New version of "slay the idolaters when forbidden months are over....": Ahmadis fit to be killed

Ahmadiyya Muslim community! Its adherents, Ahmadis, consider them selves as a sect of Islam and their places of worship are also called mosques. Ahmadis differ from main stream Islam in many ways, the most important one being acceptance of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad - founder of Ahmadiyya movement - as Prophet.

But, Islam considers Prophet Mohammad to be the last prophet before the day of the Judgment; this is the first of 5 pillars of Islam: shahada (saying 'Allah is the only God and Mohammad is messenger'). Muslims say that belief of Ahmadis regarding the prophet-hood violates basic tenets of Islam thus, their sect can not be a part of Islam.

Probably in seventies, Pakistan Govt. passed a law that declared Ahmadiyya sect [3 to 4 million Ahmadis live in Pakistan] as non-Islamic. But, persecution of and violence against Ahmadis continues in Pakistan and li last 3 years it increased sharply like attacks on two Ahmadiyya mosques killing 95 people (here).

Now, pamphlets seems to be in circulation saying that Ahmadis are fit to be killed. This may not be like a open command like Allah issued in Koran in the verse 9:5: "when sacred months have passed, fight and slay the idolaters wherever you find them, sieze them, besiege them and prepare for them every ambush.....", nevertheless, it tells about degree of intolerance that can be found in Islam with respect to non-Muslims.

Reports of Victims of Forced Conversions to Islam, Rapes and Forced Marriages

This is not new. From the time Islam was founded to present day, this kind of terrorization, humiliation of non-Muslims - enslaving non-Muslim women sexually - by Muslims is always in practice. It will continue in to future because media and people, in general, have refused to see and counter it. Those who spoke on this were condemned and vilified as communal. These atrocities will continue in to future because Muslims do not see them wrong as it follows example of Prophet and also that they believe that they will be rewarded by Allah.

Earlier, this blog reported on notice of rise in kidnapping of Coptic girls (here).

Some people, in compulsion of their political ideology or fancy beliefs, try to deny Islamic intolerance towards all non-Muslims - which is inherent to and a necessity of Islamic faith (one can read a very interesting one on this from here).

For some, to speak against these gruesome acts or Islamic beliefs is costly and dangerous because of danger of being branded as communal. Some feel that staying in ignorance of Islamic tenets  and doctrines, deliberately, and not criticizing Islam and its beliefs is ethical and testimony to their liberal and secular outlook.

So, the evil - that is Islam - will continue to advance. Tolerating intolerance is not a virtue; it is a vice.

{{{ [Source]  

LAHORE -- In Pakistan forced conversions to Islam, rapes and forced marriages are on the rise.

According to a story by Agenzia Fides (the information service of the Pontifical Mission Societies), the victims are mostly Hindu and Christian girls, belonging to religious minorities. The information came from Fides' local sources.

Fides said this has been a worrying phenomenon for the Church in Pakistan for some time, and one that the Church is trying to address. It is looking for institutional cooperation, but the process is an uphill battle.

"The Christian girls are the weakest and most vulnerable, because their communities are poor, defenseless and marginalized, therefore easily exposed to harassment and threats. Often they do not even have the courage to denounce the violence," a sister told Fides.

The sister hides and assists the girls who have managed to escape, Fides said.

The sister said, "But the trend is worrying: There are hundreds of cases a year registered and those that come to light are only a fraction."

Fides said in a society that tolerates discrimination of religious minorities, especially of women, the dominant religion and related social position are used to impose tyranny.

A report sent to Fides by the Center for Legal Assistance and Settlement (CLAAS), which takes care of legal assistance for Christians who are discriminated against and persecuted in Pakistan, confirmed this issue. It reported a number of troubling situations, occurring mainly in the province of Punjab.

Fides said Sidra Bibi, a 14-year-old Christian in the district of Sheikhupura in Punjab, is the daughter of a worker in the cotton industry. A Muslim from the village had his eye on her and began to molest her. He eventually abducted and raped her, before threatening her with death.

Physically and psychologically abused, the girl became pregnant.

Fides said she managed to escape from her captor, and is now back with her family. Police have refused to accept her complaint, Fides said, and now CLAAS lawyers are handling the case.

Fides said Tina Barkat, a 28-year-old-Christian, was approached by a Muslim friend who, after being friends with her for several months, asked her to convert to Islam. Her family began to read her verses of the Koran, kidnaped and threatened her, and then gave her in marriage to a Muslim family member. Her attorneys have filed a motion to dissolve the marriage.

Fides said a similar situation has occurred to Samina Ayub, a 17-year-old Christian, who lives with her family near Lahore. Kidnaped by a Muslim, she was forcibly converted to Islam, renamed Fatima Bibi, and forced to marry in the Muslim tradition.

Fides said her family reported the abduction, but police have not prosecuted those responsible. The case remains unsolved, and her family is asking for help from everyone interested in saving Samina.

Fides said Shazia Bibi, a 19-year-old Christian from Gujranwala, in Punjab, worked as a maid in the house of a Muslim woman, the owner of a grocery store. The Muslim boy from the store was in love with Shazia. In collaboration with the owner, they held a "conversion" and forced her into marriage. Fides said the plan was successful, but now as a result of intervention from Shazia's family the case has ended up in court.

In addition, Fides said, two other Christian girls, Uzma Bibi, 15, and from Gulberg, and Saira Bibi, 20, a nurse from Lahore, were abducted by Muslim neighbors, converted to Islam and then forced to marry in an Islamic ceremony.

Fides said the horrified families of the girls have reclaimed their daughters, and the cases are currently before the High Court of Lahore, represented by lawyers provided by CLAAS.
}}} 

Further reading: Beware Hindu girls 

A Muslim in UK beaten for leaving Islam?

However one think on secularism, it is simply incompatible with Islam. Concept of freedom of religion is never a part of Islamic discourse. Slogan of Muslim apologists - like Sultan Shahin, Ashghar Ali Engineer - that "there is no compulsion in Islam" is an effort in direction of misguiding non-Muslims and to keep them in false sense of security.

Prophet said, "If somebody (Muslim) discards his religion, kill him." (Sahih Bukhari; vol. 4, book 52, # 260)

Prophet said, "The blood of a Muslim who confesses that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that I am His Apostle, cannot be shed except in three cases: In Qisas for murder, a married person who commits illegal sexual intercourse and the one who reverts from Islam (apostate) and leaves the Muslims."(Sahih Bukhari; vol. 9, book 83, # 17)

Reliance of Traveller, an English version version of "Umdat as-Salik wa 'Uddat an-Nasik" - Sharia law book [fiqh] of Shafi'i school of Sunni Islam - and also certified by Al-Azhar university [most influential institute in Sunni Islam] says in divison 'o' and section 8 that leaving Islam is the ugliest form of unbelief and clause @o8.1 says (here):

When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed.

Maududi, founder of Jamaat-e-Islaami, supports death penalty for apostasy on the basis of Koran too and one can read it here. 

If Islamic states deny freedom of religion through laws and arresting apostates, in non-Muslim countries one can always find some (enough) pious Muslims enforcing this code of sharia law:" death to or violence on Muslims who convert to other religions. The effect is the same because we do not see any condemnation of such heinous acts by media or so called liberal guardians and spokesmen of morality and this kind only encourages more Muslims to act in such punitive manner. 

In UK, a Muslim covert to Christianity attacked by Muslims      

{{{      

A MAN has been locked up for attacking another man in the street with a plank of wood.

Nottingham Crown Court heard that Sher Ahmadzai, 20, hit his victim with a metre-long plank, causing him to fall over during the attack in Radford.

Another man then started punching and kicking the fallen man in the face.

The victim escaped without serious injury but was left with a sore jaw and leg pain.

The court heard Ahmadzai knew his victim and both were members of the Afghan community.

The man was of Muslim faith but converted to Christianity after claiming asylum here.

"This did not sit well with the defendant," said prosecutor Paul Stimson.

"That culminated in the assault in October last year in Hartley Road.".............

}}}   

Christians in Australia openly protest at Islamic billboard saying 'Jesus is a Prophet of Islam'

When Allah in Koran has permitted pillage (or robbery), murder, enslaving and rape to advance Islam and eradicate infidelity or disbelief, lies and half truths - in promotion of Islam - never come in to conscience of Islamists and they are perfectly allowed. Especially, the present day reality of inferiority of Muslim nations with respect to infidel nations in regard to military strength, lies and half truths become very handy too. Finally, more importantly, - to poke more fun to at nose of infidels - these lies and half truths can be sold freely using concepts of infidels like freedom of expression and freedom of religion. Money for advertising such lies is never a problem too as Muslims are flush with petro dollars and there are plenty of clients for these petro dollars in non-Muslim majority nations.

In Australia, this is what Muslims are trying to do by raising billboards depicting Jesus as a Prophet of Islam, probably intended for double purpose of showing Islam as tolerant, inclusive and also for gaining new converts.  

One of many Muslim-erected billboards that have infuriated Christians

Courtesy: http://www.dailymail.co.uk

But it does not tell the whole picture esp. about how different concept of Jesus in Islam is from concept of Jesus in Christianity .

It is never really difficult to see such lies if we read every day news coming from Islamic nations in the net where in Islamic Govt.s keep arresting Muslims who left Islam to Christianity and Christians accused of proselytizing for Christianity. Many Islamic nations simply ban other religions from propagating their faith in their countries. In to Saudi Arabia, you can not take crosses, Bibles and pictures of Jesus. Christians (for that matter, all non-Muslims) are forbidden to celebrate their festivals in public place.

[Note: To humiliate non-Muslims further, all these Islamic nations send billions of petro dollars for proselytizing in non-Muslim majority countries.]

Or for that matter, try to erect a billboard in an Islamic nation telling Jesus was crucified on cross and is the son of God! Reaction from Muslims and Islamic Government will be what we can only call intolerance -probably with charges of blasphemy on people responsible for those billboards.

So, should't what Muslims are saying in this billboard contradict what Islamic nations are practicing? Not exactly in terms of Islamic theology as Islam sees itself as the only true religion and final message with Jesus being one in line of Prophets sent by God to guide mankind and of course, Prophet Mohammad being the last, the seal of all Prophets and the greatest. In fact it insults Christianity further by saying that Jesus is not a son of God, blatantly lying on what constitutes Trinity and, ultimately, Jesus is not crucified on cross as the following verses say:

O People of the Scripture! Do not exaggerate in your religion nor utter aught concerning Allah save the truth. The Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, was only a messenger of Allah, and His word which He conveyed unto Mary, and a spirit from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers,......... (4:171, Pickthall)

And because of their saying: We slew the Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, Allah's messenger - they slew him not nor crucified him, but it appeared so unto them; and lo! those who disagree concerning it are in doubt thereof; they have no knowledge thereof save pursuit of a conjecture; they slew him not for certain. (4:157, Pickthall)

The Jews call 'Uzair a son of Allah, and the Christians call Christ the son of Allah. That is a saying from their mouth; (in this) they but imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say. Allah's curse be on them: how they are deluded away from the Truth! "(9:30, Pickthall)

Similar is the case with Bible when Muslims say they respect Bible. But which Bible? Bible that never existed. What Muslims do not tell is their belief of present day Bible being corrupted.

According to Muslims coming of Prophet Mohammad was mentioned in Bible but this was removed by Christians. Since, present day [or at any time] Bible never mentioned anything like it, Muslims claim that - as always with out any proof and like in numerous occasions - this was removed thus, Bible was corrupted. If one wants more proof, they can read about reports on Muslims in Pakistan demanding banning of Bible (here, here).

"From those, too, who call themselves Christians, We did take a covenant, but they forgot a good part of the message that was sent them: so we estranged them, with enmity and hatred between the one and the other, to the day of judgment. And soon will Allah show them what it is they have done." (5:14, Yusuf Ali)

Such is the nature of Islam, as it exists in Koran, legalizing mocking of every other religion.

Muslim billboard campaign that declares Jesus a 'prophet of Islam' causes outrage  
{{{

.........Jesus is sometimes invoked to assert some sort of commonality between Muslims and Christians, implying that Muslims, too, 'believe in Jesus'.

But Muslims, and the Koran, deny the central Christian beliefs of Jesus' divinity, crucifixion and resurrection.

Elsewhere on its website, Mypeace states that 'the Qur’an repeatedly reminds that Jesus was a human prophet sent by God, not part of God Himself'.

Julian Porteous, auxiliary bishop at the Catholic Archdiocese of Sydney, told the website: 'In Australia with its Christian heritage a billboard carrying the statement ‘Jesus A prophet of Islam’ is provocative and offensive to Christians.' 

'Central to Christianity is the belief that Jesus Christ is more than a prophet,” he said. 

'He is the Son of God. He is acclaimed Lord and Savior of humanity. This statement is a direct assault on Christian beliefs.'

Urging Mypeace to take down the posters, Bishop Porteous said that religions should avoid offending people of different faiths.   

}}}

Muslim members of Punjab Assembly (Pakistan) oppose a Christian presenting budget and replace him with a Muslim

Islam of terrorists is not real Islam! Islamic extremists are a tiny minority! We just keep reading these or variations of these statements.

Most people try to understand Islam from point of view of terrorism ignoring and forgetting the fact that terrorism is just a tactic or means to achieve political goals. Islam - being political at its core - is imperialist (supremacist) in its (political) ideology supported by religious dogma filled with with universal claims of Islam is the true religion and others are falsehood, Islam is the light and others are darkness, Muslims are superior and the best of humanity while non-Muslims are the vilest of all creatures and are like vermin. For better of humanity, this vermin should be defeated and subjugated.

For no other reason, all most all Muslim majority nations reject secularism, declare themselves as Islamic nations, restrict freedom of religion and are the only ones to form an organization based solely on religion.

It is these supremacist beliefs - coupled with belief of victim-hood and inferior status thus, feeling of injustice because they should be powerful and ruling class - that guide popular movements in Islamic nations. In Islamic law, a Muslim is always above non-Muslim in every aspect of life - with friendship between Muslims and non-Muslims is prohibited by Allah in Koran - and all non-Muslims should be excluded from Islamic Govt..

It is precisely these beliefs that are behind legislative members of Punjab(Pakistan) Assembly objecting to a Christian presenting budget.

The reason mentioned in news report i.e. fear of losing votes from 'conservative' Muslims should tell how bogus the claim of only a tiny minority of Muslims being extremists by Islamic apologists and media is.

Seema Chisthi: Defense of Islam

Alliance between Islamists and Communists is not just legendary. It is still very much in existence and for Islamists these leftist ideologues are just useful idiots who could be dealt with after they assume power just like, (Late) Khomeini, after coming to power, has thousands of communists put to death who initially supported his revolution. Yet, leftists remain blindfolded about Islamic ideology because of their shared hatred towards US, democracy and freedom.

I do not know much about Ms Seema Chisthi, on her religion and her political ideology, except that she is wife of Mr Sitaram Yechuri, an important leader of CPI(M), and an editor in Indian Express.

Considering the possibility of her having leftist leanings and being an atheist, one can not be surprised to see her scathing contempt for Hinduism and her frequent vitriol against BJP.

But, what I am surprised to find is that in an article she wrote for Indian Express under the title 'Taking up the defense of Islam' (her original article can be read from this link) she literally extolls the non-existing virtues of Islam and tells us about how one Islamic scholar from Pakistan, Dr Tahir-ul-Qadri, issues fatwas against terrorism and explains present day Islamic terrorism is not real Islam. But, she never ventures in to Islamic theology - may be, she is not familiar - nor tries to crosscheck some historical facts mentioned by her. It is unbelievable that she could write this piece! When I tried to think what made her to turn in to such a miserable apologist for Islamic supremacism, I could only think of present day fashionable trend of writing against Hinduism and praising other religions.

Overall, who needs facts! not definitely our main stream media which completely ignores or conceals Islamic extremism in India from violence by some Muslim groups to what some Ulema are saying. One can not expect politically correct media to write what Sharia law says but they should at-least stop publishing this kind of  views as it is bound to have some impact on some readers and emboldens Islamic extremists further.

Note: Excerpts from her article are in italics and blocks with background and my comments are below.

Nonie Darwish (A Former Muslim): Solving poverty of Muslims - The Islamic way

In my few discussions with Muslims on net about Islam, one question I put up is what was the profession of Prophet Mohammad and his companions (sahaba) during their stay in Medina for full 10 years. How did they earn their living? Silence or some stupid justifications for acts of their Prophet is the normal reaction from Muslims. The correct answer is plundering trade caravans of non-Muslims(Meccans) and villages through raids.

One can read about one such raid, first one, called Nakhla raid from here. One can also read following Hadith and quotes for better understanding of what Ms Darwish has written.

Allah's Apostle said: "I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah's Apostle, and offer the prayers perfectly and give the obligatory charity, so if they perform a that, then they save their lives an property from me except for Islamic laws and then their reckoning (accounts) will be done by Allah."(Sahih Bukhari; Vol. 1, Book 2,# 25)

Allah's Apostle said, "I have been given five things which were not given to any amongst the Prophets before me. These are:
1. Allah made me victorious by terror (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month's journey.
2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for praying and a thing to perform Tayammum. Therefore my followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.
3. The booty has been made Halal (lawful) for me (and was not made so for anyone else).
4. Every Prophet used to be sent to his nation exclusively but I have been sent 1o all mankind.
5. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of Resurrection.)
(Sahih Bukhari; Vol. 1, Book 8,# 429)

Allah's Apostle said, "Booty has been made legal for me." (Sahih Bukhari; Vol. 4, Book 53,# 351)

We said to 'Umar bin Al-Khattab, Jo Chief of the believers! Advise us." He said, "I advise you to fulfill Allah's Convention (made with the Dhimmis) as it is the convention of your Prophet and the source of the livelihood of your dependents. (i.e. the taxes from the Dhimmis.)” (Sahih Bukhari; Vol. 4, Book 53, # 388)

Prophet Mohammad said, "Survival of my community rests on the hoofs of its horses and the points of its lances; as long as they keep from tilling the fields; once they began to do that they will become as other men."
(G.E. von Grunebaum, Classical Islam: A History 600-1258(London): Allen and Unwin, 1970, p.57.)

"I will reserve comment on what is in the city I have captured", Amr ibn al-As, the conqueror of Egypt, reported to Umar [Second caliph and father-in-law of Prophet Mohammad] upon the occupation of the port town of Alexandria, " aside from saying that I have seized .... forty thousand poll tax paying Jews....". He was peremptorily ordered to ship a year's supply of food to Medina for upkeep of the Muslim community, which he dutifully did. [EFRAIM KARSH; Islamic Imperialism (A History); page 26; he referred to
(Ibn Sa'd, a'-Tabaqat al-Kubra (Cairo: Dar al-Tahrir,1968), Vol.3, pp.77,157-58)]

(Late)Dr. Muhammad Muhsin Khan - co-author of Noble Koran and translator of Hadith of Sahih Bukhari in to English from Arabic - writes on Jihad, in a foot note to the verse 2:190 in Noble Koran and also in introduction to the book on Jihad in Sahih Bukhari, that:

"Jihad is holy fighting in Allah’s Cause with full force of numbers and weaponry. It is given the utmost importance in Islam and is one of its pillars. By Jihad Islam is established, Allah’s Word is made superior (which means only Allah has the right to be worshiped), and Islam is propagated. By abandoning Jihad Islam is destroyed and Muslims fall into an inferior position; their honor is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish. Jihad is an obligatory duty in Islam on every Muslim. He who tries to escape from this duty, or does not fulfill this duty, dies with one of the qualities of a hypocrite."

All this also can be viewed from the background of Prophet Mohammad planned and executed 84 wars (or raids) in 9 years which turns in to one per every 6 weeks. But the real problem is with Koran saying about Prophet Mohammad that he is an example for all Muslims to follow for eternity and is the perfect human (ideal man) in the history of mankind. And this what Nonie Darwish also mentions.

This article originally appeared in frontpagemag.com (here).

Malaysian Muslim women launch obedient wife club

Prophet Mohammad said that devout and good Muslim women are those who maintain chastity and are obedient to their husbands (also the verse 4:34). Prophet further said that a woman can not serve Allah with out carrying the right of her husband. In fact, when a Muslim woman dies she will go to heaven if only her husband is pleased with her.

Prophet said many more and they can be read from here.

In April, a Muslim MP in Malaysia said that Muslim men are having extra marital relations because women(wives) are neglecting their duty and are not obedient (here):

Malaysian men have extramarital sex because of “wives who neglect their responsibilities” to their husbands, a Malaysian lawmaker told Parliament on Thursday, outraging women’s groups.
“Husbands driving home after work see things that are sexually arousing and go to their wives to ease their urges,” said independent lawmaker Ibrahim Ali, according to online portal Malaysiakini.
“But when they come home to their wives, they will say, ‘wait, I’m cooking,’ or ‘wait, I’m getting ready to visit relatives’,” Ibrahim said.
“In Islam, wives are supposed to stop everything to fulfill their husband’s demands.”

So now, we have some Muslim women in Malaysia volonteering to help Muslim women being more obedient to their husbands so that their husbands do not go astray and they formed a club for this purpose.

Malaysian women launch 'The Obedient Wife Club'     

{{{      

AFP - A group of Malaysian Muslim women say they will fight divorce, domestic violence and other problems -- by appealing to wives to be more obedient, according to one of the organisers.

Maznah Taufik said "The Obedient Wife Club" being launched Saturday is aimed at drawing women who will be taught how to please their husbands better to prevent them from straying or misbehaving.

"We just want to ask all the wives to be obedient wives so that there will be fewer problems in our society," such as infidelity, divorce and domestic violence, she told AFP.

"Obedient wife means they are trying to entertain their husbands, not only taking care of their food and clothes," Maznah said. "They have to obey their husbands. That's the way Islam also asks."

Malaysia is a Muslim-majority country, with some 60 percent of the population practicing the religion, alongside large ethnic Chinese and Indian communities who are mostly Buddhist, Hindu and Christian.

According to local media, the country's divorce rate doubled from 2002 to 2009, with rates higher among Muslims than non-Muslims.

Maznah said it was also the men's responsibility to teach their wives to be obedient.

"Some wives, they just want to get married for leisure but they don't know the responsibility," she said.

"To entertain their husbands is compulsory. If she doesn't do this, the husband will look for another woman... and the house will break down."..........

}}}    

Or one can read this: Malaysian women urge wives to be 'whores in bed'  

A Saudi cleric to infidels: Convert to Islam or Pay Jizya or Embrace death

Of course, there is no compulsion in Islam!!!! When ever a non-Muslim (or an Ex-Muslim) tells the truth about Islam - like the ones being told by this Saudi cleric - he will be branded as communal or as an Islamophobe.



URL address: http://youtu.be/dGRTDt5w-dM 

A Saudi Sheik: Only thing Muslims are demanding is Islam rule the world once again

URL address: http://youtu.be/Fc-Q6E_zRrg

These scholars must be having amnesia or bad knowledge (or sense) of history. The Islamic supremacist logic is if Muslims kill innocent people, it is magnificent and compassion or will be termed as un-Islamic. But conquests by non-Muslims are tragedies. 

Islam explained in simple words by a Muslim

One can see how twisted logic of Islam is? But this is what Koran says in verses 9:005 and 9:029.

One can also see how definitions of various words change when Muslims use them i.e. here the word 'friendship'. One group pays Jizya for protection or not to get killed and other group calls this friendship.

URL address for above video: http://youtu.be/7lGZLRTivQA 

LeT threatens Hindus of massacres if they make pilgrimage to Amaranath shrine

LeT (Lashkar-e-Toiba) has threatened Hindus on making any pilgrimage to Amaranath and Vaishno Devi shrines in Jammu and Kashmir. Lets ask what big difference this makes to Hindus and also how different it is from present situation and policies of present Govt.. Below is the brief summary w.r.t. Kashmir:

1.    Hindus and Sikhs have been expelled from valley 20 years back.

2.    Recently, Govt. of Jammu and Kashmir has literally imposed Jizya tax on Hindu pilgrims to Amaranath cave shrine; yet, our central Govt. under Congress and Ms Sonia, which gives highest importance to principle of secularism, neither said anything nor did anything with regard to this Jizya tax. Then, secularism in India is for Hindus only. To question this Jizya tax will only invite the label of communal from our secular media (here).

3.    The same Govt., J and K, has kicked out a Christian pastor - who is living there since 1963 - from valley on the charges that he is proselytizing. This too has not raised any outrage from secularists or intellectuals or liberals. But a second look tells it may not be their fault completely because media simply has not reported this. But one can only imagine how the reaction will be from media, pseudo secularists and liberal terrorists  if some BJP state Govt. has expelled some Christian missionary (here or here).

4.    J and K Govt. has literally blocked BJP leaders from hoisting National flag in Sri Nagar on republic day with complete support from Central Govt. (here). The attempt of BJP was labelled as communal by various political parties and media commentators. The actions of J & K Govt. as in (2) and (3) are not communal but hoisting flag is communal according to these enlightened people and opinion makers! All this means we Indians unofficially have approved and stamped Islamic imperialism over non-Muslims. Sentiments of Muslims are above laws and constitution.

5.   So, how does Govt. address some of these inequities like Jizya on pilgrimage to Hindu shrines? Get a phony Swamy like Agnivesh - created by self serving media, Congress(I) and Ms Sonia - to do its job! Far from getting Jizya on Hindus removed, it is telling Hindus, through the ugly mouth of Agnivesh, that pilgrimage to Amaranath and Vaishno Devi shrines is not important, in fact pilgrimage is ridiculous (here). Probably, only in India such logic can be sold and people and media buy it with aplomb. Yet again, up-holding a law is not important but Hindus adjusting to Islamic imperialism is the proper course.

This is the standard procedure all over the world: whether Muslims are in minority or majority, it is for non-Muslims to make adjustments with Islamic culture of imperialism like Muslims demanding imposition of sharia. No wonder then, Islamic organizations make such outrageous demands and indulge in large scale violence against non-Muslims.

LeT threatens to blow up temples in Punjab, HP   

{{{    

Two letters threatening that terror group Lashkar-e-Toiba(LeT) will blow up key temples in Punjab and Himachal Pradesh on June 5 to avenge the killing of al Qaeda chief Osama Bin Laden were received by police on Tuesday.

One letter warns Hindus against undertaking pilgrimage to Amarnath cave and Mata Vaishno Devi shrines in Jammu and Kashmir.

One of the letters, which were purported to have been written by LeT Area Commander Karim Ansari, warns Hindus against undertaking pilgrimage to the Amarnath cave and Mata Vaishno Devi shrines in Jammu and Kashmir.

SP Kamaljeet Singh Dhillon said he had been given the letters which were first received by the Mahant of local Sheetla Mata Mandir Kamal Kishor.

Another letter threatens that 8 important temples of Himachal Pradesh and several important temples of Punjab, including Hanuman Garhi Madir, Sheetla Mata Mandirs of Phagwara and Kapurthala, Shri Kali Mata Mandir of Patiala and Durgiana Mandir of Amritsar will be targeted with bombs.

The letters claim Lashkar-e-Toiba activists have entered Punjab which would be made the first target for taking revenge of bin Laden s death.

The letters warn certain prominent Hindu leaders were on the target of LeT and there will be largescale bloodshed of Hindus and Sikhs. They especially mention the names of Shiv Sena Presidents of Kapurthala, Patiala and Amritsar districts.

"If this warning is not heeded, then Hindus and Sikhs would be massacred," added the letter.

}}}      

More news on extent of PFI reveals true face of secularism of Congress

What is PFI (Popular Front of India)? It is an organization based on Islam.

It is involved in the incident of attack[cutting off the hands] on a Professor in Kerala (here or here).

Former CM of Kerala, a Communist, said that it wants to turn Kerala in to a Muslim majority state (here or here). {Pamphlets of PFI read," ....no force could prevent installation of an Islamic rule in the country if hard work was put up to secure this goal..."}

It has boasted about its efforts to make India an Islamic republic (here).

Former CM Achutanand was ridiculed for saying such thing and his observations, however, based on pamphlets confiscated by police, were taken as insult to all Muslims implying that Muslim organizations are not wrong in having such objectives but it is communalism if others report such incidents or to be more accurate others are criminals for opposing Islamic fascism.

In all this, present CM of Kerala proclaimed, when he was the opposition minister, that his party will co-operate in curtailing activities of PFI (here). Or even IUML, an ally of secular Congress, called PFI anti Islamic party (here).

Now the question is what Mr CM is going to do now - since he is in power now - to curtail its activities in the wake of more dangerous revelations about PFI? Is Mr CM going to ban PFI? Will IUML support banning PFI? I think we all know the answer.

Will Popular Front of India be banned?  
{{{    

NEW DELHI: Pakistan's intelligence agency, the ISI has reportedly claimed to have helped French authorities bust a major terror network. Mohammad Niaz who was arrested in Paris last week is believed to be the Indian link to the Al Qaeda - someone agencies believe is also recruiting members for the Popular Front's French arm.

Indian national Mohammed Niaz Abdul Rashid was arrested in Paris for his alleged al Qaeda connection. Authorities in Paris have so far remained tight lipped about what charges they would slap against Niaz but Indian investigators say Niaz was trying to set up a branch of this organisation - the Popular Front of India in France.

Sources have told CNN-IBN that Niaz has been in France since 2008 and was on a recruitment drive to create the Popular Front of France.

Two people from France, four French of Moroccan origin, one of Turkish origin and one Pakistani French national were part of his core group.

Sources in the Indian security establishment say this group had access to PFI literature which was being used to convince young men to join their organization............

}}}  

Moderate Islamic Pakistan? 67% want Pakistan to be more Islamic

67% of people of Pakistan want Islamization of Pakistan. 20% have no opinion. Only 13%, mostly secular liberals and minorities, oppose Islamization. These are the results of a Gallup poll (Gallup Pakistan).

No wonder then that Hindus have disappeared from Pakistan and Christians are on the way to extermination too (read this too). 

Even then, our Prime Minister says India and Pakistan should fight the menace of Islamic terrorism and  'Taliban like elements' together. Such is the grasp of our politicians and our security establishment. More importantly our pathetic school of intellectuals (comprising journalists and historians) will never really see what this 'Islamization' means as for them Islam has right to be what it wants but Hindus and Hinduism are just elements of fascism. But I am sure that what ever this 'Islamization' means but it is not secularism in its basic concept i.e. equality of all people irrespective of religion. 

67pc want Islamisation of society    

{{{     

LAHORE – As many as 67 per cent people of Pakistan want the government take steps for Islamisation, a clear indication that for whatever reasons they have lost faith in the existing system.

According to a survey carried out by Gilani Research Foundation, 31 per cent people want the government take the required steps at once. However, 48 per cent think that the needed steps should be taken one by one. People approached for survey had been asked: “In your opinion should the government take steps to Islamise the society?” These findings clearly mean that the claims made by various elements that Pakistan should be a secular state are totally baseless and contrary to the wishes of the people.

This is a unique kind of survey carried out by an organization (Gallup Pakistan) in a society where more than 90 per cent people are Muslims, no matter which sect they belong to. That 31 per cent people want ‘immediate’ steps for Islamisation means that they are totally disappointed with the ability of the existing system to solve their problems and want to switch over to the Islamic system, for the sake of which the country had been created in 1947.

According to the survey, 48 per cent people are for a gradual approach. In other words, they want the government to take the required steps one by one.

Without any iota of doubt, these people also pin their hopes on the Islamic system, but want it introduced gradually, which, ostensibly, means that no hasty step should be taken which had the potential to backfire.

Thirteen per cent of those approached for their opinions said there was no need for Islamization. Such people could be secularists, liberals or of the minority communities...........

}}}