Hindus in Pak. seek asylum in India; but will they get?

25% in 1947. 15% in 1950s. By the year 1998 Hindus in Pakistan were reduced to 1.6% of Pakistan's population. An Islamic achievement that Islamists boast about (read from here). But what is the present day population of Hindus in Pakistan? No one knows, however, with certainty one can say that it will be zero in the future. Or is it that Muslims of Pakistan love to have some of them in their country because to feel superior relative to Pakistanis need some infidels; I found that some Muslims are speaking for Hindus and are worried about their disappearance from Pakistan all together ( here; read comments and one can see stupidity if they are not naive.).

Does any one think this matters in this country? Should it matter? To talk about this kind in public will only hurt sentiments of Indian Muslims; our lefties and liberals love to say that it is against our principle of secularism. Yes, it is saffron terror that is threatening the social fabric of this country because it has already destabilized Pakistan.

A Pakistan's news paper reported that over two dozen Hindu families were seeking asylum in India (here). An Indian online news entity also reported this news.

Islamic pluralism; Malaysian style.

I keep writing here that Islam rejects other religions, concept of pluralism or multiculturalism and then I become an Islamaphobe. When Islamic organizations say this, people call these organizations extremists. If I mention these organizations are reputed in Islamic world, non militant and are part of Islamic main stream, people in these organizations are branded as ignorant forgetting the fact that these (so called ignorant) people spent all their life studying Islamic scriptures. We have a similar case again from tolerant and modern Muslim Malaysia (here).

Understanding Islamic extremism.

In my previous post I wrote that question of ‘is Islam a violent religion?’ is erroneous and misleading. In any system or ideology violence is not the end. Violence and terrorism are just means to achieve ideological goals. Islam is very much a political ideology; Islam is expansionist in both the aspects, as belief and as political ideology. So the right question to be framed for perusal or understanding is ‘Is Islam tolerant towards non muslims?’ or ‘Can Islam co-exist peacefully with others?’ or ‘What does Islam say towards infidels?’

Is Islam really the most violent religion? BJP(?) says no.

When insanity rules over sanity people can not even distinguish between stories and open commands to murder and genocide. In the age of post modernist world, objective thinking is discouraged and demonized. Reason is completely abandoned. As if this is not sufficient, we have political correctness creeping in to journalism and politics; both the professions are tainted by allures of power and money. So rationalism gives the way to irrationalism and we have a word like Islamophobia.

Jihad by tongue. Jihad by heart. Jihad by sword. And finally Jihad by procreation.

Is there any Indian political party or a social organization that dares to call for family planning among Muslims in India? When I looked at TFR's (Total Fertility Rate) in some Islamic countries, I was bit amazed. Because TFR in Iran is about 1.72 and is less than many European countries. In many Islamic countries, of course with exception of Saudi Arabia, TFR is coming down; probably Governments have realized that they do not possess such natural resources to sustain such a population growth rate. Take the example of Pakistan. TFR here has come down from more than 3.5 to around 2 in less than a decade. It is reported that it is second fastest country to bring down TFR in such a less time. In contrast to this, Muslims living in infidels countries like European nations and India (more than 3) have TFR close to 3. Why? Many reasons explain this: it is infidels who will be paying the cost and it also brings them closer to realize their grandeur delusional goal of Islam ruling the entire world. Read the below report:

Islamic morality and Afghan sex practices from wikileaks.

What do Muslims say about infidels esp. western cultures? They are morally corrupt as if Christianity and every other religion is encouraging lesbianism if not pedophilia because none can beat Islam in this regard with their own Prophet marrying 9 year old girl and Koran sanctioning child marriages. One of the documents of many leaked documents (wikileaks) say that extent of dual problems (lesbianism and pedophilia) is very high in Afghanistan that is 100% Muslim.

Harry potter actress was abused by her family for her friendship with a Non Muslim; Islam is fascist.

What was this young Muslim girl’s, famous for appearance in a popular movie series, crime? She is having a male friend from other faith, that too Hinduism.

I did this subject of honor killing, here, and in that post it is shown that Islam sanctions honor killings i.e. if parents kill their off spring for fear that their children are going against Islamic beliefs like by marrying outside their faith or converting to other religion then they can not be punished. What we have here is another case of typical Islamic imperialist and feudal mindset if not honor killing, and the victim here is Afshan Azad who acted in the role of Padma Patil in Harry Potter series. So, Afshan Azad can be considered lucky.

Punishment for Fornication (illegal intercourse or adultery) in Islamic law: stoning or flogging.

Iran was in news for sentencing a woman to death by stoning as she was accused of adultery and the punishment was suspended because of objections from Human Rights commission (here). Recently, it emerged that in Sudan each year 40,000 women are flogged for one or other supposedly moral crime (here):

Forty thousand women in Sudan are subject to police whippings for moral transgressions each year, a figure that came to light after a video was circulated on the Internet which showed the public thrashing of a Khartoum woman.

Sudanese feminist and political figure Mariam al-Sadiq al-Madi brought the issue to the attention of authorities, the Sudanese daily al-Sharq al-Awsat reported. The drama of the physical punishments against women in Sudan is much more serious than previously believed," al-Madi said. She said that each year around 600,000 lashes are dealt to women in Sudan.

There was even a case of a Bangladeshi woman dying of flogging (or lashing) she was subjected to (here) on the accusations of adultery. Constitution of Bangladesh is fairly secular but it is not going to stop Muslim moral police to inflict Islamic punishments. What is the proper punishment for adultery according to Islamic laws?

Jihad in the words of Syed Qutb; as in Milestones.

Syed Qutb, of Egyptian nationality, was a member and leader of Muslim brotherhood, the most powerful radical Islamic organization in the world today. In the year 1954, he was arrested on suspicion of complicity in the failed plot to assassinate, then, President of Egypt, Gamal Abdul Nasser and was sentenced to 25 years of imprisonment which was, later, reduced to 15 years. On health grounds, he was released in the year 1964. But his freedom was short lived as he was again arrested in the year 1965 on charges of treason and was sentenced to death along with two other members of Muslim brotherhood. President Nasser, realizing that Syed Qutb may be more dangerous in death than alive, offered mercy if Syed Qutb apologizes. Syed Qutb refuses; his sister, co-prisoner, requests him to save his life for the sake of Islamic movement. Syed Qutb disagrees and seems to have said, “Write the words. My words will be stronger if they kill me”. Finally he was hung in August, 1966. But what were his words?

While he was in prison, between years 1954 and 1964, he wrote letters to his kin and relatives on Islamic theology; in the year 1964 these letters were compiled in to a book under the title ‘Milestones’, sometimes referred to as Signposts. It was banned in Egypt; but it became a best seller in Arabic world and still remains one of the most important and influential Islamist documents produced in 20th century.

Here, I am just reproducing chapter 4 ‘Jihad in the cause of Allah’ of Milestones. I thought of presenting only some excerpts, but I realized that it might be confusing and work itself may not be satisfactory. It is not easy to complete reading in one sitting, so it would be advisable to read in 2 or 3 sittings. Nevertheless, I marked important passages in red color (as usual my comments will be in purple and italics.). Also below, I am explaining one Islamic concept (actually a phrase), I did explain in earlier posts, for making it easy for new readers.

Islam means submission. Muslims say Islam means peace, just for confusing infidels. Arabic word for peace is salam, which one can see when Muslims greet each other. Both Islam and salam have same root ‘silam (SLM)’, but this does not mean both also have same meaning. In the days of Koran being supposedly reveled to Prophet, there were no vowels in Arabic script. In fact the meaning of this can be checked from Koran it self as the verse 3:019 say.

Islam means submission to the will of Allah as it is in Koran. Koran is guidance to Muslim individuals and Islamic society as Allah in Koran says Muslims form one brotherhood, the verse 49:10. Muslims also have to judge people (rule according to Koran) by Koran i.e. Koran is a constitution for Muslim state (verses 5:47-49, 6:57, 6:62, 12:40, 12:67, 28:70, 40:12, 18:26, 12:80 and 11:45). That is the reason why Muslims have Sharia which is derived from Koran. In Islam, obeying laws also means worshipping those who made those laws (verse 9:031). If Muslims obey laws made by men, this accounts to worshipping some one else besides Allah and this amounts to rebellion against Allah. This is what Syed Qutb calls ‘servitude to men’; he argues, as it is laid in Koran, that sovereignty belongs to Allah alone as humans are only his slaves and slaves can not make laws for themselves as they are never sovereign. If people are following laws made by a king, it means they are worshipping that king; If people follow laws made by a democratic govt. they are worshiping a group of people who made those laws. Muslims call this oppression and tyranny; this is what Muslims mean when they say Islam only fights against oppression. In Islam, a govt. exists only to enforce law as it exists in Koran (Sharia) but not to make new laws. Since following man made law is called as oppression, Islam fights to free all man kind from this ‘servitude to men’ except God i.e. Allah, Syed Qutb explains.

In this 4th chapter, Syed Qutb starts with a quotation from an Islamic scholar; read on.

Did prophet Mohammad fight offensive wars? A Saudi Sheikh says Jihad means offensive war 'initially'.

We keep hearing from muslims that Mohammad, Prophet of Islam, never fought any war let alone an offensive war or that he fought only in self defense. This is pure deceit from muslims, of course, in conformity with Mohammad’s teaching that war is deceit. Veil is being removed on this concealment, about Prophet Mohammad being intolerant and instigator of armed strife, albeit slowly. There are some Muslims who perceived this and started out giving, occasionally, their own reasons like there were no treaties in those days or so that muslims can preach their religion in conquered places or it was pretty common practice to plunder caravans in those days which hardly amounts to defense.

Women with “seditious” eyes must cover up; You see, Muslim men are never at fault for attractions and rapes.

Of  course we have seen Muslim ulema saying that muslims men can not be faulted if they rape women who do not wear veil (here or here). But it looks like, wearing veil is not sufficient for women; it must be really getting difficult for muslim men to control their urges; at least Saudi police think this way and are saying that Women with “seditious” eyes must cover up.

Moderate Islam? A Saudi Journalist is pelted with stones for driving in a woman's dress.

Women can not drive in Saudi Arabia. Yes, it is few authorities in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia who misinterpreted Islam badly, but people are moderate Muslims and Islam is really kind and liberating for women!

Secularism vs. Islam; Qaradawi says Muslims can not reject Sharia for secularism.

The original definition of secularism is separation of Church from the Government; religious institutions have no part in decision making. Today, definition (or concept) of secularism has diversified and has attained more meanings. One popular definition implies that all people are equal before the law irrespective of their religion and secular law gives complete freedom to every individual to choose and propagate their own religion. Another definition of secularism is absence of belief in God; this opposes religion and religious institutions; this view is held by Marxists, liberals, so called enlightened people (pseudo intellectuals) and socialites (for me, this word means use less people.).

Secularism vs. Islam; Organization of Islamic Countries' Cairo Declaration and its hypocrisy.

Beginning in the 19th century and in to the 20th century, one political concept that has become dominant theme and has been accepted universally is notion of human rights. Other two significant political concepts are secularism and equality of all human beings.

Islam will conquer India and massacre Hindus, Zaid Hamid, a Pakistani Security Consultant, says.

Of course he will be dismissed as crack nut and we will be told that Islam is all about defensive Jihad and mutual co-existence! We have seen this kind of talk from many Islamic organizations, Indian or Pakistani based; but we have nothing to worry because these wanna be conquerers do not know real Islam.

URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cwvts8sZ5YE

Video:

Varanasi blasts have nothing to do with Ayodhya; it is about 'when sacred months have passed away, then fight and slay the idolaters where ever you find..'

So nation has seen another explosion in Varanasi and also usual reaction from our PM. We also saw some comical stuff even in moments of despair and grief for some people. Media is not very much different from past practice in reporting this kind of incidents. For now it looks like Indian Mujahideen is responsible for this; but it can change as our law enforcement agencies along with CBI can just produce any kind of results that our political establishment wants. The problem is media and of course, the religion of peace.

Malaysia truly 'Multicultural' Asia? Veil is removed; One can call it Islamic Imperialism.

Malaysia is often cited as an example of moderate and modern Islamic country and also considered as multiculturalist. Muslim population is about < 60% of Malaysia. It has two sets of laws; one for Muslims and another for Non Muslims. By the laws of Bhumiputra, all Malays are declared as Muslims.What if when laws from these two sets contradict each other? Sultan of Perak, Sultan Azlan Shah, answers this question very well. Hopefully now, this opens eyes of some dhimmis who used to show Malaysia as an example. Other important question is, is the Sultan an Muslim extremist for enshrining and supporting such discriminatory laws? The reason I write about Islam, Koran and Sunna is that Islam is a fascist political ideology; not entirely because of violence which most people attribute to Islam with out understanding Islamic beliefs at core. Violence or Jihad (violent) is just means to achieve Islamic superiority over others i.e. subjugating all Non Muslims. Violence towards Non Muslims is not the end but one of the means, which Islam and Koran sanction very much.
Courtesy: www.bernama.com

Explaining how Islamization takes.

This video, many people must have come across. In fact, the message in this video has been pointed out in comments in one of the posts here. But, still for the sake of completion and to help starters understand the depth of problem with Islam I am posting it here. (Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpM6QKaAgP0&feature=player_embedded#)

Muslim Women wearing Veil....

Why do Muslim women wear veil? Because Allah said so in Koran, verses 33:59 and 24:31. Apart from it, there is no other reason. The reason it sustains this Islamic practice is male chauvinism. Below video is funny and disgusting; some people might say this but it is also testimony to sorry state of women in some countries. Some might say Muslim women wear it voluntarily but there have been numerous reports from Europe suggesting that Muslim women are being forced to wear.

Multiculturalism: an euphemism to Islamization; endemic of rape from Muslim Men.

This post is a really mixture of many things with central theme being Muslim men's obsession with sex. To start with, Pat Condell explains how politicians and journalists, acting together, in Sweden have destroyed Sweden in the below video. He also mentions about rape endemic that is existent in Sweden but nevertheless denied by politicians.

Islamic Blasphemy Law as explained by an Islamic Website.

Well, may be people like me, Islamophobe, got it wrong on this Islamic law of blasphemy. But if one really feels this, they can learn from teachings of an Islamic website on this blasphemy law. You can either click on the link provided below or read from below which is simply pasted from the same website.

Courtesy: http://www.islam-qa.com/en/ref/22809

Blasphemy Law; It is very much a true Islamic law having basis in Koran and Example of Mohammad.

Is blasphemy law, whose lethality and repercussions are felt by religious minorities in Pakistan, UN-Islamic?

People who have come across the news of struggle of Asia Bibi who was sentenced to death on charges of blasphemy, insulting Islam, might think that blasphemy law has no basis in Islam and Islam stands against such laws  and punishments because media writes like this on advice or under influence from so called Muslim moderate intellectuals who wish that Islamic doctrines and laws still remain esoteric.

Court barred President from Pardoning Asia Bibi; Is this the case of few people misunderstanding Islam?

Latest news in the tragedy of Asia Bibi, a Christian woman, mother of five children, in Pakistan who was sentenced to death on charges of insulting Islam, is that a Court has barred President pardoning her i.e. death sentence given earlier by a lower court stands and the whole case is still sub-judice. All this takes place after protests and criticism from human rights activists in Pakistan and from the world against this blasphemy law. To be fair, she still has chance because court can still overrule the earlier verdict.

A Muslim kills his daughter for she wanted to marry a Hindu boy; Islam sanctions Honor killings.

Many times, it is written here how Islamic law, derived from Koran and deeds of Mohammad, Prophet of Islam, makes one way traffic laws. A Muslim man can marry Non Muslim women and raise their kids as Muslims but a Muslim woman can not marry a Non Muslim man. In Sharia law, such person (Non Muslim man) is punishable by death. Similarly A Muslim can not convert to another religion and if anyone does he has to be killed; but Muslims are obliged to convert others to Islam. More ruthlessly, Islam allows parents killing their children if they think they are deviating from Islamic practices and beliefs i.e sanctifies honor killings.

Islamic Extremists in Pakistan oppose President pardoning Asia Bibi.

The struggle of Asia Bibi, a Christian woman who was sentenced to death for blasphemy in Pakistan, is testimony to the fact that how little effective or nil so called Muslim moderates in Islamic nations will be. Have we seen any demonstrations being held by Muslims anywhere in the world protesting against this kind of treatment to an innocent woman? No. Where is that outrage one usually sees when Muslims feel their religion is being unfairly targeted for criticism?

Pictures of 26/11/2008 Mumbai terrorist attacks.

Courtesy: http://www.boston.com

I put up some pictures related to 26/11 but one can watch many pictures from the above website and links are provided below.

Frame 1:
http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2008/11/mumbai_under_attack.html
Frame 2:
http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2008/12/mumbai_after_the_smoke_has_cle.html

26/11, Mumbai terrorist attacks, is for making India an Islamic republic!

What do we call people who do not learn from past or refuse to learn from past? What are the reasons for reticence and nonchalant attitude on part of Indian (Hindu) academia or journalists (though this later group was exposed again with tapes of Barkha Dutt and Vir Sanghvi) towards Islamic extremism? Or is it the belief that all religions are same and Islamic extremism is just reactionary to non existent Hindu-RSS fascism thus, if we are nice and accommodative to Muslims aspirations (it never occurs to the proponents of this view that Islam  subjugating every other is Muslims ultimate aspiration) Islamic extremism just fades away? Or is it the belief that terrorism has no religion? Or is it cognitive dissonance with respect to Islam being fascist?

Learn Islamic spirituality from this picture.

I am not sure about whether to keep this picture here or not.

In celebrating Bakrid, Muslims all over the world sacrifice animals (cow is favorite of Muslims in India; because Cow is held as holy by Hindus.) to show their submission to Allah. This orgy is based on biblical story which Mohammad could not copy it accurately. In Old Testament and Bible, God asks Abraham to sacrifice his son Isaac for him and when Abraham gets ready to slay his son, God pleased with his devotion changes his mind and says it was not needed. According to Bible and Old Testament, Abraham has two sons Isaac and Ishamel. But in Koran, it was Ishamel who was shown to be sacrified, not Isaac. But who is wrong here? Who cares? Because, this concept of the god asking a father to slay his son for him and the father getting ready to do it is ridiculous; this makes both the God and the Father very very bad. But why Christians and Jews do not celebrate this event and only Muslims do? Because, sacrificing animals was very much a pre Islamic pagan ritual too.

Save an innocent Pakistani woman, Asia Bibi, from death by signing a petition.

Courtesy: http://www.asianews.it (Click here to read the full report.)
Rome (AsiaNews) – At our reader’s request, AsiaNews has decided to launch an international petition to be sent to President Asif Zardari to save the life of Asia Bibi, who was sentenced to hanging for blasphemy. AsiaNews is also asking President Zardari to cancel or change the unjust blasphemy law, which kills many innocent victims and destroys coexistence in the country. We are asking you o support this initiative by sending a message to the following email:
salviamoasiabibi@asianews.it
Or you can send a message directly to the Pakistani President:
publicmail@president.gov.pk
Our campaign is one of many being launched in Italy (with Tv2000), Pakistan, India and the United States.

Her Husband and two of her five children.

Now Triple Talaq on a Cell Phone! Evil Triple Talaq has basis in Sunna.

Islam is stupidity and barbaric; its law are stupid and inhuman. Then what can one expect from Islamic law when it was based on one demented man's teachings, who was obsessed with himself. The point that is addressed here is whether this cruel and inhuman law of triple talaq was invented later by Ulema or it has foundation in Koran and Sunna i.e. related to Prophet Mohammad directly.

One Brave Human from Islam, probably an apostate, speaks to intolerant....

I found this video 2 weeks back on you tube. Good to see one Muslim challenging Joker Naik. Watch it:

Sharia Law on Non Muslims.

How does Sharia law treat Non Muslims? The answer to this also answers the question what Islam says about Non Muslims. This is also the reason why all non Muslims should know about Islam and its nuances if they care about  future. 

One of the four schools of Sunni Islam is Shafi'i school. 'Umdat as-Salik wa 'Uddat an-Nasik is the manual of their law book which was translated in to English by an American Muslim  Nuh Ha Mim Keller under the title ‘Reliance of the Traveller and Tools of the Worshipper’. In short it is called ‘Reliance of the Traveller’. This translation was approved by Al-Azhar University, the most authoritative institute in the Sunni branch of Islam.

Prophet to Pagans, while in Mecca, "I will bring slaughter to you"; Muslims Call this Tolerance and Non Violent

When media was reporting about spate of fatwas being issued by Deobandi Islamic clerics, in June and July, an Indian Muslimah realizing that these kind of reports could create a misconception and bad opinion of Islam in public, but not as such worried about those fatwas and about those who issued them, wrote an article; our media always eager to show real Islam, they believe to be or wanted it to be, happily published this article. This is what author, Ms. Sadia Dehlvi, wrote in that article; an excerpt from it:

“Interestingly, two-thirds of the Quran was revealed in the Meccan phase before the Prophet's migration to Medina. The Meccan revelations largely consist of spiritual narratives calling Muslims to non-violent resistance. This took place at a time when Muslim men and women were being tortured and killed for no reason other than accepting Islam. Soumayya, a woman who was tortured to death under the blazing sun, became the first martyr of Islam.”

This is what many Muslims and their apologists say, interesting that these people do not substantiate by giving credible evidence, in order to justify what took place later in Medina. Nevertheless this type of erroneous information, if not out right lies (only in this case), has its effects on people’s thinking.

Hindu-Muslim inter religious marriages! (Video) ( 2 )

Note: I was sent some more links and I am adding them in this post. (Nov., 10th, 2010).

Actually the video is about a Sikh family, living in UK, narrating their experience. This was sent by a friend and asked to be included or added to my earlier post on Hindu Muslim Marriages. But I felt that after watching and listening to this video, I decided to put this up in a separate post, here:

Muslims Favorite Verse to win over Non Muslims: To you be your religion, and to me my religion (Islam).

When I was relatively new to Islamic doctrines i.e. yet to complete the reading of Koran, I was participating in a discussion in a forum on the topic of persecution of religious minorities in Bangladesh; a woman from Bangladesh wrote, quoting a verse from Koran, proudly that Islam is a religion which teaches “to you be your religion, and to me my religion (Islam)” to showcase Islamic tolerance towards others and that there was never any compulsion in religion in Islamic theology and history.

Hindu-Muslim inter religious marriages ( 1 )

I moved the whole post here .

(Here I am disabling the comments too, so people wanting to express their views they can do so there itself.)

Myth of Moderate Islam! Kerala offers insight.

One still should be wondering how so many Muslims and Islamic organizations can not perceive Islam as a religion of peace and it is all for co-existence? Or is it that Islamic scholars, Koran and Allah are having real difficulty in convening the message of peace to world wide Muslim community, Ummah? Why was this understanding of Islam teaching peace and tolerance such a abysmal failure among Ummah?

Child marriage in Islam and evil of Ruhollah Khomeini

Courtesy: faithfreedom.org (Must watch video.)


I mentioned that all knowing god Allah does not prescribe minimum age for marriage for girls or boys. He literally tells that men can marry and divorce girls who are not pubescent (65:04).

Ruhollah Khomeini, father of Islamic revolution in Iran, has infamously said that Muslim men can marry baby girls of few hours and they even can enjoy these babies sexually without penetration until the girl reaches age of 9. Well he even practiced it; Watch this video at faithfreedom.org:

http://www.faithfreedom.org/videos-features/khomeini-sexually-assaulting-crying-and-screaming-4-year-old-girl-with-parental-consent/

website's admin rightfully observes:

' This sickening story is not about Khomeini. It is about Islam. It is a demonstration of how humans cease to be humans when they believe in evil ideologies.
Khomeini asks a father to let him have temporary “marriage” with his 4 years old daughter and this benighted man consents. The child screams when that beast rapes her and her father does not intervene.
What can reduce a person to such a zombie? Only blind faith! He does not see anything wrong in that because his prophet did the same. Khomeini did not see anything wrong in that either for the same reason.
Doesn’t Islam reduce humans into beasts?
If a Muslim is capable of such cruelty to his own little girl, why he should not murder others if his prophets tells him to? '

P.S.

Ayatollah Khomeini writes (here): "A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby.  However, he should not penetrate vaginally, but sodomising the child is acceptable.  If a man does penetrate and damage the child then, he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life.  This girl will not count as one of his four permanent wives and the man will not be eligible to marry the girl’s sister…  It is better for a girl to marry at such a time when she would begin menstruation at her husband’s house, rather than her father’s home.  Any father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in heaven.

OR one can read from here about his legal observations on women, marriage and Islam:


A Selection from "Resaleh" (Towzih ol Masael) Book of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini:

I. A woman may legally belong to a man in one of two ways; by permanent marriage or temporary marriage (Siqeh). In the former, the duration of the marriage needs not to be specified; in the latter, it must be stipulated, for example, that it is for a period of an hour, a day, a month, a year, or more.

II. A man can marry a girl younger than nine years of age, even if the girl is still a baby being breastfed. A man, however is prohibited from having intercourse with a girl younger than nine, other sexual acts such as foreplay, rubbing, kissing and sodomy is allowed. A man having intercourse with a girl younger than nine years of age has not committed a crime, but only an infraction, if the girl is not permanently damaged. If the girl, however, is permanently damaged, the man must provide for her all her life. But this girl will not count as one of the man's four permanent wives. He also is not permitted to marry the girl's sister.

III. A father or a paternal grandfather has the right to marry off a child who is insane or has not reached puberty by acting as her representative. The child may not annul such a marriage after reaching puberty or regaining her sanity, unless the marriage is to her manifest disadvantage.............

Divorce in Islam and Triple Talaq.

In one of articles I wrote here I mentioned that Muslim women boast that Islam gives right to divorce to Muslim women. It is a joke. Among four major schools of  Islamic thought in Sunni Islam, only in Hanafi school women are permitted to start proceedings of divorce. This is only in theory as law makes it extremely difficult for Muslim women to divorce their women.

And all that a Husband has to do is to say talaq three times to divorce his wife. Women simply does not have this luxury.

One Islamic scholar writes, "According to Islamic laws, husband alone enjoys the right to divorce his wife; the wife has no such right. The Principle of Mohamedan Law by Mr M Hidyatullah—the former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India (Tripathy, 1980, p-324)—in this regard, says, “Whenever the husband utters the word talaq thrice, the divorce becomes effective at that instant, irrespective of place and time.”"(Must read article to understand how Islam treats its women by Radhashyam Brahmachari.)

He also wrote another fine article (again, must read article to understand Islamic position on women) where he mentions what is happening in Islamic society in India; I read this when it was posted at islam-watch.org; I myself found it difficult to believe but I knew what he wrote was true. One of the incidents from many he mentioned is:

(Talaq by sending Telegram) The Calcutta edition The Times of India, a renowned English daily, reported on May 11, 2007, that a Muslim man called Mohammad Tazim Khan Lone from Ghaziabad, UP, had divorced his wife Abida Khatun by sending a telegram. In the telegram, the word ‘talaq’ was written thrice. At that time, Abida was staying at her father’s house in Delhi. The telegram also said that Abida could collect alimony amount, dowry items and iddut from Tazim Khan Lone. But Abida refused to accept the divorce and decided to move the case in the court of law.

But the finest evidence to this kind of Islamic law giving so called non existent rights to women is published by secular news paper itself, The Times of India.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/lucknow/Talaq-joke-on-Skype-ends-marriage/articleshow/6818970.cms

{Talaq is no joke. An e-savvy Qatar resident learnt this the hard way when he typed talaq thrice while chatting with his wife on Skype. He says he did not mean it but Dar-ul-Uloom Deoband has ruled that his nikah stands terminated.

That's not all. For his careless 'chat', the man can remarry his divorced wife only after halaala, a practice under which the woman has to marry and divorce another man before she can marry her previous husband again.

Deoband's fatwa section — Dar-ul-Ifta (DuI) — recently received a written request from Qatar, seeking a fatwa on a rather amusing situation. The youth stated that he was recently chatting with his wife on Skype when he typed the word 'talaq' three times, though he did not mean it and asked if his nikah was still valid.

Dar-ul-Ifta shot back that the nikah stands terminated. "When you pronounce talaq three times, it means talaq has taken place, and it does not matter whether the woman has reciprocated or not. Your wife has become 'haraam' for you whether you are aware of the commandment of Islam or not. You neither have the right to take her back nor solemnise new nikah with her without a valid 'halaala'. After the completion of 'iddah' (iddat) period, the woman can marry where she wishes except you," the seminary said.

As per senior Islamic scholars, 'halaala' requires the woman to complete her iddat period of 40 days beginning immediately after talaq. During this period she is supposed to stay away from celebrations and socialising.

At the end of iddat, she would have to marry another man who should then divorce her. She will be required to go through another round of iddat only then would she be eligible to marry her "first husband".}

Wait, it is not over and it is much worse in reality. Better read it from Sharia law it self, The Reliance of Traveller; Manual of Islamic Jurisprudence of Shafi'i school of Islamic Jurisprudence which is approved by Al-Azhar University, the supreme authority in Sunni school of Islam:

*2*Chapter N7.0: Taking Back a Divorced Wife (Raj`a)
.......
.......
@N7.7
When a free man has pronounced a threefold divorce, the divorced wife is unlawful for him to remarry until she has married another husband in a valid marriage and the new husband has copulated (dis: p29) with her, which at minimum means that the head of his erect penis fully enters her vagina. 

What this master piece says is that if the wife wants to remarry her first husband after triple talaq then she should not only marry another guy but she should even have sex with her second husband before she divorces and marries her first husband.

If one is trying to find logic in all this then they are wasting time because this kind of rules directly come from Koran (here) and Sunna (here). Any way, Muslims themselves are not going to question this kind of illogical law because Allah knows every thing and Muslim women continue to be proud by saying that Islam gives right to women to divorce , which does not exist in reality.

I repeat: Islam is founded by a really demented man; this is the plain truth.

'Popular Front of India' boasts about its Jihad to make India an Islamic country

Should the constitutional right of freedom of religion and freedom to propagate their religion mean that some groups based on religion (Islam, of course) have the right to instill Sharia law (Islamic law) - where in all non-Muslims are treated as second / third / fourth class citizens - as the law of this country i.e. to turn India in to an Islamic country?

Recently, Kerala CM, Achutanand, has said that Popular front of India (PFI) is highly communal and wants to make Kerala state Muslim majority state. His observation is based on pamphlets seized by Kerala police. Even this legitimate and harmless comment regarding PFI is considered as an insult to an entire Muslim community by opposition leader Mr Chandy (here or here).

So, there is nothing wrong in Muslim organizations to commit atrocities and to declare their Islamic fascist aims openly but it is expression of hate against Muslims and insult to Muslims if one reports and comments on such subversive activities. No wonder then, fascist organization like PFI  become more bold in pursuit of their fascist aims (here):
{{{    

The Popular Front of India (PFI) has claimed that the outfit is way ahead of other Muslim organisations in Kerala in converting non-Muslims to Islam.

The PFI conducted a study a few years ago to find out how effective is the Da’wa work (propagation of Islam among non-Muslims) in Kerala by the Muslim organisations. It prepared a questionnaire and sent it to the organisations concerned as a part of the study. The Jama’at-e-Islami, however, did not cooperate with the venture.

The study concluded that the Muslim organisations, which claim that they are actively engaged in Da’wa work, are spending only a negligible part of their time, energy and fund for the propagation of Islam among non-Muslims.

Only less than 10 percent of their work is addressed to non-Muslims. The study conducted by the PFI found out that there are over 700 books in the market on Islam, published by various Muslim organisations. Islamic Publishing House (IPH), run by the Jama’at-e-Islami, tops in publishing books on Islam. But, according to the PFI, only 5 percent of these books are meant for non-Muslims. Over 99 percent of the mammoth public meetings organised by the Muslim organisations do not make any sincere attempt to have personal contact with non-Muslims to invite them to  Islam, says the PFI study.

Mounathul Islam, in Ponnani and Tharbiyathul Islam in Kozhikode are the two institutions that help new converts learn the ways of Islam, but those who go there annually are only in hundreds, which is very negligible compared to the actual population of Kerala.The PFI claimed that as many as 50 percent of those who join Islam in Kerala are through the Sathya Sarani, the centre for new converts set up by the organisation in Manjeri.

}}}    

Islamic Jihad is not Fiction (Al-Qaeda's letter).

What if President Obama makes peace with Osama? What if India vacates Kashmir? What if Russia moves out from Chechnya? There will be peace and no more terrorism in this world. Many people think in this fiction and some even write wonderful pieces in their blogs. But like it is said, it is pure fiction. We hear from Islamists in deception that Islam forbids killing innocent people. But when Muslim terrorists do killing, then they are declared non Muslims. These terrorists have very much said many times what and why they were fighting for and they even have quoted verses from Koran in their support. It is just us who are blind and let ourselves to be taken for by Muslims who have same ambitions like terrorists but a  different weapon.

Nakhla Raid; Highway Robbery.

In the year 622 AD, prophet Mohammad along with his followers numbering less than 150 migrate to present day Medina, called Yathrib in those days,  situated about 250 miles north of Mecca. Muslims say that prophet and his followers were persecuted by people of Mecca, mainly, pagans of Quraysh, just for following their new religion i.e. Prophet and his followers were completely innocent. Once they settled in Medina, what was the occupation of Prophet and his noble companions to earn their living? The answer is high way robbery.

Religious Minorities in Islamic countries (Bangladesh)

It will be a repetition if I write here about what Islamic theology says about Non Muslims and how Sharia law treats or how Islamic law is supposed to treat Non Muslims. The truth is, this treatment is not just confined to books; it happens in real world. One only has to look at any Islamic country and go through its constitution to find about Islamic tolerance. If an Islamic country says it is secular in constitution then read the news about how various Islamic organizations commit violence against religious minorities e.g. Indonesia. Actually it must be sufficient to point out that charter of Organization of Islamic countries on human rights says that they do not believe in UN mandated human rights and their constitutions will be based on Sharia law (here and here).

Media lost its relevance.

Indian media, esp. English, which arrogated itself in to thinking that their views represent what is the best for this country might be needing this kind of reaction, a Journalist beaten by Muslim mob for asking questions, here it is an unfortunate and brave Urdu Journalist, more often so that it could come out of its self created cage i.e. never report anything that is unfavorable to Muslims and Islamic interests esp. when radicals are involved. But it gets more unlikely from now that our secular Journos will ever put inconvenient questions to self styled representatives of Muslims. Present day definition of secularism is all about tolerating Islamic intolerance and violence.

Hate towards Non Muslims is intrinsic part of Islamic Faith: Al-walaa and Al-baraa.

Note: A picture is added to the original post.

It is often mentioned here that hating disbelievers is intrinsic part of faith of Islam. Koran makes it clear that Non Muslims are followers of Satan and purely guided by their whims and who go astray in the pursuit. For this reason or for other resons, Allah hates and curses these Non Muslims, whose way of living is a potential threat, like seduction, to Muslims who are following the most righteous path. So when Allah hates Non Muslims, is it possible for Muslims to do opposite? Here comes the concept of Al-walaa and Al-baraa. Well it is better to know what it is about from an Islamic website rather than from an Islamophobe. And look at the below bus add put up by a Muslim Organization; what is really outrageous is the picture of dove in the ad, for when Prophet conquered Mecca the first thing he did at Kaa'ba was to break wooden Dove (Christian symbol representing Holy spirit; it is also symbol of peace with origins in Judaic and Christian theology.) with his hands. Even ignoring this, ad saying Love For All is a Islamic way of joke on Non Muslims.

Courtesy: http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com

Islam: One way Street.

Can Islam co-exist with others in peace and harmony and on the basis of equal rights? Can Islam ever integrate with the rest of world? The concept of Islamic peace with Non Muslims is already explained, here. Peace exists only when Muslims are in domination and others are subjugated. It is not insensible to look in to various Islamic beliefs and practices and see their very nature and to reach an opinion on these and about the purpose of these Islamic beliefs and practice.

Jihad as misunderstanders of Islam say.

In this politically correct environment, one even quoting a verse from Koran invites scathing criticism reflexively from media, politicians and people. The person doing this will be labelled as hate monger, Islamophobe and probably even a fascist. But how about learning about what is Jihad from an Islamic website? And see if they are saying if it is a spiritual struggle or a just defensive war.

Violence in Koran: 165 verses of violence.

Presentation of about 175 verses from Koran, chapter wise, is made below and out of these, about 165 are verses of violence which I noted when I was reading glorious Koran. I tried to keep these verses in chronological order to the best of my ability, but it could not be accomplished because of the sheer physical work it involved. Nevertheless I ordered the chapters according to chronological order given by Al-Azhar University.

Jihad and Islamic Peace as in Sharia law.

In this post, the position of Shafi'i Sunni school of Islamic law on Jihad is put up; nothing is deleted or added from their law book. The whole text, presented here, is copied from Reliance of Traveller, English translation of Shafi'i Islamic law, originally written in Arabic. It was mentioned before (here) that this translation was certified by Al-Azhar University, supreme authority in Sunni Islam.

Understanding Jihad from Hadith of Sahih Bukhari.

One Central Minister while speaking to security officials remarked that Jihad means a war against Non Muslims before he embarked upon on the notion of saffron terror. Many Muslim organizations protested vehemently to this while shouting Jihad means spiritual struggle and some even planned to sue him in a Court; it seems they dropped their plans for reasons unknown, may be due to the fear of truth coming out.

Women in Islam.

Muslim apologists, including Muslim women, say that Islam has liberated women from pre Islamic oppression that prevailed in that time in Arabian Peninsula. They wanted every one to believe that Islam has given women their freedom and rights like right to divorce. But in reality, it is a different situation on the ground. One might have already heard about infamous triple talaq.

So, what is the position of Islam on women? When I thought on this, I felt it is much better to address like how Islam regards men? One wants the answer! It is like man is a walking Di*k on two legs. I felt deeply that position of women in Islam is nothing but reflection of Prophet Mohammad: He himself married 13 times and maintained sex slaves, with whom he had sex. Allah, all mighty, specifically reveled three verses ( 33:37, 33:50, 66:01) so that Prophet can satisfy his carnal desires. Of course some people say whole Koran is a reflection of his persona.

Video footage of a Muslim woman being stoned in Pakistan.

Courtesy: jihadwatch.org

I  found out this yesterday (stoning of a woman in Pakistan by Taliban) on jihadwatch.org, as I am a regular reader of that site, and felt compelled to put this sad and sorry event. As always the case that jiwadwatch.org relies on most authentic news and sources, here too the source is abc news itself, as it was pointed out  in the post by Ms. Marisol. Click on the link below to read the full post and to see the video footage too.

Chronological Order of Koranic Chapters.

The Egyptian standard edition ( prepared by Al-Azhar University, The most important and authoritative  institution in Sunni Islam) gives the following chronological order of the Suras (Chapters), with the verses said to date from a different period given in parentheses:

Why Muslims commit horrible crimes against infidel women?

Many times it was pointed out here that Non Muslims in Islamic countries are facing discrimination and persecution and also that their numbers are dropping in all Islamic countries. One of the ways of persecuting and humiliating infidels is targeting of their women, kidnap and convert their women in to Islam. In Pakistan, Bangladesh and Egypt it is an ongoing phenomenon. This pattern is just another version of Islamic Jihad, to be waged against infidels. The latest incident to be reported is a 13 year old Hindu girl being kidnapped and converted to Islam.

The above mentioned incident is not an isolated one by any stretch. If one is interested in knowing further on this kind, read from the below links.

Some Random Takes to Give Confidence about Future.

Today marks the end of the month of Ramdan, holiest month in Islamic calender. Considering that Islam is one religion of peace, one expects no violence or decrease in violence during this month. But it is always the case that violence peaks during this month. What is so special? Actually apart from the reason for celebrating this month, there is another very important aspect; Mohammad, Founder of Islam, conquered Mecca during this month. Any way, this year, during Ramdan, 223 terror attacks took place and 1024 people died in those attacks. If one reads news regularly, in Pakistan itself when it is suffering from worst floods, 3 major explosions took place in a span of week. Of course most of these victims are innocent Muslims.
......................................................................................................

The organization Hindu Samhati has put up pictures related to Deganga riots, actually they are not riots. I will just post 3 of those pictures to give an idea. Its courage of resisting jihadis deserves respect, praise and support.

Violence in Deganga, West Bengal, and Media's Shame.

What is the future of West Bengal? Will it be an Islamic state or a secular state? Will it be a part of India? Will it be like Jammu and Kashmir, where Hindus from the valley simply disappeared? So, in this case of West Bengal too, it might be a part of India for name sake and it could be that, in reality, Islam rules and Hindus become second class citizens in their own ancestral place, thanks to our politicians’ nonchalance or our own placidity. How do Hindus feel when they are informed that in adjacent Islamic Bangladesh, the population of Hindus came down from 23% of total population in 1970s to 9% today? The continuous and ongoing persecution of religious minorities on daily basis in Bangladesh is like gospel truth.

Burning of Koran and Right Strategies

First I want to make it clear that I am against burning of any book not just Koran. Not that I have any respect for Koran, in fact I have nothing but contempt for it. But there are civilized ways to deal with this looming threat of Islamism and to show our resistance to the Islamic world; but burning of Koran is certainly not one of them. My opposition to burning Koran is, besides the above stated reason, tactical too.

Indian secularism is triumphant: Hindus asked to pay Jizya in India

How worse it can get than this. No, I am not referring Hindus paying Jizya imposed by Govt. of Kashmir, reminiscent of taxes imposed on Hindus during 'tolerant' Islamic rule -just for being Hindus -, but about silence of all other political parties (except BJP) and media and of course, pseudo secular intellectuals. 

All political parties of India are notoriously corrupt and are inept too. These parties are engaged in competition for Muslim vote bank or engaged in appeasement of Muslims as they were terrified of violent protests (remember protests in Kolkata over presence of Taslima Nasreen, writer of Bangladeshi origin) by Muslims. Interesting thing in all this is success of propaganda, by media and secularists, of Muslims being hapless victims of Hindu nationalism and violence thus, justifying all unconstitutional laws or measures.

Right now, condemning or criticizing any thing that has to do with Islam or Muslims is unwelcome and invites all kinds of accusations from politicians living in delusion that Islam can be appeased  and Islam is just like any other religion.

BJP slams entry fee on Hindu pilgrims in Kashmir  
{{{  

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Friday criticised the Jammu and Kashmir government for its decision to charge entry fee of Rs.2,000 per vehicle to the Amarnath and Vaishnodevi temples.

'The Jammu and Kashmir government's decision to impose fees on lakhs of pilgrims going for 'darshan' (visit) of Amarnath and Mata Vaishnodevi by their private vehicles is reminiscent of 'jaziya' (tax) imposed during Mughal period that was forcefully imposed on Hindu pilgrims to torture them,' BJP national general secretary Vijay Goel told reporters here.

The state government had issued a notification under Jammu-Kashmir Motor Vehicle Taxation Act 1957 to charge Rs.2,000 as entry fee valid for seven days. The same amount will be charged per day if the stay extends more than seven days.

'The Jammu and Kashmir government is playing with the sentiments of Hindu pilgrims. Instead of providing better amenities to the pilgrims the state government is making attempts to disturb the 'teerth yatra' (pilgrimage).'

He demanded that the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) ask the Jammu and Kashmir government to desist from practising 'such shameful politics'.

}}}      

Sharia Law concerning Non Muslims; Can this be called Tolerant?

Note: This is edited one. I just added another law that I found in their Sharia book to the original post. Apart from this addition, there are no changes to the original post. This addition is about the law that says Non Muslims can not testify in an Islamic court of law.

What do provisions and components of Sharia law say with regard to Non Muslims? Muslims, especially those living in infidel countries say Islam teaches tolerance, brotherhood and equality and justice. Nothing is further from truth than a statement like Islam teaches tolerance. It is good to see from their own law book, Fiqh which is an extension of Sharia.

One of the four schools of Islam is Shafi'i school. 'Umdat as-Salik wa 'Uddat an-Nasik is the manual of their law book which was translated in to English by an American Muslim  Nuh Ha Mim Keller under the title ‘Reliance of the Traveller and Tools of the Worshipper’. In short it is called ‘Reliance of the Traveler’. This translation was approved by Al-Azhar University, the most authoritative in the Sunni branch of Islam.

Raging Controversy on 9/11 Mosque; A Brief on Cordoba House and Imam Rauf.

Last time when world trade center was in the international news, it was about planes hijacked by terrorists crashing in to twin towers and their collapse and killing about 2500 people. After 9 years it was again in the international news for the reason that some one wants to construct a 13 or 15 storied Islamic center with a mosque in it near the Ground zero. Actually proposed site of this Islamic center is about 600 feet (two blocks) away from the ground zero. The cost of this whole project is $100 million. Initially proposed name of this center (mosque) is Cordoba House but this was changed to park 51 to placate the ever increasing opposition from American nationals who have seen the truth and symbolism behind this project.

Kerala CM: Popular Front of India wants Kerala to be a Muslim majority state

This statement coming from a communist leader and his assertion that he was basing his comments on pamphlets and he was only referring to an Islamic organization but not entire Muslim community are not sufficient for some introspection among political parties and media. As usual, he was ridiculed and condemned like every one who ever dare to say anything related to Islam and activities of Muslim organizations.

PFI wants Kerala to be Muslim-majority state: VS   
{{{    

Radical Islamic outfit Popular Front of India (PFI) is aiming to convert Kerala into a Muslim majority state in the next 20 years, Kerala Chief Minister V.S. Achuthanandan said here Saturday.

"For achieving that goal, the outfit is pumping money to attract youth and give them weapons. They also try to convert youth from other communities and persuade them to marry Muslim girls," Achuthanandan told reporters here.

The chief minister's statement came as his Left Democratic Front (LDF) government intensified a crackdown on the outfit, whose activists have been accused of chopping off one of the hands of a college professor for allegedly making derogatory references to Prophet Mohammed.

Justifying the crackdown on the outfit, Achuthanandan said the police is closely watching PFI's activities.
The chief minister said the outfit tried to create a clean image by organising freedom parades on independence day.

Various district administrations have already banned the parade organised by the PFI every Aug 15, he said.

}}}        

India is our jageer (domain): Taliban says

One can never really understand how so many Indian Muslims misunderstand the religion of peace. Other day we have Kerala CM  V.S. Achuthanandan saying there is an underground Islamic movement in Kerala to make Kerala a Muslim majority state in the form of Political Islamic outfit PFI. Now we have Pakistan's Taliban saying their ultimate objective is to takeover India. One can read the full report from here. Some excerpts from the report:

An informative video on Islam.

Recently http://www.citizenwarrior.com has posted a video and it is also available on youtube. Some of the content in the video can be read in the many articles from  this blog. Nevertheless, this video touches other points too.One can read on this video and its creation from here. Though the video is being put here below but one can not be sure about for how long this video will posted on youtube. That is why a permanent link is also being put besides the posting of video.

Yet, more misunderstanding by Muslims

Critics of Islamic doctrines, commonly referred to as Islamaphobes, have written on what Islamists or terrorists or extremists want and their goals and also that their ambitions and activities are in harmony with Islamic teachings and are not contradicting the teachings of Koran. We also have many important and pious Muslims, from all walks of life, also saying Islam's ambition is to bring the world under sharia law. These devote Muslims are referred by many critics as misunderstanders of Islam, because this is what Muslim apologists wanted Kafirs to believe i.e. they are misinterpreting Koran and its teachings.

Muftis say: Uncovered Kafir women are like meat; it is their fault if they get raped by Muslim men

Three Hindu minor girls were raped in West Bengal when they are passing through Muslim majority area. Read the full report.....  (Courtesy http://hindusamhati.blogspot.com/).

It is in our mentality, nothing else; Hindus in Pakistan.

For a nation founded entirely on the basis of a religion, Pakistan, attacks on the religious minorities esp. Hindus should hardly be surprising. The Hindu minority is already reduced to meek 1.6% of population. Yet it is not enough. How could it be when extermination or complete subjugation is the ultimate goal. After all disbelief in Islam is an affront to Islam and equally an aggression on Islam. More so, it becomes insulting to pious Muslims that the remaining Non Muslims are not even paying Jizya for their crime of disbelief. And of course Taliban and many groups including some political parties want to change that.

Misunderstanding Islam again!

What we have here is another misunderstander of  religion of peace and tolerance. To be more precise, it is a group actually, not Al-Qaeda, which misunderstands tenets of Islam and also another 500 people who attended their conference (In Sydney) misunderstand Islam. (Read the full report here and here)

Sharia Law comes to Kerala; Muslims cut off hands of a Christian.

Once the appeasement of Islamic extremists starts, the results from that policy could not be less savage than what happened in Kerala  yesterday (04/07/2010). In the latest development of unfolding of Islamic Jihad in Kerala, five Muslims chopped off hands of a Christian lecturer who earlier was suspended from his teaching post by the state govt.on the charges of inflammatory remarks against Islam's prophet, Mohammad. In fact the lecturer was arrested and is released on bail. This incident took place when he along with his family is returning from the Church. Full reports and details are yet to emerge regarding the culprits, if at all journalists or officials of law enforcement care to investigate.

The Integrity of our Marxist Historians.

I always wondered why there are so many lies by our Historians. Though I do not have any intention to write or investigate (actually I even do not have skill, even if I want) on this, but some time back (may be one year) I came across this piece, actually a review of a book by Arun Shourie (BJP Politician) titled ‘Eminent Historians: Their Technology, Their Line, Their Fraud’ on the net. Actually I am yet to buy or read this book, but I found the review to be insight in to who actually controls our Media and Education.  Rather than copying and pasting some excerpts from this review, I decided to keep the entire piece here. This is a must read article (review). It was written by C. J. S. Wallia.

Jizya and its meaning (Part 2)

In understanding Jizya, it is worth to focus, if not engross, on distinctness of how Muslim scholars understood this verse 9:29 for 1400 years from the time of birth of Islam and how it was implemented too by Muslim rulers.

Jizya and its real meaning (Part 1)

In Indian history text books one learns that Non Muslims (Hindus) paid Jizya tax to Muslim rulers but why it was imposed on Hindus was never explained. If at all Jizya is explained then it is only in falseness and not even close to truth because authors write “Jizya has nothing to do with religion and this tax is more of political in nature”. Funny, isn’t it? The underlying reasons for this kind of tax and law is not believing in Islam and continuation of adhering to their ancient faiths, yet authors wanted every one to believe that the issue of religion has no role in this. Hmm! Making sense? Their point that this levying of Jizya is only political is half truth from the perspective that Islam is equally a politically ideology; not that authors intend to imply this. Their (Our left intellectuals and Historians) uncompromising effort, out right lies and deceptions to sanitize Islamic history of barbarianism and cruelty becomes itself a worthy science subject to scrutiny and appraisal.

What is Jihad ! (Part 2)

In this part, the views (opinions) of some famous Islamic scholars on Jihad are presented and some of them are classical scholars and some are modern. Personally I do not agree with this distinction between classical and modern because this premise is partially based on assumption of some Islamic reformers (they call themselves) that Koran can be re-interpreted to suit the needs of present day situations. So, at the best Koran can re-interpreted but its content can not be changed. Actually it is not even clear how it can be re-interpreted when Koran is crystal clear in its message i.e. take the verse 8:39 and one has to wonder how this merciful verse can be re-interpreted. That’s precisely I reject this notion of classical and modern scholars,apart from the fact that they belong to different times. After all Koran has not changed, Muslims claim this, and re-interpreting Koran is oxymoron and it is worth recalling that majority of Muslims feel there is nothing wrong with Koran and its message.

What is Jihad ! (Part 1)

Jihad as a word needs no introduction but its meaning (definitions) and implications are misunderstood for variety of reasons and Jihad as a concept remains esoteric to the general Non Muslim public.

In the print media or e-media one hears some Muslims saying Jihad means spiritual struggle and others saying it means a defensive war. On the other hand Muslim Extremists and Terrorists say Jihad means a war on all Non Muslims to  bring the whole world under Sharia Law, but our Politicians, Media, intellectuals and Muslim apologists rush to say that these are misunderstanders of Islam, otherwise a religion of peace.

Jamaat-e-Islami wants to make India Muslim dominant

I read an article titled 'What Islam wants' on the website www.islamreview.com and after completing the reading I thought more about secular Muslims than orthodox Islamic organizations. There are many Muslims in India championing the liberal interpretation of Holy Koran and at the same time, they say that certain organizations or sects like Deobandi or Jamaat-e-Islami-Hind are secular and democratic.

Disbelievers in Allah's Hell; Non Muslims will only go to Hell.

Koran has more than 200 verses saying all Non Muslims, to be more precise who ever rejects Islam, will only go to Hell and burn there in fire for eternity. It describes hell in many ways. Initially Mohammad used this concept of Hell and fire to gain the followers but to of no avail. One can reach this conclusion because 68% of verses saying final place of disbelievers is Hell were revealed in Mecca, where he was weak. In Medina, where he took to fighting and plundering caravans obviously then, there was no need for Hell as means of persuasion as sword and booty did all the tricks.

Koran compares Non Muslims with animals like Cattle, Apes and Pigs

In 2009, a explosive device went off in Karachi and killed at least 25 Shi'a Muslims and Pakistan's Interior Minister responded to this by saying that Muslim terrorist who committed this act is worse than an infidel (Kafir), according to a Reuters report:

A suicide bomber blew up a Shi'ite Muslim procession in Pakistan's commercial capital Karachi on Monday, killing at least 25 people, in an attack that underscored multiple security challenges facing the U.S. ally..... Interior Minister Rehman Malik said at least 25 people were killed and about 50 wounded in Karachi, a major transit point for military and other supplies to Afghanistan for the U.S- and Nato-led anti-insurgency effort.

Malik said extremists wanted to destabilize Pakistan.

"Whoever has done this, he cannot be a Muslim. He is worse than an infidel," he told reporters.

One can not be sure what the Minister intend to imply, but according to the Koran, a Non Muslim is the worst creature among all the creations by Allah. It is pertinent to recall that Islam believes that a Man is the best creation of Allah among all the creations by him. Having said Man is the best and then it says Non Muslims are the worst among all the creatures and of course Muslims are the best. So we have a section of Humanity (Muslims) at the top and remaining section (Non Muslims) at the bottom on the scale of worthiness of creatures on this earth.

Allah misguides Non Muslims and sends more Shaitans to mislead them!

At the core of Islam's theology is the belief that Allah is the only god and he is the creator of Universe and every thing in it. In Koran, Allah says he created mankind for a purpose and the purpose is that they serve him by worshiping him alone. See the following verse:

051.056,YUSUF ALI: I have only created Jinns and men, that they may serve Me.
PICKTHAL: I created the jinn and humankind only that they might worship Me.
SHAKIR: And I have not created the jinn and the men except that they should serve Me.

Koran prohibits friendship between Muslims and Non Muslims; And Taqiyya

Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, a 23 year old teenager, who unsuccessfully attempted to detonate a PETN explosive on Christmas day on the Detroit bound plane, is a son of wealthy former banker. Subsequently upon his arrest and investigation, it is reported by many News Papers that he under the id farouk1986 posted his thoughts in facebook and in an Islamic website. Here, though not all postings are completely relevant to this main article but it is worth to have a look, are those postings.

Allah does not love Non Muslims and He hates and curses Non Muslims

What kind of attitude or mindset Non Muslims can expect from Muslims? To say that mindset of Muslims is or can be influenced by Koranic teachings of perspective of Allah towards Non Muslims is neither illogical nor uncommon sense. After all Muslims believe in infallibility of Koran. Lets see plethora of verses of Allah's view on Non Muslims found in Koran (By no means, the list of the following verses conveying stated message is exhaustive.):

Islamic Tolerance: What does Koran say about Non Muslims?

We often hear and see Muslims and their apologists making statements or writing in news papers wanting us to believe that Koran guides Muslims to respect people of other religions and their belief systems. We have seen even one Bollywood star making a claim that he himself read Koran and it prohibits killing of innocent people. (Please remember and note that Islamic dictionary has its own definitions for words like peace, tolerance and innocence.) They even say that Islam means ‘peace’ trying to put a kinder, gentler and tolerant decorating cloth, that is not existent, over their Islam’s dreaded, inhuman and barbaric ideology. Nothing is further from truth than this kind of statements by Muslims.

Koran says Muslims and Non Muslims are not equal; Muslims are better than Christians, Hindus and Jews.

If one has a relative working in Saudi Arabia, suppose he had unnatural death, then according to Saudi Islamic law (Read the section named 'Settlement of Death Compensation Claims' and 5th point in this section; at the end of this post, this section will be presented i.e. pasted.), blood money (Diyya) should be paid to the the family of the victim by the culprit and the amount to be paid depends on the religion and gender of the victim. This amount of the blood money prescribed for a Non Muslim is less than that is prescribed for a Muslim.

If the victim is a Muslim, then the amount to be paid is SR1,00,000/-, for a Christian or a Jew, it is SR50,000/- and if the victim is Hindu it is about SR6,666.66/-.

What is Saudi Arabia? A radical Islamic country? Well ignorant columnists under the influence of feigning Islamists say this in news papers. It is the birth place of Mohammad and Islam. Koran and Sunna are its constitution. Muslims feel it is a perfect example as a country for Muslims. Thinking of Saudi Arabia as a radical Islamic country can only be termed as puerile and it is testimony to ones ignorance of Islam itself.

Interview with Vijay Kumar, Running for US Congress from State of Tennessee.

Here is some one connected to India, if not Indian, who bravely speaks for freedom and for full blooded opposition to implementation of Sharia Law in USA. I guess BJP has a lot to learn from this man regarding how to fight extremism and its barbaric and inhuman ideology.

This interview was done by Ali Sina and it appeared in faithfreedom.org website. Click here to read the full interview.

Can West Bengal be Saved from Islamism and its Violence?

I am not supposed to write on this kind at least for time being but I decided to write about this. Well I am not a journalist so please excuse me for small mistakes because I am directly writing on the post with out any preparation, so there may be some mistakes; after all English is not my mother tongue. 

This post is not about naxallite violence in West Bengal about which our media is writing a lot where in they make tall claims like how this could impede our economic progress. Other than this naxallite violence  there is another reason that needs our attention to which important institutions in our country are reticent to even acknowledge.

Lets listen to what Muslims say. (Part 2)

What is the ultimate goal of Islam according to or written in Koran and Hadiths? 1. Is it the world wide domination of Islam by any means? 2. Is it that every life on this planet earth has to be converted to Islam by any means? It is obvious that second question implies the first one.

People or readers might take offence to these aggressively put questions and might even slander me for a moment or for some time depending on who you are. Before I go further I want to expand the first question and put it properly in tune with wordings of Koran.

Rule of Abrogation in Holy Koran

By just looking at some peaceful verses by directly reading from Koran or cited and shown by proponents of Islamic tolerance to show that no where does Koran commands Muslims to fight or kill non Muslims because they refuse to become Muslims, these non Muslim readers will probably be inclined to apply conservative or accepted methods of logic.

(One can also watch the following video for understanding Rule of Abrogation)

A very brief background of Prophet Mohammad

Prophet was born in the year 569 and lost his father very early and then Mother, when he was only 7 years old. Then he was brought up by his grand father and then Uncle Abu Talib. He belongs to a tribe Quraysh, largest and powerful in Mecca. He married a wealthy woman named Khadija when he was 25 and she was 40 (it is not 100% accurate, better to say between 35 and 40) and she was a wealthy merchant. For her this was second or third marriage. She was very powerful and wealthy too. Prophet, before the marriage, worked for her by managing her caravans.

Reading Holy Koran

Koran is the foundational book of Islam. Muslims believe that it is revealed to Prophet Mohammad in stages through Angel Gabriel between 610 Ad and 632 AD.

It is important to know certain things before reading Koran because it is not like other scriptures. Never the less it is better to read Koran and know about Islam and its philosophy, if one do not believe what is written here. It should also be mentioned that just because a Verse of peaceful nature is in Koran, it does't mean that it has meaning or its ruling is applicable today. This is where Koran differs from other religious scriptures. We come to this later.

Koran is divided in to chapters and word for chapter in Arabic is Sura. The chapters contain further instructions which appear numbered and are called verses, Arabic word for verse is Ayah.

Lets listen to what Muslims say. (Part 1)

A certain Pakistani Army officer, Brigadier ( now Retired) S.K. Malik, wrote a book 'The Quranic Concept of War' in 1979; in the preface written by Allah Bukhsh K. Brohi, the former Pakistan's ambassador to India, we read the following:

"But in Islam war is waged to establish supremacy of the Lord only when every other argument has failed to convince those who reject His Will and work against the every purpose of the creation of mankind."