Koran tagging Non-Muslims along with cattle and animals is merely an insult? (Part 1)

Islam & Hindu Initiative ( IHI ) is an Islamic organization.

They have a website and also a facebook page. On their facebook page, one will read:

The website is aimed at introducing Islam as it is to the Hindus, removing prevalent misconceptions about Islam and respond to attacks against Islam by some radical Hindu groups.

How do they go about doing it? By removing posts from their pages when proved they are wrong or blocking people from commenting on their page.

Islam is all about co-existence and mutual respect?

Of course, those who have read Koran and Islamic teachings knew it is a grand myth perpetuated by Muslim spokesmen.

Those who have political knowledge about how Islamic nations treat Non-Muslims knew that it is more than a delusion. 

Yet, most Non-Muslims chose to believe in that kind of delusions because it gives a sense of security.

Hindus are enemies of Islam and Hindus only deserved to be humiliated

It is not me who is saying that. It is the opinion of Islamic scholars and an Islamic website. Now, are they communal  and Islamophobic too? ( HERE )

Question put to an Islamic scholar: Is it permissible for us to hold a party to bid farewell to a non-Muslim who was working with us?.

Their answer:
Praise be to Allaah.

Holding a farewell party for a kaafir is a kind of honouring and respecting him, and they do not deserve to be honoured because they have disbelieved in Allaah and offended Him.

Imam Ahmad narrated with a saheeh isnaad from Abu Moosa that he said: I said to ‘Umar: “I have a Christian scribe.” He said, ‘What is wrong with you, may Allaah doom you?! Have you not heard that Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): ‘O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as Awliyaa’ (friends, protectors, helpers), they are but Awliyaa’ of each other’ [al-Maa’idah 5:51]? Why don’t you employ a haneef (i.e., a Muslim)?” I said: “O Ameer al-Mumineen, I benefit from his writing and his religion is his own affair.” He said: “I will not honour them when Allaah has humiliated them, and I would not want to be close to them when Allaah has cast them away.”

See Majmoo’ al-Fataawa, 25/327.

‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab also said with regard to the Christians in particular: “Humiliate them but do not wrong them, because they have offended Allaah in such a manner that no other people have ever done. 

Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) said, concerning the ruling on holding a farewell party for a kaafir when his work ends, and the ruling on offering condolences to a kaafir, and the ruling on attending the festivals of the kuffaar:

This is a question which includes several issues:

1 – Holding farewell parties for these kaafirs is undoubtedly a kind of honouring them and showing regret that they are leaving. All of that is haraam for the Muslim. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Do not initiate the greeting of salaam with the Jews and Christians, and if you meet them in the road push them towards the narrowest part of it.” The person who truly believes cannot honour any of the enemies of Allaah, and the kuffaar are the enemies of Allaah according to the text of the Qur’aan. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): 


“Whoever is an enemy to Allaah, His Angels, His Messengers, Jibreel (Gabriel) and Mikaa’eel (Michael), then verily, Allaah is an enemy to the disbelievers”

[al-Baqarah 2:98]

2 – Offering condolences to a kaafir if one of his loved ones – a friend or relative – dies. There is a difference of opinion among the scholars concerning this issue. Some of the scholars say that it is haraam to offer condolences to them, and some say that it is permissible. Some of them added further details and said that if that serves an interest, such as the hope that they may become Muslim and it may ward off their evil which could not be done except by offering condolences, then it is permissible, otherwise it is haraam.

The more correct view is if that offering condolences to them is regarded as a kind of honouring them, then it is haraam, otherwise we should look at what is in the best interests.

3 – Attending their festivals and taking part in their celebrations. If these are religious festivals such as Christmas then it is haraam to attend them, beyond any shadow of a doubt. Ibn al-Qayyim (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: It is not permissible to attend them according to the consensus of the scholars, and this was clearly stated by the fuqaha’ who followed the four imams in their books. And Allaah is the Source of strength.

Islam (or Sharia) on relations between Non-Muslims and Muslims; and Dhimmah

There is no shortage of Muslim spokesmen esp. living in Non-Muslim majority nations swearing by trite cliches  - one of them being Islam (or Sharia) teaches tolerance and respect  towards all faiths, which unfortunately has many takers among politicians and media people. Encompassing this line is the kind of relations between Non-Muslims and Muslims Islam envisages. So, what does Koran and sayings and traditions of Prophet Mohammad (collectively called Sunna) say about those relations? This is important because Sharia law - constitution of any Islamic state - is derived from these regarding how it should treat Non-Muslims living in Islamic state.

Jizya and its meaning (Part 2)

In understanding Jizya, it is worth to focus, if not engross, on distinctness of how Muslim scholars understood this verse 9:29 for 1400 years from the time of birth of Islam and how it was implemented too by Muslim rulers.

Jizya and its real meaning (Part 1)

In Indian history text books one learns that Non Muslims (Hindus) paid Jizya tax to Muslim rulers but why it was imposed on Hindus was never explained. If at all Jizya is explained then it is only in falseness and not even close to truth because authors write “Jizya has nothing to do with religion and this tax is more of political in nature”. Funny, isn’t it? The underlying reasons for this kind of tax and law is not believing in Islam and continuation of adhering to their ancient faiths, yet authors wanted every one to believe that the issue of religion has no role in this. Hmm! Making sense? Their point that this levying of Jizya is only political is half truth from the perspective that Islam is equally a politically ideology; not that authors intend to imply this. Their (Our left intellectuals and Historians) uncompromising effort, out right lies and deceptions to sanitize Islamic history of barbarianism and cruelty becomes itself a worthy science subject to scrutiny and appraisal.

Disbelievers in Allah's Hell; Non Muslims will only go to Hell.

Koran has more than 200 verses saying all Non Muslims, to be more precise who ever rejects Islam, will only go to Hell and burn there in fire for eternity. It describes hell in many ways. Initially Mohammad used this concept of Hell and fire to gain the followers but to of no avail. One can reach this conclusion because 68% of verses saying final place of disbelievers is Hell were revealed in Mecca, where he was weak. In Medina, where he took to fighting and plundering caravans obviously then, there was no need for Hell as means of persuasion as sword and booty did all the tricks.

Koran compares Non Muslims with animals like Cattle, Apes and Pigs

In 2009, a explosive device went off in Karachi and killed at least 25 Shi'a Muslims and Pakistan's Interior Minister responded to this by saying that Muslim terrorist who committed this act is worse than an infidel (Kafir), according to a Reuters report:

A suicide bomber blew up a Shi'ite Muslim procession in Pakistan's commercial capital Karachi on Monday, killing at least 25 people, in an attack that underscored multiple security challenges facing the U.S. ally..... Interior Minister Rehman Malik said at least 25 people were killed and about 50 wounded in Karachi, a major transit point for military and other supplies to Afghanistan for the U.S- and Nato-led anti-insurgency effort.

Malik said extremists wanted to destabilize Pakistan.

"Whoever has done this, he cannot be a Muslim. He is worse than an infidel," he told reporters.

One can not be sure what the Minister intend to imply, but according to the Koran, a Non Muslim is the worst creature among all the creations by Allah. It is pertinent to recall that Islam believes that a Man is the best creation of Allah among all the creations by him. Having said Man is the best and then it says Non Muslims are the worst among all the creatures and of course Muslims are the best. So we have a section of Humanity (Muslims) at the top and remaining section (Non Muslims) at the bottom on the scale of worthiness of creatures on this earth.

Allah misguides Non Muslims and sends more Shaitans to mislead them!

At the core of Islam's theology is the belief that Allah is the only god and he is the creator of Universe and every thing in it. In Koran, Allah says he created mankind for a purpose and the purpose is that they serve him by worshiping him alone. See the following verse:

051.056,YUSUF ALI: I have only created Jinns and men, that they may serve Me.
PICKTHAL: I created the jinn and humankind only that they might worship Me.
SHAKIR: And I have not created the jinn and the men except that they should serve Me.

Koran prohibits friendship between Muslims and Non Muslims; And Taqiyya

Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, a 23 year old teenager, who unsuccessfully attempted to detonate a PETN explosive on Christmas day on the Detroit bound plane, is a son of wealthy former banker. Subsequently upon his arrest and investigation, it is reported by many News Papers that he under the id farouk1986 posted his thoughts in facebook and in an Islamic website. Here, though not all postings are completely relevant to this main article but it is worth to have a look, are those postings.

Islamic Tolerance: What does Koran say about Non Muslims?

We often hear and see Muslims and their apologists making statements or writing in news papers wanting us to believe that Koran guides Muslims to respect people of other religions and their belief systems. We have seen even one Bollywood star making a claim that he himself read Koran and it prohibits killing of innocent people. (Please remember and note that Islamic dictionary has its own definitions for words like peace, tolerance and innocence.) They even say that Islam means ‘peace’ trying to put a kinder, gentler and tolerant decorating cloth, that is not existent, over their Islam’s dreaded, inhuman and barbaric ideology. Nothing is further from truth than this kind of statements by Muslims.

Koran says Muslims and Non Muslims are not equal; Muslims are better than Christians, Hindus and Jews.

If one has a relative working in Saudi Arabia, suppose he had unnatural death, then according to Saudi Islamic law (Read the section named 'Settlement of Death Compensation Claims' and 5th point in this section; at the end of this post, this section will be presented i.e. pasted.), blood money (Diyya) should be paid to the the family of the victim by the culprit and the amount to be paid depends on the religion and gender of the victim. This amount of the blood money prescribed for a Non Muslim is less than that is prescribed for a Muslim.

If the victim is a Muslim, then the amount to be paid is SR1,00,000/-, for a Christian or a Jew, it is SR50,000/- and if the victim is Hindu it is about SR6,666.66/-.

What is Saudi Arabia? A radical Islamic country? Well ignorant columnists under the influence of feigning Islamists say this in news papers. It is the birth place of Mohammad and Islam. Koran and Sunna are its constitution. Muslims feel it is a perfect example as a country for Muslims. Thinking of Saudi Arabia as a radical Islamic country can only be termed as puerile and it is testimony to ones ignorance of Islam itself.