil or Hijab for women under his presidency and that if a woman wants to abandon the veil, she should "change her creed". He said he is only obeying Allah, by imposing Islamic dress code. 

"You see, this is the difficulty; this is Islam. Does she want to be a Muslim and not obey Allah's rules? Let them (women) say so; that's all I ask; let them be honorable and just speak up."

............

}}}

A British girl tells her suffering at the hands of Muslim men

Sorry for not referring to those Muslim criminals by the word  'ASIANS' like media adopted.

As more and more types of Islamic jihad are unfolding, infidels are becoming more and more submissive - showing willingness to look other way - which is the real purpose of Islamic jihad.

So, what can people expect in this world, where in British Govt. completely surrendered by releasing an Islamic terrorist in the hope of Muslim terrorists not bombing London Olympics, when they read the story of this girl? Nothing!!

'I called him a b****** so he grabbed me by the throat and called me a white b****': Girl, 15, gives harrowing account of being passed around 'grooming gang' for sex  
{{{

• Teenager told court she was forced to have sex with 21 different men 
• She said the men made her feel 'scared and awful'
• 11 men on trial accused of a variety of sex offences against children including rape, trafficking and sex assault

A 15-year-old victim of a child sexual exploitation ring was 'grabbed by the throat' and called a 'white b****' when she refused to have sex, a court heard today. 

The girl is one of five alleged victims, aged as young as 13, who were 'shared' and 'passed around' by 11 men who all deny conspiracy to engage in sexual activity with children under the age of 16. 

One of the men, a 59-year-old defendant who cannot be named, also denies two counts of rape, aiding and abetting a rape, one count of sexual assault and an allegation of trafficking within the UK for sexual exploitation.

......................

}}}  

Muslim mob riot in Britain over ongoing trial over sexual jihad

Appeasement of supremacists or fascists is very unlikely to result in softening of Islam's ultimate goal of the whole world being ruled under sharia. Appeasement further emboldens Muslims to make  more aggressive demands resulting in more restrictions on freedom of conscience, freedom of religion and freedom of expression....

Coming to sexual jihad in Britain, there is hardly any broader condemnation of it from Muslim leaders and Muslim community in Britain. May be there was no need because British media, in eagerness to show how liberal and multicultural they are, never mentioned who really those criminals are. It used the word  'ASIANS' for  identifying Muslims as if Chinese, Hindus and Sikhs are also involved in those abominable crimes. Will ever media realize that it is a slur on Hindus and Chinese to use the word 'ASIANS' to identify Muslim rapists and child abusers.

As in most incidents involving Islam and Muslims, Muslim community feels there is nothing over Muslim men indulging in sexual jihad but the Govt. of infidels is wrong in arresting and subsequently putting those criminals on trial; so, we have Muslim mob rioting in Manchester .......

Even while reporting this incident, the news paper never really mentioned who those rioters are lest it offends Muslims or some one blames the media as 'Islamophobic'.

Mob of 200 youths pelt police with bricks and smash up shops 'in anger at on-going sex grooming trial'....
{{{

Police were pelted with bricks and other missiles last night as hundreds of youths went on the rampage. 

Takeaways were targeted in an evening of disorder understood to be linked to the on-going trial of a suspected grooming gang at Liverpool Crown Court. 

A mob of around 200 youths congregated in the centre of the Heywood area of Rochdale, Greater Manchester, last night as trouble began. 

One shop-owner told how he was abused by a group of youths , who called him a 'dirty b*stard'................

}}}

'Asian Gangs' of Britain in news again for abuse of British girls

Names of members of this 'Asian gang' are, huh ..., Kabeer Hassan, 24, Abdul Aziz, 41, Abdul Rauf, 43, Mohammed Sajid, 35, Adil Khan, 42, Abdul Qayyum, 43, Mohammed Amin, 44, Qamar Shahzad, 29, Liaquat Shah, 41, and Hamid Safi, 22........

Like in earlier cases, here too, all reported criminals are from one community yet, beaten and compromised media can not simply identify culprits for who they are.

Media never highlight the fact that these criminal monsters hold the belief that Western white women or Non Muslim women - or any one not wearing veil - are of loose morals as Koran tells good women are obedient, devout and wear veil.....and the fact that Muslim clerics issue fatwas to kidnap and rape infidel women ......and Koran sanctions Muslim men keeping unlimited number of sex slaves .....

More importantly, Muslims can declare war on infidels and express their goal of imposing Sharia on the world but, it doesn't make them guilty. Guilty are those who dare to report such activities and call those acts what they are really i.e. part of  Holy Jihad.

Eleven men 'plied girls of 13 with drink and drugs to use them for sex'  

MPs of Kuwait become Islamophobic and wanted to ban Churches and Temples

People who cite sacred Islamic law on places of worship of other faiths are labelled Islamophobic - having and creating unreasonable fear of Islam. With out ever offering evidence contradicting what Islamophobes say about Islamic laws, these sly Islamist spokesmen and their infidel helpers among media and secular intellectuals say Islamic law and secularism are compatible and Islamic law is much better than present day secular laws  in protecting religious minorities.

And Indian middle class readily believe such lies especially when they come from mouths of mafia henchmen in Bollywood.

But actual Islamic law neither allows construction of new places of worship nor allows infidels to repair and renovate the existing ones .... still, you see, Islam teaches tolerance.

Kuwaiti MPs call for ban on construction of churches  
{{{

A Kuwaiti parliamentarian is set to submit a draft law banning the construction of churches and non-Islamic places of worship in the Gulf state, it was reported at the weekend. 

Kuwaiti Member of Parliament (MP) Osama Al-Munawer announced on Twitter he plans to submit a draft law calling for the removal of all churches in the country. However, he later clarified that existing churches should remain but the construction of new non-Islamic places of worship should be banned.......... 

}}} 

Persecution of Ahmadis starts in India too

In Pakistan, Ahmadis are killed. Their mosques are bombed. Ahmadis are charged with blasphemy laws occasionally.

The Govt. of Pakistan has made numerous laws legalizing institutionalized discrimination against Ahmadis.

The situation for Ahmadis in Bangladesh is no different.

Recently, even Indonesia -supposedly secular in law - started persecuting Ahmadis and even mobilized an army against them.

Still, Islam teaches tolerance!!. Islam is the religion of peace!!!

Since, India is not an Islamic state - not yet - Muslims here started using other means to persecute Ahmadis; the most effective means are - besides violence and threats - using infidel Governments to their bidding. Muslim leaders and Mullahs knew very much that politicians are willing to accommodate all their demands, however obnoxious they are and media too is completely compromised.

Of-course, the demands from Muslims community and its leaders will only get more and more aggressive as their numbers grow with time.

Contrary to wishes of many liberals in media, so called fundamentalist Islam giving way to liberal and more moderate Islam, Islam becomes more intolerant and violent. If some one wants proof, they just have to look at the election results in Arab countries, where in  so called fundamentalist Islamic parties have won the elections.

The simple reason for this is there is nothing like fundamentalist Islam nor moderate Islam. There is just 'Islam' like Mr. Erdogan, PM of Turkey, declared.

Ahmediyas to lose properties

Now the big question is how politicians, fake intellectuals, pseudo secularists and media react? Will they support Ahmadis on basis of their cherished ideology of secularism thus, opposing Muslim fundamentalists or they show how inept and stupid and clueless they are for nth time?

P.S. First the Ahmadi, Then Everybody Else

An 'ignorant !' of Islam: Proud to kill in the name of Allah and Islam will rule the world one day

This is not me saying but a Muslim - who really read Koran - Umar Farouk -who recently was imprisoned for trying to kill 300 people by bringing down a plane on Christmas day, 2009.

But wait, didn't Sharukh Khan say Islam prohibits killing of innocent people?

Or, a blatant liar Ashghar Ali Engineer say Islam teaches tolerance and promotes pluralism?

Contradiction? Not at all if one understands who really is innocent according to Islam and system of Dhimma in Islam.

One can read more about this guy Umar from (here).

Underwear Bomber Abdulmutallab: "Proud to Kill in the Name of God"  

Some selective quotes:

Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab said that he was proud to kill in the name of God .......Today is a day of victory and God is great al Qaeda would one day be victorious, and that acts like his will continue until the righteous servants of Allah inherit the world.

Muslims ultimately conquering world was mentioned in Koran 3 times. So much for tolerance and promotion of pluralism.

Sexual Jihad in Europe

Six Muslim men in Britain are charged with sexual exploitation of a 14 year old girl. I am not sure how MSM in Britain reported this but when last time sexual jihad in UK came in to national focus, media has willfully chosen not to mention their religion i.e. Islam even when 21 out of 23 criminals are Muslims; instead media has referred to these criminals as Asians. Probably, media is sure of Asians like Chinese and Hindus and Sikhs from India not  protesting loudly (like Muslims do) nor detonating themselves for killing white folks. Being nice has its disadvantages.

Brierfield man sixth on ‘child exploitation’ charge  

To be fair to media in Britain, much of media in Europe too follows the same pattern i.e. never mention the identity of rapists - who really they are and refers to criminals (rapists) as Asians, like this is a race problem. By coloring this endemic rape in racial colors, liberal-leftists media simply is trying to put the blame on victims themselves.

It is obvious that Islam is the problem here as numbers do not lie.

100% of rapists in Oslo happened to be Muslims and there is alarming rise in number of rapes in recent years to such an extent that US embassy in Norway issued directives to its citizens not to walk alone in the streets during night!(here or here)

9 out of 10 rapists in the city of Stavanger (Norway) happened to be Muslims again (here).

In Sweden, years back, reports are that 82% of rape convicts are Muslims again.

Even then, reticence on part of main stream media to mention words 'Muslims' and 'Islam' in reporting, if they choose to report the incident, will only worsen the situation especially when Islamic Mullahs blame Non-Muslim women for getting raped because they are not wearing veil.

Worse, recently a Muslim man in Britain, who was convicted of raping women, boasted that he raped women because they were on the streets during nights (here).

But the overwhelming truth is Islam and its teachings. Islamic teachings are filled with disdain towards Non-Muslims; many Muslim men view white girls (Non-Muslim) as creatures without morals and values. Considering that humiliating Non-Muslims is intrinsic to Islamic law, there can be no better way to humiliate infidels than abducting and raping their women. More importantly and truthfully, from the time of prophet Mohammad itself Islamic practice of raping Non-Muslim women and abducting infidel women -later to become sex slaves - became a important part of Islamic jihad.

In the brilliant words of trencherbone:

Sexual Jihad - the need to degrade and humiliate the Infidels - provides the religious motivation for Islamic gang rapes and pedophile abductions. 

Sexual jihad, using rape and other forms of sexual humiliation and sadism, has been employed as a weapon of war against infidels since the time of Mohammed. Sexual jihad, including gang rapes and pedophilic abductions of Christian children, continues unabated wherever Muslims come into contact with infidels. 

Demoralising and humiliating the infidels by sexual degradation of both adults and children is one of the most repulsive tactics of Islamic supremacism.

If  some one can call me an Islamophobe or communal or fascist for writing all this, then they can read from here an Islamic cleric issuing a fatwa to Muslim men to abduct and rape Non-Muslim women. After all Koran sanctions it and Prophet Mohammad himself did it.

P.S.   Dr. Humayun Azad, a professor in Bangladesh, has written a book - “Pak Sar Zamin Sad Bad” - on what is being taught in madrassas in Bangladesh and he was attacked for this. He later died in Germany.

R.N. Datta has reproduced the following excerpts from it in his book -silent terror:

Shovanallah, there is no sin if you do jina (sex or rape) with the malaun women in this world. These women are nothing but war-booty (mai-e-ganimat). Whenever you feel like doing sex in this world, do it with the malaun women. Shovanallah, there is no sin in it and it is the process by which you have to drive them out of Bangladesh.” (pp-14)


Another lesson says, “We hate the malauns but not their women. Personally, I like the body-odour of the malaun women much. Whether they are Brahmins or Charals (A low caste), or Kaibartas (another low caste), their body odour is excellent. A highly intense, sweet mundane fragrance comes from their breasts, from the hairs of their armpit and thighs. The extremely sweet fragrance that comes from the sweat of their pubic-hairs makes me mad.”


Another lesson says, “I tell you to place your right at where your two thighs meet. Tell me what you find there?” Meanwhile the penis got erected. I asked again, “What you find there.” Learners, the tender adolescent boys said, “It is the penis sir.” Then I told them, “It is not the penis. It is a gun. It is an M-16 Gun that Allah has given to you. You have to push this Islamic gun into the wombs of as many malaun women you can. It is the law of jihad. Beside that you have to plunder money, all gold ornaments and other valuables of the malaun households.” The learners cried “Allahu Akbar.”


One can read the complete paper on this from here; one should directly go to the section named "How a Jihadi should deal with kafir Women:".....

'Honor' crimes in Islam: Two brothers in Pakistan kill their wives for loose morals

The killers were sure that they have not done anything wrong: 

‘Honour’ crime: Three women killed ‘for loose morals’  

Many other Muslims, who committed such crimes, also believed the same:

Honour killing: Suspect surrenders, ‘confident of acquittal’
{{{...Allah Bachaya has surrendered himself to Rohilanwali police after killing his sister in the name of honour but he is confident that he will be released in a matter of days.....}}}

In Canada, recently a Muslim man, Mohammad Shafia, along with his wife and son were convicted for killing his 3 daughters and his other wife because they choose to adopt to western culture; he raged, "God's curse on them for generations. May the devil ...(expletive) on their graves. Is that what a daughter should be? Would a daughter be such a whore?.......There can be no treachery, no violation more than this........They committed treason from beginning to end. They betrayed humankind. They betrayed Islam...They betrayed everything.(here)".

The connection , here, to Islam is clear. Yet, the way media reported this incident, disgust is a lesser word to describe this kind of reporting (here), has no mention of how his Islamic faith influenced his decision.

If, for a moment, one forgets 'honor killings' in Islam, it is worth recalling that Koran states that men are guardians of women and sanctions husbands beating their wives. Koran literally states that women are half the worth men are by equating testimony of two women with testimony of one man. And also, daughters inherit only half the inheritance of sons. Women have no right what so ever to start proceedings of divorce. And Prophet Mohammad said many other wonderful things of women. (Despite all these, US President Obama's adviser on Islam proudly declared that Muslim women equate Islam and Sharia law with gender justice.)

Against such background, it is not surprising to see that 90% of women in Pakistan are victims of domestic violence according to a human rights watch group (here and here).

The painful thing is - which is never accepted by leftists and liberals and Islamic apologists - that this violence can not be contained. Can a Pakistan's parliament pass a law criminalizing husbands beating wives? It might but, it will come with many 'ifs' making law ineffective. The simple truth is that any meaningful law directly confronts with Koran as it sanctions husbands beating wives.

Confounding all this sanctioned low status of women is women are majority of victims of honor crimes.

The topic of Honor killings in Islam is substantially covered in this blog(here).

Some high lights are: In the entire world, Islamic society accounts for 91% of honor crimes and Islam sanctions honor killings. Some years back, parliament of Jordan passed a law  recommending far less severe punishments and also leniency towards culprits in honor crimes.

The book THE RELIANCE OF TRAVELLER -  manual of Sharia law of Shafi'i school of Islam - which is also certified by Al-Azhar university,  the most important Islamic institution in Sunni Islam, to be authentic and a reliable guide book to Muslims living in western world says that Muslim parents can not be punished for killing their offspring:

The whole thing can be read and viewed from the book (of sharia law) itself at here.

Yet, some Muslim mullahs in Canada issued a fatwa saying there is no place for honor killings in Islam fearing that trial of Mohammad Shafia might force Non-Muslims to see the inherent truth of Islam. And, of course, media  assuredly, dutifully and happily reported this fatwa with out any question or explanation (here).

This is typical of Muslim behavior in Non-Muslim majority countries: lie blatantly about Islamic beliefs and customs and theology in furthering advance towards the ultimate Islamic goal of whole world being ruled under Sharia; even when Muslim majority states do exactly opposite with the claim of Koran sanctioning such behavior.

'Truly Asia' aka multicultural Malaysia can not understand that Islam professes freedom of religion!!

With more than 55% of population of Malaysia being Muslim, constitution of Malaysia has two sets of laws: one for Muslims and another for Non-Muslims.

And there are no prizes for guessing that set of laws for Non-Muslims is completely discriminatory when compared to laws for Muslims besides the obvious fact of Malaysia declaring Islam as its official religion. Muslim leaders of Malaysia openly support special privileges for Muslims and deride those who question this kind of institution of 'legalized' discrimination.

One aspect of all this is freedom of religion and freedom of conscience. By law, all ethnic Malays are declared Muslims and they have no right to convert to other religion (to be more accurate, a Muslim has to get permission from a Sharia court to change his religion and Sharia law sanctions death penalty to Muslim apostates; till now, there is no case of a Sharia court allowing a Muslim to change his identity.) But others can convert to Islam. Similarly, Muslims can proselytize but not others leading to ridiculous claims by Muslims i.e if a Muslim has converted to Christianity then he was enticed by Christians and if a Non-Muslim converted to Islam then he has seen justice in Islam. Only Muslims are capable of bragging about justice even in institutionalized discriminatory system.

Like sharia - which controls every aspect of Muslim's life - be it political, social, religious and legal - Malay's law too invades and interferes with every every aspect.

The strangest (more importantly it is very cruel) being how Muslim officials declare Non-Muslims as Muslims and seize their children. And following case illustrates this:

Federal Court avoids deciding on right to religion of choice.        

One can read also this kind of discrimination from here and here.

P.S. Malaysian Muslims out to stop 'the challenge of Christianization'  

Iranian court sentences a Muslim woman for converting to Christianity

Although authorities have cited other reasons like anti-Islamic activities and anti-state activities for her arrest, charging and punishment, the real reason is that she converted to Christianity as this is not the first such case nor will not be the last in Iran

Two years imprisonment is the punishment!!

But Islam pronounces death penalty for apostates (those who leave Islam to other faiths) as Prophet Mohammad, founder of Islam, said,"Kill any one who leaves Islam...".

Incidentally, all major Islamic schools thought in Sunni Islam and Shia award death penalty to Muslim apostates. Now is it that all these schools misunderstood Koran and its peaceful message of 'No compulsion in Islam ......' and 'Your religion to you and my religion to me' so profoundly.

Iranian Christian convert sentenced to two years in prison
{{{

A Christian convert whom security authorities arrested in her home was sentenced to two years in prison by the Revolutionary Court in Tehran. 

According to reports sent by reporters of Iranian Christian news agency, Mohabat News, Ms. Leila Mohammadi, a Christian convert who resided east of Tehran, was sentenced to two years of imprisonment after enduring 5 months of uncertainty in notorious Evin prison. 

Her trial was held on 18 January in Revolutionary Court in Moalem street where she was charged with "collaboration with foreign-dependent groups, broad anti-Islamic propaganda, deceiving citizens by formation of what is called a house church, Insulting sacred figures and action against national security." However she was acquitted of collaboration with foreign-dependent groups because the judge believed she had done that unintentionally. For the other charges she was sentenced to two years in prison and the ruling was delivered to her. 

After the verdict was issued knowledgeable sources reported that her attorney announced that the case was sent to the high court of Tehran province to be reviewed. 

Leila Mohammadi, was arrested after a number of security agents raided her home on 30 July, 2011 at 10:30 P.M. in Kianshahr town, east of Tehran. The agents thoroughly searched her house and also confiscated some of her belongings. 

Ms. Mohammadi was taken to Horr custody center which belongs to the Iranian police forces. From there, she was transferred to Evin prison. On 28 December 2011, she was released on a bail of 150,000 USD after 74 days in harsh conditions in solitary confinement in Evin prison.
It is being reported that some other people were also arrested in relation to this case. According to this report, some days after Ms. Mohammadi's arrest, another person called Parviz G. was also arrested by security agents. Again, in this case they thoroughly searched Parviz G's house and seized his belongings including his computer. He was freed after spending three days in Evin custody center and being subjected to interrogations and signing a disclaimer. It seems that his arrest was related to evangelical activities of his wife "Masoumeh" who was linked to the case of Leila Mohammadi.

}}}