May be 'secular HINDUS' can explain, if Islam teaches tolerance, how Muslims in Pakistan read hatred in schools

US COMMISSION REPORT :  80%+ of Pakistani Teachers View Non-Muslims as Enemies



Did any one hear the first sentence? Any way, I will write down:

"Hindus are enemies. Sikhs are bigger enemies...... And who ever is not a Muslim is an enemy of Pakistan. These are the things being thought in 8th standard text books."

Pakistan is a self declared Islamic state.

Any way, how come they teach such things? Where did they get such ideas? The answer is simple, but no one wants to listen. The answer is not 'MARS'. It is KORAN.

Those teachers are teaching Koran simply. There is no shortage of verses in Koran that tell Muslims that Non-Muslims are enemies of Islam, Non-Muslims are inferior and Muslims superior and Non-Muslims are perverts and vermin like.

Some examples:
2:98: .......surely Allah is the enemy of the unbelievers.
48:29: Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves...........
66.9:  Prophet! Strive hard against the Unbelievers and the Hypocrites, and be firm against them. Their abode is Hell,- an evil refuge (indeed).
49.7: .......Allah has endeared the Faith to you, and has made it beautiful in your hearts, and He has made hateful to you Unbelief, wickedness, and rebellion: such indeed are those who walk in righteousness;-
98.06:   Those who reject (Truth), among the People of the Book and among the Polytheists, will be in Hell-Fire, to dwell therein (for aye). They are the worst of creatures.

I can just go on adding this kind of verses. If one cares to look at 49.07, it says Allah has already made Muslims to hate 'some one' not believing in Islam. Is there any one who tells this is tolerance?

If we go on listening to the above video, at one point, one finds that Muslims are even told Hindus and Sikhs (generally all Non-Muslims) are unclean. From where did they get that idea?

Once again it is Koran which tells all idolaters are unclean in the verse 9.28:  O you who believe! the idolaters are nothing but unclean...............

One can even refer to an Islamic website which classifies all Non-Muslims among impure things ( here  or here): The 9 things are impure and unclean - to be avoided by Muslims:

1. urine;
2. stool;
3. semen;
4. blood;
5. corpses;
6. dogs;
7. pigs;
8. kafir;   ---  (Non-Muslim)
9. intoxicating liquids.

Is there anything in the above that can be referred to as tolerance? More over, all things I mentioned here are like a tip of iceberg.

PAKISTANI TEXT BOOKS ARE SAYING THOSE BECAUSE KORAN SAYS THOSE THINGS.

No wonder then, religious minorities in Pakistan or in any Islamic country are just disappearing.

Now, what makes any secular and liberal Hindus think Indian Muslims do not despise Non-Muslims in India? Are they following a different Koran? Even Madhaab is same i.e. Hanaafi. Even the schools of thought are same for India and Pakistan e.g. Barelvi and Deobandi.

More horrible is, propagators of India-Pakistan relations insist on both the countries exchange their text books for cultural enrichment as part of improving bilateral relations. Yes, Hindus should hate and despise themselves, probably it is their wish. And at one level there is not much difference between their text books and our text books as syllabus in our text books has already glorified mass murderers from Akbar to Aurangazeb to Tipu Sultan and called period of enslavement of Hindus as golden period in India.

Much worse is Hindus going to those shrines of Sufis - who are actually mass murderers and hate preachers against Hindus - to pay their respects. Hindu civilization is being denied of critical faculties by which they can differentiate between good and bad.

If there is a place on this earth where insanity dominates sanity, it is India.

NOTE: 'SECULAR Hindus' in the title does not refer to Hindus voting for Congress or other Non-BJP party. I have no political affiliations. It refers to decision makers at the highest level and those influencing the decisions i.e. opinion makers and 'so called' enlightened and intellectual people appearing the media.