Hindus in Pak. seek asylum in India; but will they get?

25% in 1947. 15% in 1950s. By the year 1998 Hindus in Pakistan were reduced to 1.6% of Pakistan's population. An Islamic achievement that Islamists boast about (read from here). But what is the present day population of Hindus in Pakistan? No one knows, however, with certainty one can say that it will be zero in the future. Or is it that Muslims of Pakistan love to have some of them in their country because to feel superior relative to Pakistanis need some infidels; I found that some Muslims are speaking for Hindus and are worried about their disappearance from Pakistan all together ( here; read comments and one can see stupidity if they are not naive.).

Does any one think this matters in this country? Should it matter? To talk about this kind in public will only hurt sentiments of Indian Muslims; our lefties and liberals love to say that it is against our principle of secularism. Yes, it is saffron terror that is threatening the social fabric of this country because it has already destabilized Pakistan.

A Pakistan's news paper reported that over two dozen Hindu families were seeking asylum in India (here). An Indian online news entity also reported this news.

Islamic pluralism; Malaysian style.

I keep writing here that Islam rejects other religions, concept of pluralism or multiculturalism and then I become an Islamaphobe. When Islamic organizations say this, people call these organizations extremists. If I mention these organizations are reputed in Islamic world, non militant and are part of Islamic main stream, people in these organizations are branded as ignorant forgetting the fact that these (so called ignorant) people spent all their life studying Islamic scriptures. We have a similar case again from tolerant and modern Muslim Malaysia (here).

Understanding Islamic extremism.

In my previous post I wrote that question of ‘is Islam a violent religion?’ is erroneous and misleading. In any system or ideology violence is not the end. Violence and terrorism are just means to achieve ideological goals. Islam is very much a political ideology; Islam is expansionist in both the aspects, as belief and as political ideology. So the right question to be framed for perusal or understanding is ‘Is Islam tolerant towards non muslims?’ or ‘Can Islam co-exist peacefully with others?’ or ‘What does Islam say towards infidels?’

Is Islam really the most violent religion? BJP(?) says no.

When insanity rules over sanity people can not even distinguish between stories and open commands to murder and genocide. In the age of post modernist world, objective thinking is discouraged and demonized. Reason is completely abandoned. As if this is not sufficient, we have political correctness creeping in to journalism and politics; both the professions are tainted by allures of power and money. So rationalism gives the way to irrationalism and we have a word like Islamophobia.

Jihad by tongue. Jihad by heart. Jihad by sword. And finally Jihad by procreation.

Is there any Indian political party or a social organization that dares to call for family planning among Muslims in India? When I looked at TFR's (Total Fertility Rate) in some Islamic countries, I was bit amazed. Because TFR in Iran is about 1.72 and is less than many European countries. In many Islamic countries, of course with exception of Saudi Arabia, TFR is coming down; probably Governments have realized that they do not possess such natural resources to sustain such a population growth rate. Take the example of Pakistan. TFR here has come down from more than 3.5 to around 2 in less than a decade. It is reported that it is second fastest country to bring down TFR in such a less time. In contrast to this, Muslims living in infidels countries like European nations and India (more than 3) have TFR close to 3. Why? Many reasons explain this: it is infidels who will be paying the cost and it also brings them closer to realize their grandeur delusional goal of Islam ruling the entire world. Read the below report:

Islamic morality and Afghan sex practices from wikileaks.

What do Muslims say about infidels esp. western cultures? They are morally corrupt as if Christianity and every other religion is encouraging lesbianism if not pedophilia because none can beat Islam in this regard with their own Prophet marrying 9 year old girl and Koran sanctioning child marriages. One of the documents of many leaked documents (wikileaks) say that extent of dual problems (lesbianism and pedophilia) is very high in Afghanistan that is 100% Muslim.

Harry potter actress was abused by her family for her friendship with a Non Muslim; Islam is fascist.

What was this young Muslim girl’s, famous for appearance in a popular movie series, crime? She is having a male friend from other faith, that too Hinduism.

I did this subject of honor killing, here, and in that post it is shown that Islam sanctions honor killings i.e. if parents kill their off spring for fear that their children are going against Islamic beliefs like by marrying outside their faith or converting to other religion then they can not be punished. What we have here is another case of typical Islamic imperialist and feudal mindset if not honor killing, and the victim here is Afshan Azad who acted in the role of Padma Patil in Harry Potter series. So, Afshan Azad can be considered lucky.

Punishment for Fornication (illegal intercourse or adultery) in Islamic law: stoning or flogging.

Iran was in news for sentencing a woman to death by stoning as she was accused of adultery and the punishment was suspended because of objections from Human Rights commission (here). Recently, it emerged that in Sudan each year 40,000 women are flogged for one or other supposedly moral crime (here):

Forty thousand women in Sudan are subject to police whippings for moral transgressions each year, a figure that came to light after a video was circulated on the Internet which showed the public thrashing of a Khartoum woman.

Sudanese feminist and political figure Mariam al-Sadiq al-Madi brought the issue to the attention of authorities, the Sudanese daily al-Sharq al-Awsat reported. The drama of the physical punishments against women in Sudan is much more serious than previously believed," al-Madi said. She said that each year around 600,000 lashes are dealt to women in Sudan.

There was even a case of a Bangladeshi woman dying of flogging (or lashing) she was subjected to (here) on the accusations of adultery. Constitution of Bangladesh is fairly secular but it is not going to stop Muslim moral police to inflict Islamic punishments. What is the proper punishment for adultery according to Islamic laws?

Jihad in the words of Syed Qutb; as in Milestones.

Syed Qutb, of Egyptian nationality, was a member and leader of Muslim brotherhood, the most powerful radical Islamic organization in the world today. In the year 1954, he was arrested on suspicion of complicity in the failed plot to assassinate, then, President of Egypt, Gamal Abdul Nasser and was sentenced to 25 years of imprisonment which was, later, reduced to 15 years. On health grounds, he was released in the year 1964. But his freedom was short lived as he was again arrested in the year 1965 on charges of treason and was sentenced to death along with two other members of Muslim brotherhood. President Nasser, realizing that Syed Qutb may be more dangerous in death than alive, offered mercy if Syed Qutb apologizes. Syed Qutb refuses; his sister, co-prisoner, requests him to save his life for the sake of Islamic movement. Syed Qutb disagrees and seems to have said, “Write the words. My words will be stronger if they kill me”. Finally he was hung in August, 1966. But what were his words?

While he was in prison, between years 1954 and 1964, he wrote letters to his kin and relatives on Islamic theology; in the year 1964 these letters were compiled in to a book under the title ‘Milestones’, sometimes referred to as Signposts. It was banned in Egypt; but it became a best seller in Arabic world and still remains one of the most important and influential Islamist documents produced in 20th century.

Here, I am just reproducing chapter 4 ‘Jihad in the cause of Allah’ of Milestones. I thought of presenting only some excerpts, but I realized that it might be confusing and work itself may not be satisfactory. It is not easy to complete reading in one sitting, so it would be advisable to read in 2 or 3 sittings. Nevertheless, I marked important passages in red color (as usual my comments will be in purple and italics.). Also below, I am explaining one Islamic concept (actually a phrase), I did explain in earlier posts, for making it easy for new readers.

Islam means submission. Muslims say Islam means peace, just for confusing infidels. Arabic word for peace is salam, which one can see when Muslims greet each other. Both Islam and salam have same root ‘silam (SLM)’, but this does not mean both also have same meaning. In the days of Koran being supposedly reveled to Prophet, there were no vowels in Arabic script. In fact the meaning of this can be checked from Koran it self as the verse 3:019 say.

Islam means submission to the will of Allah as it is in Koran. Koran is guidance to Muslim individuals and Islamic society as Allah in Koran says Muslims form one brotherhood, the verse 49:10. Muslims also have to judge people (rule according to Koran) by Koran i.e. Koran is a constitution for Muslim state (verses 5:47-49, 6:57, 6:62, 12:40, 12:67, 28:70, 40:12, 18:26, 12:80 and 11:45). That is the reason why Muslims have Sharia which is derived from Koran. In Islam, obeying laws also means worshipping those who made those laws (verse 9:031). If Muslims obey laws made by men, this accounts to worshipping some one else besides Allah and this amounts to rebellion against Allah. This is what Syed Qutb calls ‘servitude to men’; he argues, as it is laid in Koran, that sovereignty belongs to Allah alone as humans are only his slaves and slaves can not make laws for themselves as they are never sovereign. If people are following laws made by a king, it means they are worshipping that king; If people follow laws made by a democratic govt. they are worshiping a group of people who made those laws. Muslims call this oppression and tyranny; this is what Muslims mean when they say Islam only fights against oppression. In Islam, a govt. exists only to enforce law as it exists in Koran (Sharia) but not to make new laws. Since following man made law is called as oppression, Islam fights to free all man kind from this ‘servitude to men’ except God i.e. Allah, Syed Qutb explains.

In this 4th chapter, Syed Qutb starts with a quotation from an Islamic scholar; read on.

Did prophet Mohammad fight offensive wars? A Saudi Sheikh says Jihad means offensive war 'initially'.

We keep hearing from muslims that Mohammad, Prophet of Islam, never fought any war let alone an offensive war or that he fought only in self defense. This is pure deceit from muslims, of course, in conformity with Mohammad’s teaching that war is deceit. Veil is being removed on this concealment, about Prophet Mohammad being intolerant and instigator of armed strife, albeit slowly. There are some Muslims who perceived this and started out giving, occasionally, their own reasons like there were no treaties in those days or so that muslims can preach their religion in conquered places or it was pretty common practice to plunder caravans in those days which hardly amounts to defense.

Women with “seditious” eyes must cover up; You see, Muslim men are never at fault for attractions and rapes.

Of  course we have seen Muslim ulema saying that muslims men can not be faulted if they rape women who do not wear veil (here or here). But it looks like, wearing veil is not sufficient for women; it must be really getting difficult for muslim men to control their urges; at least Saudi police think this way and are saying that Women with “seditious” eyes must cover up.

Moderate Islam? A Saudi Journalist is pelted with stones for driving in a woman's dress.

Women can not drive in Saudi Arabia. Yes, it is few authorities in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia who misinterpreted Islam badly, but people are moderate Muslims and Islam is really kind and liberating for women!

Secularism vs. Islam; Qaradawi says Muslims can not reject Sharia for secularism.

The original definition of secularism is separation of Church from the Government; religious institutions have no part in decision making. Today, definition (or concept) of secularism has diversified and has attained more meanings. One popular definition implies that all people are equal before the law irrespective of their religion and secular law gives complete freedom to every individual to choose and propagate their own religion. Another definition of secularism is absence of belief in God; this opposes religion and religious institutions; this view is held by Marxists, liberals, so called enlightened people (pseudo intellectuals) and socialites (for me, this word means use less people.).

Secularism vs. Islam; Organization of Islamic Countries' Cairo Declaration and its hypocrisy.

Beginning in the 19th century and in to the 20th century, one political concept that has become dominant theme and has been accepted universally is notion of human rights. Other two significant political concepts are secularism and equality of all human beings.

Islam will conquer India and massacre Hindus, Zaid Hamid, a Pakistani Security Consultant, says.

Of course he will be dismissed as crack nut and we will be told that Islam is all about defensive Jihad and mutual co-existence! We have seen this kind of talk from many Islamic organizations, Indian or Pakistani based; but we have nothing to worry because these wanna be conquerers do not know real Islam.

URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cwvts8sZ5YE

Video:

Varanasi blasts have nothing to do with Ayodhya; it is about 'when sacred months have passed away, then fight and slay the idolaters where ever you find..'

So nation has seen another explosion in Varanasi and also usual reaction from our PM. We also saw some comical stuff even in moments of despair and grief for some people. Media is not very much different from past practice in reporting this kind of incidents. For now it looks like Indian Mujahideen is responsible for this; but it can change as our law enforcement agencies along with CBI can just produce any kind of results that our political establishment wants. The problem is media and of course, the religion of peace.

Malaysia truly 'Multicultural' Asia? Veil is removed; One can call it Islamic Imperialism.

Malaysia is often cited as an example of moderate and modern Islamic country and also considered as multiculturalist. Muslim population is about < 60% of Malaysia. It has two sets of laws; one for Muslims and another for Non Muslims. By the laws of Bhumiputra, all Malays are declared as Muslims.What if when laws from these two sets contradict each other? Sultan of Perak, Sultan Azlan Shah, answers this question very well. Hopefully now, this opens eyes of some dhimmis who used to show Malaysia as an example. Other important question is, is the Sultan an Muslim extremist for enshrining and supporting such discriminatory laws? The reason I write about Islam, Koran and Sunna is that Islam is a fascist political ideology; not entirely because of violence which most people attribute to Islam with out understanding Islamic beliefs at core. Violence or Jihad (violent) is just means to achieve Islamic superiority over others i.e. subjugating all Non Muslims. Violence towards Non Muslims is not the end but one of the means, which Islam and Koran sanction very much.
Courtesy: www.bernama.com

Explaining how Islamization takes.

This video, many people must have come across. In fact, the message in this video has been pointed out in comments in one of the posts here. But, still for the sake of completion and to help starters understand the depth of problem with Islam I am posting it here. (Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpM6QKaAgP0&feature=player_embedded#)

Muslim Women wearing Veil....

Why do Muslim women wear veil? Because Allah said so in Koran, verses 33:59 and 24:31. Apart from it, there is no other reason. The reason it sustains this Islamic practice is male chauvinism. Below video is funny and disgusting; some people might say this but it is also testimony to sorry state of women in some countries. Some might say Muslim women wear it voluntarily but there have been numerous reports from Europe suggesting that Muslim women are being forced to wear.

Multiculturalism: an euphemism to Islamization; endemic of rape from Muslim Men.

This post is a really mixture of many things with central theme being Muslim men's obsession with sex. To start with, Pat Condell explains how politicians and journalists, acting together, in Sweden have destroyed Sweden in the below video. He also mentions about rape endemic that is existent in Sweden but nevertheless denied by politicians.

Islamic Blasphemy Law as explained by an Islamic Website.

Well, may be people like me, Islamophobe, got it wrong on this Islamic law of blasphemy. But if one really feels this, they can learn from teachings of an Islamic website on this blasphemy law. You can either click on the link provided below or read from below which is simply pasted from the same website.

Courtesy: http://www.islam-qa.com/en/ref/22809

Blasphemy Law; It is very much a true Islamic law having basis in Koran and Example of Mohammad.

Is blasphemy law, whose lethality and repercussions are felt by religious minorities in Pakistan, UN-Islamic?

People who have come across the news of struggle of Asia Bibi who was sentenced to death on charges of blasphemy, insulting Islam, might think that blasphemy law has no basis in Islam and Islam stands against such laws  and punishments because media writes like this on advice or under influence from so called Muslim moderate intellectuals who wish that Islamic doctrines and laws still remain esoteric.