Indian media found a way to prove Islamic tolerance by not reporting flashy incidents of 'Islamic intolerance' or some times twisting the facts while reporting. It is similar to the way our leftist-ideologues have whitewashed 500 years of persecution of Hindus and others by Muslim rulers and Islamic conquests which always have involved pillage, deportation, massacres, rape and enslavement. Most people do not even know about existence of institution of slavery in India during Islamic rule. Slavery was a word used by these enlightened historians to describe British rule in India but it was British who banned slavery.
Silence of media on many occasions which involved Muslims, like recent violent protests in New Delhi over a Mosque, deserves contempt (here, here). One blogger reported that when many people were pressing Bakhra Dutt for reasons behind media's black out on New Delhi violent protests, she simply said NDTV and others were simply following NBA guidelines (here). So, our self created 'secular ethics' dictate that violence by Muslims is genuine and understandable and it should go unreported while, there is nothing absolutely wrong with reporting Digvijay Singh's outlandish statements on so called Hindu terror with out any basis or analysis. This should be a concern to people who care about their future or freedom because such selective coverage means green signalling jihadi activities and condemning resistance to such acts; perfect example is episode of Deganga.
Here, I just mention few more incidents of Islamic intolerance which went unreported in media. The list is not exhaustive but one can visit websites of hindu samhati or south bengal herald for more news on Islamic jihad in West Bengal.