To dumb Times of India: Rinkel Kumari is kidnapped

Dumb is a lesser word to describe Times of India and its ethics of Journalism. Of course, this post well could be addressed to most of the news papers.

I predicted this kind of outcome when I first mentioned Rinkel Kumari in this blog.

The Supreme court of Pakistan first heard this case on March 26th, 2012.

So, lets go back to the report published by THE NATION (A Pakistan's news paper) on 27nth, March, 2012.

At that time, much of the media reported about what the Judge observed at the end when he announced in the court that Rinkel will be confined to some Islamic house so that she can think and take her decision freely, which is only a part of his observation. This is what the most of media reported. But why didn't they report the full observations made by the Judge? Can they ignore like that? Any way, lets read from THE NATION (HERE , go to the 7nth paragraph ) which gives more details on what the Judge said:

"After recording the statements of the girls, the chief justice first called Dr Lata’s parents inside the courtroom and later to Rinkle Kumari’s. A few minutes later everyone was allowed to enter the courtroom. Hearing the case in the open court, the chief justice said, “Such marriages are not taken in normal situation,” adding; “the criminal element could not be overruled in these cases.” He, however, cautioned that both the girls have embraced Islam and solemnized marriages and have been living with their husbands as wives."

Read the sentence in red color.

One other observation that can be made from this paragraph is that Judge read about this after speaking to the girls when no one was present in the court.

Even my first grade school going son will immediately understand what sentence in red color implies. But not the media. Joke on mental capability of their thinking. Look at the statement again:

"Such marriages are not taken in normal situation,” adding; “the criminal element could not be overruled in these cases.”"

What is this criminal element here?

Is Rinkel converting to Islam on her own? Is Rinkel marrying that guy? Obviously no. The only criminal element here is they were abducted or kidnapped. That is what he meant. That is what it means.

One does not have to be Einstien to see this basic reason.

And of course, the Judge proceeded to, at the end, force the girls to do hang themselves rather than he by simply confining them to an asylum, so that his hands are blemished from the blame or is it because his life will be under no threat.

In my previous post itself ( HERE ) , I wrote all these - how the girls have no choice - and also called it 'Islamic Justice'.

KNOW ABOUT RINKEL KUMARI AND HINDUS IN PAKISTAN

http://save-rinkel.blogspot.in/

(My hearty thanks to this blogger who made such a fantastic work.)

Rinkel Kumari: Pakistan's supreme court says no to her parents meeting her

In my last post related to Rinkel Kumari (Fayal Shah), I showed how this case was decided already and what Rinkle's future will be citing observations of Supreme Court Judge, which are in complete accord with Islamic laws ( THE GREAT ISLAMIC JUSTICE ). One should not forget that this case went to Supreme court because a Senator in USA raised this issue.

So, this hulla-bulla is nothing but publicity stunt by Pakistan to show to the world that lives and properties of religious minorities in its land are safe and secure despite the fact 20 to 25 Hindu girls and about 70 Christian girls are kidnapped per month.

One can feel the heart wrenching pain parents of Rinkle feel. In fact any human being with a heart can feel the torture she is going through.

But Pakistan is an Islamic country. And Islam is built upon utilitarian ethics and moral hollowness. Double standards and non-reciprocity are hallmarks of beliefs of Muslims. In addition, a Kafir can never be considered as an equal because all Non-Muslims are by-default the enemies of Islam and Muslims, because Allah has only decided to humiliate them at the hands of Muslims, because hearts of Muslims are filled with hatred towards disbelief by none other than Allah. All Non-Muslims are the vilest and worst of creatures.

And to expect understanding and justice in such system for any Non-Muslim can only be attributed to ignorance.

Hindu girls' case: Supreme Court rejects pleas of father, husband

Rinkel Kumari and The Great Islamic Justice

Note: I just added "plain truth" at the end of this post. In simple words it is "The Supreme Judge of Supreme Court of Pakistan has condoned kidnappings of Hindu girls and their forceful conversions and marriages to Muslim men"

Rinkel Kumari  was kidnapped. Converted to Islam. Married off to a Muslim guy.

In the morning, I referred to a online news portal which has reported:

 ""In Pakistan there is justice only for Muslims, justice is denied Hindus. Kill me here, now, in court. But do not send me back to the Darul-Aman [Koranic school] ... kill me". This is the desperate, heartbreaking outburst of Rinkel Kumari, a Hindu girl aged 19....."

http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Hindu-girl-tells-Supreme-Court-she-would-rather-die-than-convert-to-Islam-24358.html

This news portal is not a commercial entity. It was a Christian portal. One will never see any bias based on Hindus as it is equally critical of India and some Hindu organizations. So, I reported this incident. More over, it is a reputed one.

The only news I read about this girl in main stream media is in New York Times and which I did not refer to because I know how honest it is when coming to reporting about Islam. Never the less, one can read what it said by clicking on the below link:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/27/world/asia/no-quick-resolution-to-pakistani-case-of-rinkel-kumari-conversion-to-islam.html?_r=1

Similarly, there is another Christian news portal (Pakistan Christian Post), which reported:

"........urged Supreme Court of Pakistan to ensure safety of Hindu girls Rinkle kumari and Dr. Lata to whom it ordered to send to Darul-Aman on March 26, 2012, instead of their request to send them with their parents in court hearing."

(My Point: Now why so called Supreme Court wants to send this girl to some Islamic school when she requested SC to send her along with her parents? You will get the answer soon.)

The online Christian portal continues by reporting and conforming what was reported earlier (my first link) about Rinkel's statements. Below is the link:
http://www.pakistanchristianpost.com/viewnews.php?newsid=1799

After googling, I also found that Times of India reported this incident. The report can be read from below:

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-03-27/pakistan/31244436_1_pak-sc-conversion-shelter-home

TOI also reports that Rinkel wanted to go with her parents. (I suggest you to read comments in addition to reading the report.)

Now comes the nail in coffin.

And it is Pakistan's major news paper The Nation. One can read from below:

http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/islamabad/27-Mar-2012/sc-sends-girls-to-shelter-home-given-time-to-decide

And this tells the whole issue. It reports:

"The Supreme Court on Monday sent two Hindu girls, who had converted to Islam and got married to Muslim boys to Panah, a shelter home, so that they could make a decision of their future with ‘free will’ and with whom they want to go - parents or husbands.
Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry said, “Let these girls have some free time to think over and decide about their future themselves as now there is pressure of the court, police and their husbands’ parents on them.”"

(My point: Why all this non sense? Why differ the judgment until April 18nth?  This report also confirms earlier reports that Rinkel wants to go with her parents. Now should one be a Einstien to understand that she was kidnapped when she was pleading with Supreme Court Judge to let her go with her parents?)

The Nation continues to report:

 "...............one of the girls, Rinkle Kumari, whose new name after conversion is Faryal Bibi, while crying begged, “I want to go with my parents,” ......."

(My point: What more that girl could do in such atmosphere? Now comes the Honorable Supreme Court's observation. Hold your breadth.)

".......the chief justice said, “Such marriages are not taken in normal situation,” adding; “the criminal element could not be overruled in these cases.” ....."

(My point: Now, can there be any doubt that Rinkel Kumari was kidnapped? Now, if it can not be over ruled, why not strike off her conversion and her marriage? And we all can go home! It is not that simple.)

"................He, however, cautioned that both the girls have embraced Islam and solemnized marriages and have been living with their husbands as wives......."

(My points: THE GREAT ISLAMIC JUSTICE DELIVERED. 


It does not matter how she converted but she converted to Islam. And she can not go back to Hinduism as she becomes an apostate and punishment for apostasy is death. And Pakistan being an Islamic nation having Sharia being the ultimate judge, what else Supreme Court can do?


What kind of man really calls kidnapping and being confined forcefully as living together? Look at what the Judge says now.)

"........Justice Tariq Pervaiz said, “We also have to see this factor that in India Muslim girls convert to Hinduism.” ..."

(My point:  Why doesn't he mention Pakistan? It is because Islam prohibits Muslim women marrying Non-Muslim men. If any union takes place, it only can come after the guy converting to Islam. 


But why mention what happens in India? Hindu girls marrying Muslim guys outnumbers  Muslims girls marrying Hindu guys by 100 to 1 ratio. In any case, conversion is not needed.)

Like I said, it is great Islamic justice. It is Islamic logic.

P.S.   The SC Judge says the criminal elements in these type of marriages can not be ruled out and also in these cases. The he observes 'but they have converted to Islam'.


It means they can not go back to their original religion. It does not matter how they converted. It does not matter if they converted at the point of gun. Because such conversions are valid in Islam. Prophet Mohammad himself sets an example in this kind before he invaded Mecca. The judge has proved that the axiom of 'no compulsion in Islam' is false. In the first place, Islam itself never really meant what Islamic apologists say about the verse 2:256.   


The second point is his observation adds to veracity of Islamic law: No Muslim can ever change their religion. Once any one who converts to Islam - circumstances does not matter  - there is no going back because Islam requires that those Muslims leaving Islam must be put to death. Prophet himself said,"Kill any Muslim who changes his religion..".    


In the case of Rinkel Kumari, it is obvious that she has no choice of getting back to her original life as Islam forbiddens Muslims from leaving Isl.   


Now coming to marriage, from the observations of The Judge, it is obvious that he was implying Rinkel does not have any choice but to live with her husband. Why? Because in Islam once a woman enters a wedlock, it is not her wish to come out. Divorce is the choice of husband.


We can clearly see that line of argument of Judge - in the matter of conversion or marriage - is in complete accordance with Islamic law. Then, we should not be surprised as Pakistan is a declared Islamic state and Sharia law is the ultimate reference.


But, what pains me is the consequences of such observations by Supreme Court of Pakistan. Because, by default, The Judge has condoned and sanctioned kidnapping, forceful conversion of Hindu girls and subsequent marriage to Muslim man. It means, in the absence of any corrective measure or punishing the culprits, now, I am saddened to say that abductions of Hindu girls in Pakistan will increase significantly as Muslim  men realized that law can not do anything.

Heart breaking story of Rinkel Kumari (Faryal Shah), A Hindu girl in Pakistan

Rinkel was kidnapped;

She was forced to convert to Islam;

She was called Faryal Shah now;

She was married off to a wealthy Muslim guy;

The media reports:



It is clear that news reader was telling that Rinkel told the court that she converted to Islam on her own.

Most of the time it is not how it goes. The girl (could be a Hindu or a Christian) is simply forced to sign the documents infront of police or some judges. Or Muslims fill the court room and shout "Allah Akbar" to influence her statements, implicit in this kind of behavior is reminding girl about threats to herself and her family if she does not tell the court what they wanted to hear.

But media never mentions all these and therefore becomes accomplices in ongoing ethnic cleansing of Hindus from Pakistan.

Now, she tells Supreme Court (here) - Supreme Court ensured that no one was present in the court room when they recorded her statement-  that she was kidnapped.

Is this a new development? Way back, Human Rights Council of Pakistan has reported honestly about ongoing kidnappings of Hindu girls.

It is not all this.

Watching the video clip, one can see procession by Muslims celebrating this 'eventful' conversion and marriage. They knew that they kidnapped her, so why are they celebrating?

Because by kidnapping that girl and celebrating, they feel they are humiliating Hindus and Hindu community. By no means this is the lone event. It happens all the time in Pakistan. It happens all the time in Egypt, where Coptic Christian community is the victim.

Humiliating Non-Muslims is so important to Muslims and Islam that Sharia law contains (here) well developed rituals and regulations for humiliating and degrading Non-Muslims and these become part of beliefs of Muslims and also that they influence how Muslims behave towards Non-Muslims.

The worst is yet to reveal itself in this sad story of Rinkel Kumari.

Having told the court that she was converted forcibly, she more or less put herself in the direct line of rage of Muslims. More so, if she says she is still a Hindu, Muslims consider herself as an apostate which makes legal for any Muslim to kill her.

More importantly, Muslims believe that her family has breached the so called Dhimmah covenant, by bringing their daughter away from Islam - Dhimmah covenant requires that Non-Muslims should not stop another Non-Muslim from becoming a Muslim - which puts them in arms way of getting killed. Sometimes, Muslims attack entire community for their alleged insult of Islam even by one Non-Muslim.

Report - I referred to - already mentions about her family receiving death threats and about their hiding in some other place.

One can clearly see: This is Islam. This is 'Muslims'.

Hindu Girl (Rinkel Kumari) in Pakistan's Supreme Court: "Kill me here. But do not send me back to Koranic school."

When I reported a statement made by Pakistan's minister that 200 Hindu girls disappeared in recent months referring to a report, the report inhumanely mentions a Muslim journalist from Pakistan saying only few of these cases of kidnappings are true and some of these girls run away from parents to convert to Islam and to stay with their loved ones (here). The journo was referring to those hapless girls telling the court that they did convert and marry out of their own decision; never mentioned fact is she was forced to sign lot of documents (Just like Priyanka Todi was asked to sign papers; I should't have brought up this case here but it shows how pre-planned Muslim guys are in the cause of Islam).

Is there any choice for that hapless girl other than saying those things when court rooms are filled with Jihadists shouting "Allah Akbar" and few more hundreds of Jihadists waiting outside courts? There are even cases where parents of victim girl and their lawyers were not even allowed in to courts.

Indisputable truth in this kind of stories is police and judiciary become complicit to Islamic cause. Never mind that Human Rights Commission of Pakistan lamentably mentioned this in its report that 20 to 25 Hindu girls are kidnapped every month.

Hindu girl tells Supreme Court she would rather die than convert to Islam
{{{
"In Pakistan there is justice only for Muslims, justice is denied Hindus. Kill me here, now, in court. But do not send me back to the Darul-Aman [Koranic school] ... kill me". This is the desperate, heartbreaking outburst of Rinkel Kumari, a Hindu girl aged 19, who has entrusted her heartfelt appeal to the judges of the Supreme Court in Islamabad. Her story is similar to that of many other young women and girls belonging to religious minorities - Christians, Hindus, Sikhs, Ahmadis - kidnapped by extremist groups or individuals, most of the time lords or local mafia, which convert them by force and then marry them . And that is what the girl said on 26 March, before the judges of the capital's court.

The drama of Rinkel Kumari, a student of Mirpur Mathelo, a small village in the province of Sindh, began the evening of February 24: A handful of men seized her and delivered her a few hours later into the hands of a wealthy Muslim scholar, the man then called her parents, warning them that their daughter "wants to convert to Islam."  ...................
...........As often happens in these cases, even the judiciary is complicit: a local judge ordered that the girl should be given to the Muslims, because her conversion is "the result of a spontaneous decision" and also stated the marriage was above board. A claim that was repeated on February 27, at the hearing before the court, after which the girl was "renamed" Faryal Shah.

However, the story of Rinkel is not an isolated case: every month between 25 and 30 young people suffer similar abuses, for a yearly total of about 300 conversions and forced marriages. Hindu girls - but also Christian - who are torn from their family and delivered into the hands of their husbands / torturers.......
................
Speaking to AsiaNews Fr. Anwar Patras, the Diocese of Rawalpindi, condemned "with force" the kidnapping and forced conversion. "The Hindus in Sindh - adds the priest - live a hard life. The reality is getting harder for them, they are forced to migrate because the state is unable to protect them and their property.
}}}

Extra-ordinary thing in this case is every thing (behavior of Muslims) that was happening here is legal in Islam and in complete accordance with prophetic example i.e. Prophet Mohammad is the perfect example for Muslims to follow.

Now will Indian media report this incident? Earlier they reported this particular case probably with implicit assumption that she ran off on her own and Hindus are trying to create a scene but it is fashionable for these media to deride Hindus in every way they could.

Now if they stay silent and do not report, we can all rest assured that that 'implicit assumption' I mentioned above is their line.