Sexual abuse and raping of British Girls by Muslim Men.

How long Non Muslims esp. politicians and media will deny the reluctance on part of Islamic world and Muslims to live on equal terms? This continual denial of Islam’s desire to dominate every other will extract a heavy price. It appears that no crime committed by UK Muslim men is sufficiently heinous to wake British up from their slumber to comprehend existential threat their civilization faces from Islamic fascism. It even seems their (British) institutions have colluded to conceal a crime wave of massive proportion, rooted in Islamic imperialism and attitude towards Non Muslims, from ordinary citizens.

Islam is all about humiliating infidels; after all to feel superior, as Koran tells Muslims they are superior, one has to humiliate and abuse others. In Islamic theology, if a kafir is not to be killed then he should suffer the humiliation; that is what Sharia law does.

One of many ways of Muslims humiliating infidels is by sexually abusing and raping infidel women (Hindu women in Bangladesh or here). Enslaving and raping infidel women is an age old cherished practice of Islam and Muslims; Islam's Prophet himself raped infidel women after taking them as prisoners.

In present day world, there is no need of war as infidels have concepts like liberalism and multiculturalism. With political correctness giving cover to Islamic arrogance, Muslims demand that to avoid afflicting Muslim men with desires, attractions and passions women need to wear veils; Or else, it is not the fault of Muslim men if they rape kafir women; we have seen Islamic clerics openly declaring that it is the fault of kafir women for not wearing veil ( here, here, here and here).

When Jack Straw, former secretary, while responding to exploitation (rape and sexual abuse) of British white girls by Pakistani men, expressed ‘serious concerns’ about behavior within British Pakistani community, it elicited usual responses from Muslims and others with charges like stereotyping entire community, inflammatory and pretty dangerous but not one honest review or condemnation of behavior of Muslims.

I did cover this episode of sexual abuse by Muslim men in Britain. But I feel that it did not give true picture of magnitude of this endemic for I mentioned just one city while this kind of Islamic predatory sexual attitude towards Non Muslim women was prevalent in most of Northern England.

To understand the extent of this sexual abuse of white women, it is better to read available news from all three cities i.e. Yorkshire, Manchester and Derby. The way this news was reported hardly helps in understanding true magnitude of problem for, these reports neither mention place nor period nor identity of criminals properly and it is easy to get confused. Precisely for this reason, the news reports are arranged city wise in below presentation.

Case 1: Manchester.(Sources: here and here and here; Date: 04/08/2010)
{{{
Here, the victim is a 14 year old girl who was having troubles with her parents who adopted her when she was baby.

She was praised for giving testimony in a court; Superintendent Paul Savill of Greater Manchester Police commended her bravery and said: 'this young girl has been through an absolutely horrifying ordeal.’  'The level of abuse she has suffered is almost beyond belief. She has been treated like a commodity - beaten, threatened and sexually exploited.'

Nine men ages 25 to 33 – Asad Hassan, Mohammed Basharat, Mohammed Khan, Ahmed Noorzai, Mohammed Anwar Safi, Aftab Khan, Abid Khaliq, Mohammed Atif and Najibullah Safi — were convicted in this case.

Now aged 17, she said, “These people exploit young girls. They feed them drugs and alcohol and tell them they love them. I know because it happened to me and it has changed my life enormously.”
}}}

At this point, nothing much was said about the extent of problem. Despite the fact that all convicts are Muslims, every one was talking in terms of race like mentioning criminals as Asian gang.

Case 2: Yorkshire (Sources: here and here , Date: 04/11/2010)
{{{ (In this case I am just quoting from the report.)

Five British-born Pakistanis have been jailed for abusing white girls as young as 12.

The 'sexual predators' preyed on their victims over several months and threatened them with violence if they refused their advances.

One of the men branded his victim a "white bitch" when she resisted, while a second smirked, "I've used you and abused you." 

The men attacked the four girls in play areas, parks and in the back of their cars, Sheffield Crown Court heard. They gave them gifts and introduced them to their friends. The girls were abused so frequently that after many months it "became a way of life".

The girls, who were being monitored by social services, were eventually rescued by police and removed from their homes amid growing concerns for their safety.

Two of the men wept in the dock as they were jailed.....

The five, Umar Razaq, 24, Razwan Razaq, 30, Zafran Ramzan, 21, Adil Hussain, 20, and Mohsin Khan, 21, were found guilty of a string of sexually related offences against the girls, one aged 12, two aged 13 and one aged 16. 

Ramzan was found guilty of raping the 16-year-old girl in her own home, and the other four were found guilty of sexual activity with a child.

Umar Razaq was jailed for four and a half years, while the judge gave Razwan Razaq 11 years.

Ramzan was jailed for nine years, and Hussain and Khan both received four years. All five were placed on the sex offenders' register. Three further men were cleared.

The attacks took place in Rotherham, South Yorkshire, during 2008, the court was told. Khan, a mortgage adviser who owned a BMW, described his victim as a 'little stick' who looked as if she had not reached puberty.

}}}

The fact that I am using report from a Indian News paper suggests the nature of reporting of British news papers. This does not glorify Times of India as it has not reported such incidents committed by Indian Muslims in West Bengal; in fact no Indian Media entity did. May be they think that Indian Muslims are different like they have different Koran and a different Prophet.

Case 3: Derbyshire (Sources: here )
{{{
This is how dailymail journalist reports:

An Asian gang of 'sexual predators' cruised city streets for girls as young as 12 - usually white - who were then plied with drink and drugs and raped or abused.

Up to 100 ‘vulnerable’ girls may have been groomed, abused or supplied cocaine by married fathers Abid ­Saddique and Mohammed Liaqat, and their friends.

A court heard the pair used Liaqat’s BMW saloon to trawl for victims, pulling up alongside girls outside shops or schools and chatting them up before a ‘campaign of calls and texts’ to groom them.

Saddique, 27, and Liaqat, 28, plied the ­victims - most from broken homes - with vodka and cocaine before taking them to ‘parties’ in hotels or flats with other gang members to rape or degrade them.....

Seven other guilty members of the gang have already been jailed.

One of 26 alleged victims concerned in the gang’s trials was a 14-year-old straight-A student from a middle-class home........Detective Inspector Sean Dawson said that although all of the victims were white except for three mixed-race girls and two Asians, the men were ‘out for whatever sex they could get’ and did not care what race their victims were. The oldest victim was 18 but most were aged between 14 and 16.....The inquiry, called Operation Retriever, is the biggest child sex investigation ever conducted by Derbyshire Police. A total of 75 charges were brought against 13 suspects - all of Derby. Four were cleared.......................

One victim, who was raped in a car after being driven to a country lane by Liaqat and a second man, told how she was targeted aged 16 after telling the men she came from a broken home.

She said: ‘They would take you out, buy you ice creams and take you out for a lovely nice meal. And there’s part of you that thinks it’s really exciting and there’s part of you that thinks, “I have met this lovely nice man and he’s taking me out for a really nice meal”.

‘And there’s part of you that looks at these men as a father ­figure, as weird as it sounds, because you feel like they’re going to keep you safe and they then abuse every part of that.

She added: ‘They actually take advantage of the fact that no one does care about you really. They make you feel as if they’re on your side and that you are in a real relationship and they just abuse any feelings of love and caring about people. I think they’re evil. I just cannot understand what has made them so evil.’

One can read the full report from the link given above. So there are more than hundred victims and 9 criminals. Despite the fact that except for 3 all victims are of British origin, yet police officer says that victims are from all races as if this is a race problem. And again except for 2 out 9 all the convicts are of Muslims and Pakistani origin. Still, media uses the word Asian to identify and describe criminals.
}}}

In all above three cases, out of 23 convicts 21 were Muslims but media at the best referred to these people as Asians. Even cultural issue of attitude is sidelined completely as a reporter says (here):

And then there is a controversial, but relevant, cultural issue. Asian men of Pakistani heritage often believe white girls have low morals compared with Muslim girls. ‘They wear what they call “slags” clothing, showing much of their bodies and “deserve what they get”,’ an Asian social worker in the north of England has told me.

In fact much larger picture appears and daily mail reports (here). This same report equally condemns many institutions for concealing the crime and allowing the girls to be exploited thus, strengthening the axiom that sentiments of Muslims are more important than lives of children and young girls:

Police and social services have been accused of fuelling a culture of silence which has allowed hundreds of young white girls to be exploited by Asian men for sex.

Agencies have identified a long-term pattern of offending by gangs of men, predominantly from the British Pakistani community, who have befriended and abused hundreds of vulnerable girls aged 11 to 16.....

But researchers identified 17 court prosecutions since 1997, 14 of them in the past three years, involving the on-street grooming of girls aged 11 to 16 by groups of men. 

The victims came from 13 towns and cities and in each case two or more men were convicted of offences.

In total, 56 people, with an average age of 28, were found guilty of crimes including rape, child abduction, indecent assault and sex with a child. 

Three of the 56 were white, 53 were Asian. Of those, 50 were Muslim and a majority were members of the British Pakistani community. 

Those convicted allegedly represent only a small proportion of what one detective called a ‘tidal wave’ of offending in Yorkshire, Lancashire, Greater Manchester and the Midlands.

50 of 56 criminals are Muslims and yet no one is calling spade a spade. Interestingly Hindus and Sikhs have reported about this kind of incidents (here):

A day after UKs' former home secretary Jack Straw blamed some Pakistani Muslim men for targeting "vulnerable" White girls sexually, UK's Hindu and Sikh organizations also publicly accused Muslim groups of the same offence.

Interestingly, way back in 2003, a British member of  Parliament, has warned on this (here):

Ann Cryer, a former Labour MP for Keighley, she had been made aware of a problem in her constituency in 2003 after she was approached by about six mothers who said their daughters were being groomed for sex by Pakistani men.

She said she tried to intercede with the community by asking a councillor to speak to Muslim elders, but they said it was not their affair.

"Instead of drawing it to a conclusion then, it's drifted on, so it seems now every year we're getting more cases of very young, sometimes 12-year-old girls being abused by these gangs of men. I wish it would stop, I wish it would go away," she said.

When she can not identify the problem properly as she identifies the culprits as Asian which is a slur on Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists and Chinese, her wish remains as a wish. So finally it is only an islamaphobe, Melaine Philips, like me who tells the actual problem in dailymail:

Actually, there is more than a grain of truth in that particular criticism. For this is certainly not a racial issue. Indeed, one of the many red herrings in this debate is that - if cultural characteristics are discussed at all - the gangs tend to be described as ‘Asian’.

But this is to besmirch Sikhs, Hindus, ­Chinese and other Asians. For these ­particular gang members are overwhelmingly Muslim men. And the common ­characteristic is not ethnicity, but religion.

For these gang members select their victims from communities which they believe to be ‘unbelievers’ — non-Muslims whom they view with disdain and hostility.

You can see that this is not a racial but a religious animosity from the fact that, while the vast majority of the girls who are targeted are white, the victims include Sikhs and Hindus, too.

Back in 2007, The Hindu Forum Of Britain claimed that hundreds of 

Hindu and Sikh girls had been intimidated by Muslim men who took them on 

dates before terrorising them until they converted.

And the Sikh Media Monitoring group described ‘the deliberate and targeted sexual degradation of Sikh women purely because of their religion’ and how a minority of young Muslim men boasted about ‘seducing the Kaffir (unbeliever) women’. 

Nevertheless, there is a particular problem with white girls. They are targeted because the men involved in these offences do not regard Muslim girls in the same way as sexual objects to be shared by all. 

One Muslim man was reported as saying that white girls are targeted by such men because ‘if they did it to a Muslim girl, they’d be shot’. 

White girls also tend to be seen as sluts. Mohammed Shafiq, chief executive of the Ramadhan Foundation, a national Muslim youth organisation, says: ‘These people think that white girls have fewer morals and are less valuable than our girls.’

Those who have read Islamic doctrines understand that it is Islamic teachings that has made these 'monster' Muslims to act in the way they did. Because a kafir is nothing for these Muslims. When Koran says Muslims killing infidels is a lesser crime compared to that of infidels disbelief in Islam, sexual abuse and rape are nothing for these psychos. Even empirical figures from real world suggest that Islam's attitude towards Non Muslims will only be hostile and is of hatred and it remains like this.

Note: Latest on victims of these sexual attacks: I was kept prisoner by the Asian sex gang predator: Victim tells harrowing story of 'boyfriend' who dubbed his car the 'Rape Rover'.