Aurangabad was founded by an Islamic bigot and a cruel tyrant, Aurangazeb. It is a shame that even this bigot is sanitized and glorified by insane marxist, liberal and communist historians. When one studies Islamic history of India, they should definitely question why should Hindus and Sikhs bear with this kind of insults like sanitized texts of history and a name like Aurangabad?
Is it appropriate to continue with the name Aurangabad just because it was built by this degraded human being, a devout Muslim (yes a devout muslim is a degraded human being.)? More importantly, how this threat of Islamic apartheid be faced and countered? I always felt that it is a sad thing that Hindus in this country have to depend upon an organization like RSS and political parties like BJP and Shiv Sena for dignity. If Indian Marxists are successful in sanitizing Islamic barbarism in our class text books, these so called Hindu parties have allowed Indian Muslims to portray themselves as victims; but reality is that Muslims and Islam will feel victim-hood and insulted with mere presence of infidels and other faiths.
 |
| Bhai Mati Das, a disciple of Gure Tegh Bahadur, sawed in to two. |
 |
| Bhai Dayal in boiling water. |
