Saturday, December 31, 2011

So called inter religious marriages with Islam create harmony or lead to 'honor killings'?

An Arabic Islamic scholar in an effort to show off generosity of Islam towards Non-Muslims says, "Islam is generous as it allows Muslim men to marry Non Muslim women.". But, this gentleman could at-least be forgiven for being honest on Islamic law, which allows Muslim men to marry Non-Muslim women and forbids Muslim women marrying Non-Muslim men.

Secular and liberal face of Islam in India, as showcased by Indian Main stream media (esp. English), Ashgar Ali Engineer blatantly lies that Islam allows inter religious marriages in presenting non-existent benign face of Islam towards Non-Muslims.

Islamic law (SHARIA LAW) simply sanctions death penalty to Non-Muslim men for marrying  Muslim women; this grossly double standard in Islamic law (SHARIA LAW) could be the cause for collapse of Non Islamic cultures.

Since, in the present day world, many Muslims are living in Non-Islamic states - say India -, what would happen if Muslim women develop any kind of relation with Non-Muslim men? Read the following stories:

1. A Muslim father beats his underage daughter to death.  
2. A Muslim goes on  rampage 'killing his family'.

One can read further this kind of stories from here.

Unpleasant truth, which will never be told by media or any politician, is that Islam supports such honor killings, which was shown in one of my earlier posts. Thinking better to recalling how Islam supports honor killing i.e. parents killing their off spring, one can read from here.

P.S. The Santa Killer Was a Religion of Peacer  
If I wanted to murder my family or destroy a historic university and yet not give my faith a bad name in the press, I would convert to the Religion of Peace.

Yep, if you belong to that lovely creed, you can snap on Christmas and execute your entire clan or burn down a famous college, and the media won’t say shizzle about your faith or your motivation for mayhem. Sa-weet, eh, mass murderers?

Case in point. Aziz Yazdanpanah, known only as the “Santa Killer,” was a follower of this “amazing faith” who slaughtered his family on Christmas Day after his wife dumped him and his 19-year-old daughter wouldn’t stop dating a non-Religion of Peacer. The adherents of said faith refer to this act as an “honor killing,” and when it occurs police and the press reckon it unworthy of unearthing and condemning publicly........

So, how did the truth revealing journalists report this Christmas Day carnage enacted by a male member of the Peace People? Here’s how: They called Aziz the “Santa Killer” who was down on his financial and relational luck whom his neighbors regarded as a decent gent who loved his family and liked to do yard work.

Sunday, December 25, 2011

Merry Christmas

I just watched these two videos and found them to be reflection of what is taking place, i.e. evil winning, in present day world, thanks to our politically correct and multi-culturalist politicians and media.

Hoping, one thinks over these.

Monday, June 13, 2011

New version of "slay the idolaters when forbidden months are over....": Ahmadis fit to be killed

Ahmadiyya Muslim community! Its adherents, Ahmadis, consider them selves as a sect of Islam and their places of worship are also called mosques. Ahmadis differ from main stream Islam in many ways, the most important one being acceptance of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad - founder of Ahmadiyya movement - as Prophet.

But, Islam considers Prophet Mohammad to be the last prophet before the day of the Judgment; this is the first of 5 pillars of Islam: shahada (saying 'Allah is the only God and Mohammad is messenger'). Muslims say that belief of Ahmadis regarding the prophet-hood violates basic tenets of Islam thus, their sect can not be a part of Islam.

Probably in seventies, Pakistan Govt. passed a law that declared Ahmadiyya sect [3 to 4 million Ahmadis live in Pakistan] as non-Islamic. But, persecution of and violence against Ahmadis continues in Pakistan and li last 3 years it increased sharply like attacks on two Ahmadiyya mosques killing 95 people (here).

Now, pamphlets seems to be in circulation saying that Ahmadis are fit to be killed. This may not be like a open command like Allah issued in Koran in the verse 9:5: "when sacred months have passed, fight and slay the idolaters wherever you find them, sieze them, besiege them and prepare for them every ambush.....", nevertheless, it tells about degree of intolerance that can be found in Islam with respect to non-Muslims.

Sunday, June 12, 2011

Reports of Victims of Forced Conversions to Islam, Rapes and Forced Marriages

This is not new. From the time Islam was founded to present day, this kind of terrorization, humiliation of non-Muslims - enslaving non-Muslim women sexually - by Muslims is always in practice. It will continue in to future because media and people, in general, have refused to see and counter it. Those who spoke on this were condemned and vilified as communal. These atrocities will continue in to future because Muslims do not see them wrong as it follows example of Prophet and also that they believe that they will be rewarded by Allah.

Earlier, this blog reported on notice of rise in kidnapping of Coptic girls (here).

Some people, in compulsion of their political ideology or fancy beliefs, try to deny Islamic intolerance towards all non-Muslims - which is inherent to and a necessity of Islamic faith (one can read a very interesting one on this from here).

For some, to speak against these gruesome acts or Islamic beliefs is costly and dangerous because of danger of being branded as communal. Some feel that staying in ignorance of Islamic tenets  and doctrines, deliberately, and not criticizing Islam and its beliefs is ethical and testimony to their liberal and secular outlook.

So, the evil - that is Islam - will continue to advance. Tolerating intolerance is not a virtue; it is a vice.

{{{ [Source]  

LAHORE -- In Pakistan forced conversions to Islam, rapes and forced marriages are on the rise.

According to a story by Agenzia Fides (the information service of the Pontifical Mission Societies), the victims are mostly Hindu and Christian girls, belonging to religious minorities. The information came from Fides' local sources.

Fides said this has been a worrying phenomenon for the Church in Pakistan for some time, and one that the Church is trying to address. It is looking for institutional cooperation, but the process is an uphill battle.

"The Christian girls are the weakest and most vulnerable, because their communities are poor, defenseless and marginalized, therefore easily exposed to harassment and threats. Often they do not even have the courage to denounce the violence," a sister told Fides.

The sister hides and assists the girls who have managed to escape, Fides said.

The sister said, "But the trend is worrying: There are hundreds of cases a year registered and those that come to light are only a fraction."

Fides said in a society that tolerates discrimination of religious minorities, especially of women, the dominant religion and related social position are used to impose tyranny.

A report sent to Fides by the Center for Legal Assistance and Settlement (CLAAS), which takes care of legal assistance for Christians who are discriminated against and persecuted in Pakistan, confirmed this issue. It reported a number of troubling situations, occurring mainly in the province of Punjab.

Fides said Sidra Bibi, a 14-year-old Christian in the district of Sheikhupura in Punjab, is the daughter of a worker in the cotton industry. A Muslim from the village had his eye on her and began to molest her. He eventually abducted and raped her, before threatening her with death.

Physically and psychologically abused, the girl became pregnant.

Fides said she managed to escape from her captor, and is now back with her family. Police have refused to accept her complaint, Fides said, and now CLAAS lawyers are handling the case.

Fides said Tina Barkat, a 28-year-old-Christian, was approached by a Muslim friend who, after being friends with her for several months, asked her to convert to Islam. Her family began to read her verses of the Koran, kidnaped and threatened her, and then gave her in marriage to a Muslim family member. Her attorneys have filed a motion to dissolve the marriage.

Fides said a similar situation has occurred to Samina Ayub, a 17-year-old Christian, who lives with her family near Lahore. Kidnaped by a Muslim, she was forcibly converted to Islam, renamed Fatima Bibi, and forced to marry in the Muslim tradition.

Fides said her family reported the abduction, but police have not prosecuted those responsible. The case remains unsolved, and her family is asking for help from everyone interested in saving Samina.

Fides said Shazia Bibi, a 19-year-old Christian from Gujranwala, in Punjab, worked as a maid in the house of a Muslim woman, the owner of a grocery store. The Muslim boy from the store was in love with Shazia. In collaboration with the owner, they held a "conversion" and forced her into marriage. Fides said the plan was successful, but now as a result of intervention from Shazia's family the case has ended up in court.

In addition, Fides said, two other Christian girls, Uzma Bibi, 15, and from Gulberg, and Saira Bibi, 20, a nurse from Lahore, were abducted by Muslim neighbors, converted to Islam and then forced to marry in an Islamic ceremony.

Fides said the horrified families of the girls have reclaimed their daughters, and the cases are currently before the High Court of Lahore, represented by lawyers provided by CLAAS.

Further reading: Beware Hindu girls 

A Muslim in UK beaten for leaving Islam?

However one think on secularism, it is simply incompatible with Islam. Concept of freedom of religion is never a part of Islamic discourse. Slogan of Muslim apologists - like Sultan Shahin, Ashghar Ali Engineer - that "there is no compulsion in Islam" is an effort in direction of misguiding non-Muslims and to keep them in false sense of security.

Prophet said, "If somebody (Muslim) discards his religion, kill him." (Sahih Bukhari; vol. 4, book 52, # 260)

Prophet said, "The blood of a Muslim who confesses that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that I am His Apostle, cannot be shed except in three cases: In Qisas for murder, a married person who commits illegal sexual intercourse and the one who reverts from Islam (apostate) and leaves the Muslims."(Sahih Bukhari; vol. 9, book 83, # 17)

Reliance of Traveller, an English version version of "Umdat as-Salik wa 'Uddat an-Nasik" - Sharia law book [fiqh] of Shafi'i school of Sunni Islam - and also certified by Al-Azhar university [most influential institute in Sunni Islam] says in divison 'o' and section 8 that leaving Islam is the ugliest form of unbelief and clause @o8.1 says (here):
When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed.
Maududi, founder of Jamaat-e-Islaami, supports death penalty for apostasy on the basis of Koran too and one can read it here

If Islamic states deny freedom of religion through laws and arresting apostates, in non-Muslim countries one can always find some (enough) pious Muslims enforcing this code of sharia law:" death to or violence on Muslims who convert to other religions. The effect is the same because we do not see any condemnation of such heinous acts by media or so called liberal guardians and spokesmen of morality and this kind only encourages more Muslims to act in such punitive manner. 

A MAN has been locked up for attacking another man in the street with a plank of wood.

Nottingham Crown Court heard that Sher Ahmadzai, 20, hit his victim with a metre-long plank, causing him to fall over during the attack in Radford.

Another man then started punching and kicking the fallen man in the face.

The victim escaped without serious injury but was left with a sore jaw and leg pain.

The court heard Ahmadzai knew his victim and both were members of the Afghan community.

The man was of Muslim faith but converted to Christianity after claiming asylum here.

"This did not sit well with the defendant," said prosecutor Paul Stimson.

"That culminated in the assault in October last year in Hartley Road.".............

Saturday, June 11, 2011

Christians in Australia openly protest at Islamic billboard saying 'Jesus is a Prophet of Islam'

When Allah in Koran has permitted pillage (or robbery), murder, enslaving and rape to advance Islam and eradicate infidelity or disbelief, lies and half truths - in promotion of Islam - never come in to conscience of Islamists and they are perfectly allowed. Especially, the present day reality of inferiority of Muslim nations with respect to infidel nations in regard to military strength, lies and half truths become very handy too. Finally, more importantly, - to poke more fun to at nose of infidels - these lies and half truths can be sold freely using concepts of infidels like freedom of expression and freedom of religion. Money for advertising such lies is never a problem too as Muslims are flush with petro dollars and there are plenty of clients for these petro dollars in non-Muslim majority nations.

In Australia, this is what Muslims are trying to do by raising billboards depicting Jesus as a Prophet of Islam, probably intended for double purpose of showing Islam as tolerant, inclusive and also for gaining new converts.  
One of many Muslim-erected billboards that have infuriated Christians

But it does not tell the whole picture esp. about how different concept of Jesus in Islam is from concept of Jesus in Christianity .

It is never really difficult to see such lies if we read every day news coming from Islamic nations in the net where in Islamic Govt.s keep arresting Muslims who left Islam to Christianity and Christians accused of proselytizing for Christianity. Many Islamic nations simply ban other religions from propagating their faith in their countries. In to Saudi Arabia, you can not take crosses, Bibles and pictures of Jesus. Christians (for that matter, all non-Muslims) are forbidden to celebrate their festivals in public place.

[Note: To humiliate non-Muslims further, all these Islamic nations send billions of petro dollars for proselytizing in non-Muslim majority countries.]

Or for that matter, try to erect a billboard in an Islamic nation telling Jesus was crucified on cross and is the son of God! Reaction from Muslims and Islamic Government will be what we can only call intolerance -probably with charges of blasphemy on people responsible for those billboards.

So, should't what Muslims are saying in this billboard contradict what Islamic nations are practicing? Not exactly in terms of Islamic theology as Islam sees itself as the only true religion and final message with Jesus being one in line of Prophets sent by God to guide mankind and of course, Prophet Mohammad being the last, the seal of all Prophets and the greatest. In fact it insults Christianity further by saying that Jesus is not a son of God, blatantly lying on what constitutes Trinity and, ultimately, Jesus is not crucified on cross as the following verses say:
O People of the Scripture! Do not exaggerate in your religion nor utter aught concerning Allah save the truth. The Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, was only a messenger of Allah, and His word which He conveyed unto Mary, and a spirit from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers,......... (4:171, Pickthall)
And because of their saying: We slew the Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, Allah's messenger - they slew him not nor crucified him, but it appeared so unto them; and lo! those who disagree concerning it are in doubt thereof; they have no knowledge thereof save pursuit of a conjecture; they slew him not for certain. (4:157, Pickthall)
The Jews call 'Uzair a son of Allah, and the Christians call Christ the son of Allah. That is a saying from their mouth; (in this) they but imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say. Allah's curse be on them: how they are deluded away from the Truth! "(9:30, Pickthall)
Similar is the case with Bible when Muslims say they respect Bible. But which Bible? Bible that never existed. What Muslims do not tell is their belief of present day Bible being corrupted.

According to Muslims coming of Prophet Mohammad was mentioned in Bible but this was removed by Christians. Since, present day [or at any time] Bible never mentioned anything like it, Muslims claim that - as always with out any proof and like in numerous occasions - this was removed thus, Bible was corrupted. If one wants more proof, they can read about reports on Muslims in Pakistan demanding banning of Bible (here, here).
"From those, too, who call themselves Christians, We did take a covenant, but they forgot a good part of the message that was sent them: so we estranged them, with enmity and hatred between the one and the other, to the day of judgment. And soon will Allah show them what it is they have done." (5:14, Yusuf Ali)
Such is the nature of Islam, as it exists in Koran, legalizing mocking of every other religion.

Muslim billboard campaign that declares Jesus a 'prophet of Islam' causes outrage  
.........Jesus is sometimes invoked to assert some sort of commonality between Muslims and Christians, implying that Muslims, too, 'believe in Jesus'.
But Muslims, and the Koran, deny the central Christian beliefs of Jesus' divinity, crucifixion and resurrection.
Elsewhere on its website, Mypeace states that 'the Qur’an repeatedly reminds that Jesus was a human prophet sent by God, not part of God Himself'.
Julian Porteous, auxiliary bishop at the Catholic Archdiocese of Sydney, told the website: 'In Australia with its Christian heritage a billboard carrying the statement ‘Jesus A prophet of Islam’ is provocative and offensive to Christians.' 
'Central to Christianity is the belief that Jesus Christ is more than a prophet,” he said. 
'He is the Son of God. He is acclaimed Lord and Savior of humanity. This statement is a direct assault on Christian beliefs.'
Urging Mypeace to take down the posters, Bishop Porteous said that religions should avoid offending people of different faiths.   

Wednesday, June 8, 2011

Muslim members of Punjab Assembly (Pakistan) oppose a Christian presenting budget and replace him with a Muslim

Islam of terrorists is not real Islam! Islamic extremists are a tiny minority! We just keep reading these or variations of these statements.

Most people try to understand Islam from point of view of terrorism ignoring and forgetting the fact that terrorism is just a tactic or means to achieve political goals. Islam - being political at its core - is imperialist (supremacist) in its (political) ideology supported by religious dogma filled with with universal claims of Islam is the true religion and others are falsehood, Islam is the light and others are darkness, Muslims are superior and the best of humanity while non-Muslims are the vilest of all creatures and are like vermin. For better of humanity, this vermin should be defeated and subjugated.

For no other reason, all most all Muslim majority nations reject secularism, declare themselves as Islamic nations, restrict freedom of religion and are the only ones to form an organization based solely on religion.

It is these supremacist beliefs - coupled with belief of victim-hood and inferior status thus, feeling of injustice because they should be powerful and ruling class - that guide popular movements in Islamic nations. In Islamic law, a Muslim is always above non-Muslim in every aspect of life - with friendship between Muslims and non-Muslims is prohibited by Allah in Koran - and all non-Muslims should be excluded from Islamic Govt..

It is precisely these beliefs that are behind legislative members of Punjab(Pakistan) Assembly objecting to a Christian presenting budget.

The reason mentioned in news report i.e. fear of losing votes from 'conservative' Muslims should tell how bogus the claim of only a tiny minority of Muslims being extremists by Islamic apologists and media is.

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

Seema Chisthi: Defense of Islam

Alliance between Islamists and Communists is not just legendary. It is still very much in existence and for Islamists these leftist ideologues are just useful idiots who could be dealt with after they assume power just like, (Late) Khomeini, after coming to power, has thousands of communists put to death who initially supported his revolution. Yet, leftists remain blindfolded about Islamic ideology because of their shared hatred towards US, democracy and freedom.

I do not know much about Ms Seema Chisthi, on her religion and her political ideology, except that she is wife of Mr Sitaram Yechuri, an important leader of CPI(M), and an editor in Indian Express.

Considering the possibility of her having leftist leanings and being an atheist, one can not be surprised to see her scathing contempt for Hinduism and her frequent vitriol against BJP.

But, what I am surprised to find is that in an article she wrote for Indian Express under the title 'Taking up the defense of Islam' (her original article can be read from this link) she literally extolls the non-existing virtues of Islam and tells us about how one Islamic scholar from Pakistan, Dr Tahir-ul-Qadri, issues fatwas against terrorism and explains present day Islamic terrorism is not real Islam. But, she never ventures in to Islamic theology - may be, she is not familiar - nor tries to crosscheck some historical facts mentioned by her. It is unbelievable that she could write this piece! When I tried to think what made her to turn in to such a miserable apologist for Islamic supremacism, I could only think of present day fashionable trend of writing against Hinduism and praising other religions.

Overall, who needs facts! not definitely our main stream media which completely ignores or conceals Islamic extremism in India from violence by some Muslim groups to what some Ulema are saying. One can not expect politically correct media to write what Sharia law says but they should at-least stop publishing this kind of  views as it is bound to have some impact on some readers and emboldens Islamic extremists further.

Note: Excerpts from her article are in italics and blocks with background and my comments are below.

Saturday, June 4, 2011

Nonie Darwish (A Former Muslim): Solving poverty of Muslims - The Islamic way

In my few discussions with Muslims on net about Islam, one question I put up is what was the profession of Prophet Mohammad and his companions (sahaba) during their stay in Medina for full 10 years. How did they earn their living? Silence or some stupid justifications for acts of their Prophet is the normal reaction from Muslims. The correct answer is plundering trade caravans of non-Muslims(Meccans) and villages through raids.

One can read about one such raid, first one, called Nakhla raid from here. One can also read following Hadith and quotes for better understanding of what Ms Darwish has written.
Allah's Apostle said: "I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah's Apostle, and offer the prayers perfectly and give the obligatory charity, so if they perform a that, then they save their lives an property from me except for Islamic laws and then their reckoning (accounts) will be done by Allah."(Sahih Bukhari; Vol. 1, Book 2,# 25)
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been given five things which were not given to any amongst the Prophets before me. These are:
1. Allah made me victorious by terror (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month's journey.
2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for praying and a thing to perform Tayammum. Therefore my followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.
3. The booty has been made Halal (lawful) for me (and was not made so for anyone else).
4. Every Prophet used to be sent to his nation exclusively but I have been sent 1o all mankind.
5. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of Resurrection.)
(Sahih Bukhari; Vol. 1, Book 8,# 429)
Allah's Apostle said, "Booty has been made legal for me." (Sahih Bukhari; Vol. 4, Book 53,# 351)
We said to 'Umar bin Al-Khattab, Jo Chief of the believers! Advise us." He said, "I advise you to fulfill Allah's Convention (made with the Dhimmis) as it is the convention of your Prophet and the source of the livelihood of your dependents. (i.e. the taxes from the Dhimmis.)” (Sahih Bukhari; Vol. 4, Book 53, # 388)
Prophet Mohammad said, "Survival of my community rests on the hoofs of its horses and the points of its lances; as long as they keep from tilling the fields; once they began to do that they will become as other men."
(G.E. von Grunebaum, Classical Islam: A History 600-1258(London): Allen and Unwin, 1970, p.57.)
"I will reserve comment on what is in the city I have captured", Amr ibn al-As, the conqueror of Egypt, reported to Umar [Second caliph and father-in-law of Prophet Mohammad] upon the occupation of the port town of Alexandria, " aside from saying that I have seized .... forty thousand poll tax paying Jews....". He was peremptorily ordered to ship a year's supply of food to Medina for upkeep of the Muslim community, which he dutifully did. [EFRAIM KARSH; Islamic Imperialism (A History); page 26; he referred to
(Ibn Sa'd, a'-Tabaqat al-Kubra (Cairo: Dar al-Tahrir,1968), Vol.3, pp.77,157-58)
(Late)Dr. Muhammad Muhsin Khan - co-author of Noble Koran and translator of Hadith of Sahih Bukhari in to English from Arabic - writes on Jihad, in a foot note to the verse 2:190 in Noble Koran and also in introduction to the book on Jihad in Sahih Bukhari, that:
"Jihad is holy fighting in Allah’s Cause with full force of numbers and weaponry. It is given the utmost importance in Islam and is one of its pillars. By Jihad Islam is established, Allah’s Word is made superior (which means only Allah has the right to be worshiped), and Islam is propagated. By abandoning Jihad Islam is destroyed and Muslims fall into an inferior position; their honor is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish. Jihad is an obligatory duty in Islam on every Muslim. He who tries to escape from this duty, or does not fulfill this duty, dies with one of the qualities of a hypocrite."
All this also can be viewed from the background of Prophet Mohammad planned and executed 84 wars (or raids) in 9 years which turns in to one per every 6 weeks. But the real problem is with Koran saying about Prophet Mohammad that he is an example for all Muslims to follow for eternity and is the perfect human (ideal man) in the history of mankind. And this what Nonie Darwish also mentions.

This article originally appeared in (here).

Malaysian Muslim women launch obedient wife club

Prophet Mohammad said that devout and good Muslim women are those who maintain chastity and are obedient to their husbands (also the verse 4:34). Prophet further said that a woman can not serve Allah with out carrying the right of her husband. In fact, when a Muslim woman dies she will go to heaven if only her husband is pleased with her.

Prophet said many more and they can be read from here.

In April, a Muslim MP in Malaysia said that Muslim men are having extra marital relations because women(wives) are neglecting their duty and are not obedient (here):
Malaysian men have extramarital sex because of “wives who neglect their responsibilities” to their husbands, a Malaysian lawmaker told Parliament on Thursday, outraging women’s groups.
Husbands driving home after work see things that are sexually arousing and go to their wives to ease their urges,” said independent lawmaker Ibrahim Ali, according to online portal Malaysiakini.
“But when they come home to their wives, they will say, ‘wait, I’m cooking,’ or ‘wait, I’m getting ready to visit relatives’,” Ibrahim said.
In Islam, wives are supposed to stop everything to fulfill their husband’s demands.”
So now, we have some Muslim women in Malaysia volonteering to help Muslim women being more obedient to their husbands so that their husbands do not go astray and they formed a club for this purpose.

AFP - A group of Malaysian Muslim women say they will fight divorce, domestic violence and other problems -- by appealing to wives to be more obedient, according to one of the organisers.
Maznah Taufik said "The Obedient Wife Club" being launched Saturday is aimed at drawing women who will be taught how to please their husbands better to prevent them from straying or misbehaving.
"We just want to ask all the wives to be obedient wives so that there will be fewer problems in our society," such as infidelity, divorce and domestic violence, she told AFP.
"Obedient wife means they are trying to entertain their husbands, not only taking care of their food and clothes," Maznah said. "They have to obey their husbands. That's the way Islam also asks."
Malaysia is a Muslim-majority country, with some 60 percent of the population practicing the religion, alongside large ethnic Chinese and Indian communities who are mostly Buddhist, Hindu and Christian.
According to local media, the country's divorce rate doubled from 2002 to 2009, with rates higher among Muslims than non-Muslims.
Maznah said it was also the men's responsibility to teach their wives to be obedient.
"Some wives, they just want to get married for leisure but they don't know the responsibility," she said.
"To entertain their husbands is compulsory. If she doesn't do this, the husband will look for another woman... and the house will break down."..........

Or one can read this: Malaysian women urge wives to be 'whores in bed'  

A Saudi cleric to infidels: Convert to Islam or Pay Jizya or Embrace death

Of course, there is no compulsion in Islam!!!! When ever a non-Muslim (or an Ex-Muslim) tells the truth about Islam - like the ones being told by this Saudi cleric - he will be branded as communal or as an Islamophobe.

URL address: 

Friday, June 3, 2011

A Saudi Sheik: Only thing Muslims are demanding is Islam rule the world once again

URL address:

These scholars must be having amnesia or bad knowledge (or sense) of history. The Islamic supremacist logic is if Muslims kill innocent people, it is magnificent and compassion or will be termed as un-Islamic. But conquests by non-Muslims are tragedies. 

Islam explained in simple words by a Muslim

One can see how twisted logic of Islam is? But this is what Koran says in verses 9:005 and 9:029.

One can also see how definitions of various words change when Muslims use them i.e. here the word 'friendship'. One group pays Jizya for protection or not to get killed and other group calls this friendship.

URL address for above video: 

LeT threatens Hindus of massacres if they make pilgrimage to Amaranath shrine

LeT (Lashkar-e-Toiba) has threatened Hindus on making any pilgrimage to Amaranath and Vaishno Devi shrines in Jammu and Kashmir. Lets ask what big difference this makes to Hindus and also how different it is from present situation and policies of present Govt.. Below is the brief summary w.r.t. Kashmir:

1.    Hindus and Sikhs have been expelled from valley 20 years back.

2.    Recently, Govt. of Jammu and Kashmir has literally imposed Jizya tax on Hindu pilgrims to Amaranath cave shrine; yet, our central Govt. under Congress and Ms Sonia, which gives highest importance to principle of secularism, neither said anything nor did anything with regard to this Jizya tax. Then, secularism in India is for Hindus only. To question this Jizya tax will only invite the label of communal from our secular media (here).

3.    The same Govt., J and K, has kicked out a Christian pastor - who is living there since 1963 - from valley on the charges that he is proselytizing. This too has not raised any outrage from secularists or intellectuals or liberals. But a second look tells it may not be their fault completely because media simply has not reported this. But one can only imagine how the reaction will be from media, pseudo secularists and liberal terrorists  if some BJP state Govt. has expelled some Christian missionary (here or here).

4.    J and K Govt. has literally blocked BJP leaders from hoisting National flag in Sri Nagar on republic day with complete support from Central Govt. (here). The attempt of BJP was labelled as communal by various political parties and media commentators. The actions of J & K Govt. as in (2) and (3) are not communal but hoisting flag is communal according to these enlightened people and opinion makers! All this means we Indians unofficially have approved and stamped Islamic imperialism over non-Muslims. Sentiments of Muslims are above laws and constitution.

5.   So, how does Govt. address some of these inequities like Jizya on pilgrimage to Hindu shrines? Get a phony Swamy like Agnivesh - created by self serving media, Congress(I) and Ms Sonia - to do its job! Far from getting Jizya on Hindus removed, it is telling Hindus, through the ugly mouth of Agnivesh, that pilgrimage to Amaranath and Vaishno Devi shrines is not important, in fact pilgrimage is ridiculous (here). Probably, only in India such logic can be sold and people and media buy it with aplomb. Yet again, up-holding a law is not important but Hindus adjusting to Islamic imperialism is the proper course.

This is the standard procedure all over the world: whether Muslims are in minority or majority, it is for non-Muslims to make adjustments with Islamic culture of imperialism like Muslims demanding imposition of sharia. No wonder then, Islamic organizations make such outrageous demands and indulge in large scale violence against non-Muslims.

LeT threatens to blow up temples in Punjab, HP   

Two letters threatening that terror group Lashkar-e-Toiba(LeT) will blow up key temples in Punjab and Himachal Pradesh on June 5 to avenge the killing of al Qaeda chief Osama Bin Laden were received by police on Tuesday.
One letter warns Hindus against undertaking pilgrimage to Amarnath cave and Mata Vaishno Devi shrines in Jammu and Kashmir.
One of the letters, which were purported to have been written by LeT Area Commander Karim Ansari, warns Hindus against undertaking pilgrimage to the Amarnath cave and Mata Vaishno Devi shrines in Jammu and Kashmir.
SP Kamaljeet Singh Dhillon said he had been given the letters which were first received by the Mahant of local Sheetla Mata Mandir Kamal Kishor.
Another letter threatens that 8 important temples of Himachal Pradesh and several important temples of Punjab, including Hanuman Garhi Madir, Sheetla Mata Mandirs of Phagwara and Kapurthala, Shri Kali Mata Mandir of Patiala and Durgiana Mandir of Amritsar will be targeted with bombs.
The letters claim Lashkar-e-Toiba activists have entered Punjab which would be made the first target for taking revenge of bin Laden s death.
The letters warn certain prominent Hindu leaders were on the target of LeT and there will be largescale bloodshed of Hindus and Sikhs. They especially mention the names of Shiv Sena Presidents of Kapurthala, Patiala and Amritsar districts.
"If this warning is not heeded, then Hindus and Sikhs would be massacred," added the letter.

More news on extent of PFI reveals true face of secularism of Congress

What is PFI (Popular Front of India)? It is an organization based on Islam.

It is involved in the incident of attack[cutting off the hands] on a Professor in Kerala (here or here).

Former CM of Kerala, a Communist, said that it wants to turn Kerala in to a Muslim majority state (here or here). {Pamphlets of PFI read," force could prevent installation of an Islamic rule in the country if hard work was put up to secure this goal..."}

It has boasted about its efforts to make India an Islamic republic (here).

Former CM Achutanand was ridiculed for saying such thing and his observations, however, based on pamphlets confiscated by police, were taken as insult to all Muslims implying that Muslim organizations are not wrong in having such objectives but it is communalism if others report such incidents or to be more accurate others are criminals for opposing Islamic fascism.

In all this, present CM of Kerala proclaimed, when he was the opposition minister, that his party will co-operate in curtailing activities of PFI (here). Or even IUML, an ally of secular Congress, called PFI anti Islamic party (here).

Now the question is what Mr CM is going to do now - since he is in power now - to curtail its activities in the wake of more dangerous revelations about PFI? Is Mr CM going to ban PFI? Will IUML support banning PFI? I think we all know the answer.

Will Popular Front of India be banned?  
NEW DELHI: Pakistan's intelligence agency, the ISI has reportedly claimed to have helped French authorities bust a major terror network. Mohammad Niaz who was arrested in Paris last week is believed to be the Indian link to the Al Qaeda - someone agencies believe is also recruiting members for the Popular Front's French arm.
Indian national Mohammed Niaz Abdul Rashid was arrested in Paris for his alleged al Qaeda connection. Authorities in Paris have so far remained tight lipped about what charges they would slap against Niaz but Indian investigators say Niaz was trying to set up a branch of this organisation - the Popular Front of India in France.
Sources have told CNN-IBN that Niaz has been in France since 2008 and was on a recruitment drive to create the Popular Front of France.
Two people from France, four French of Moroccan origin, one of Turkish origin and one Pakistani French national were part of his core group.
Sources in the Indian security establishment say this group had access to PFI literature which was being used to convince young men to join their organization............

Thursday, June 2, 2011

Moderate Islamic Pakistan? 67% want Pakistan to be more Islamic

67% of people of Pakistan want Islamization of Pakistan. 20% have no opinion. Only 13%, mostly secular liberals and minorities, oppose Islamization. These are the results of a Gallup poll (Gallup Pakistan).

No wonder then that Hindus have disappeared from Pakistan and Christians are on the way to extermination too (read this too). 

Even then, our Prime Minister says India and Pakistan should fight the menace of Islamic terrorism and  'Taliban like elements' together. Such is the grasp of our politicians and our security establishment. More importantly our pathetic school of intellectuals (comprising journalists and historians) will never really see what this 'Islamization' means as for them Islam has right to be what it wants but Hindus and Hinduism are just elements of fascism. But I am sure that what ever this 'Islamization' means but it is not secularism in its basic concept i.e. equality of all people irrespective of religion. 

LAHORE – As many as 67 per cent people of Pakistan want the government take steps for Islamisation, a clear indication that for whatever reasons they have lost faith in the existing system.
According to a survey carried out by Gilani Research Foundation, 31 per cent people want the government take the required steps at once. However, 48 per cent think that the needed steps should be taken one by one. People approached for survey had been asked: “In your opinion should the government take steps to Islamise the society?” These findings clearly mean that the claims made by various elements that Pakistan should be a secular state are totally baseless and contrary to the wishes of the people.
This is a unique kind of survey carried out by an organization (Gallup Pakistan) in a society where more than 90 per cent people are Muslims, no matter which sect they belong to. That 31 per cent people want ‘immediate’ steps for Islamisation means that they are totally disappointed with the ability of the existing system to solve their problems and want to switch over to the Islamic system, for the sake of which the country had been created in 1947.
According to the survey, 48 per cent people are for a gradual approach. In other words, they want the government to take the required steps one by one.
Without any iota of doubt, these people also pin their hopes on the Islamic system, but want it introduced gradually, which, ostensibly, means that no hasty step should be taken which had the potential to backfire.
Thirteen per cent of those approached for their opinions said there was no need for Islamization. Such people could be secularists, liberals or of the minority communities...........

Monday, May 30, 2011

U.S. itself is laying the ground for reign of Islam in world: Iranian commander

So, yet another statement of Islamic supremacism (fascism), at least honest about Islamic goal - i.e. the whole world under Sharia law - along with admission that Islam and Islamic culture are parasites.

How should this be viewed as it is just coming after fews days after similar statements from an Iranian minster? Of course, media will continue to neglect such statements coming from Muslims but pouncing on opposition to Islamic fascism.

Any way, US may be doing technological side but it is not possible with out infidel politicians like politicians in India are so busy (and competitive) laying the ground for an Indian Islamic republic.
TEHRAN - Basij Commander Mohammad-Reza Naqdi has said that the United States is setting the stage for the future dominance of Islam over the world by its own hands.
“The United States, through expanding communications, is developing the infrastructures for the universal reign of Islam. Expansion of communications in the world has provided a historic opportunity for the faster and wider propagation of the Islamic Revolution and the thoughts of the Late Imam (Khomeini, the Founder of the Islamic Republic) throughout the world and (the opportunity) must be used appropriately,” Naqdi stated in Tehran on Sunday.
Elsewhere in his remarks, the Basij commander made a mockery of U.S. President Barack Obama’s recent call for Israel to halt its settlement activity in the West Bank and said, “Our recommendation to the Zionists is that they push ahead with their settlement activity in the occupied territories, regardless of the U.S. president’s remarks so that the Palestinians, who will return to their homeland soon, would not face housing problems.”
Naqdi also said, “Today the world’s nations have chosen the Islamic Republic as their leader, and as the first step, Muslims in the region will soon bring the borders of the Middle East back to the lines set before 1919.”
He was referring to the Paris Peace Conference of 1919, organized by the victors of World War I to negotiate the peace treaties between the Allied and Associated Powers and the defeated Central Powers, which led to the conclusion of a number of peace treaties that reshaped the map of Europe and the world.
In addition, Naqdi announced that a new branch of the Basij organization, made up of members from the engineering graduates in the field of information and communication technology, will be established in the near future. 

Sunday, May 29, 2011

A Christian in Algeria imprisoned for 5 years for sharing his faith with a Muslim

Here, I just keep asking for an example of a Muslim majority country that is secular and democratic. Sure, some ignorant people will come up with 2 or 3 names but a simple google check on these give a  contradictory situation existing on ground. It is pertinent to recall that OIC (Organization of Islamic Countries) - a representative body of 57 Muslim majority nations - declared in the year 1991 that their source of laws will be Sharia law and Sharia law will be the ultimate arbitrator in resolving issues. Sharia law effectively bans propagation of any other faith, construction or reparation  of churches or temples and celebration of non-Islamic festivals in public etc.

In line with this kind of philosophy, Algeria shuts down 7 churches and imprisons a Christian because he was sharing his faith with a Muslim (here).
Washington -- International Christian Concern (ICC) has learned that an Algerian Christian was sentenced to five years imprisonment for blasphemy in Oran on Wednesday after sharing his Christian faith with a neighbor. The verdict came days after authorities forced the permanent closure of seven Protestant churches in Algeria's BĂ©jaia province.
Siagh Krimo was charged by the Criminal Court of the Djamel District in Oran, who based their decision on Article 144 bis 2 of the Penal Code which criminalizes acts that "insult the prophet and any of the messengers of God, or denigrate the creed and precepts of Islam, whether by writing, drawing, declaration, or any other means." Krimo has ten days to appeal the sentence.
Krimo, who is married with a nine month old child, was arrested on April 14, along with another Christian, Sofiane, after sharing his Christian faith with a neighbor. Sofiane was released soon after the arrest, while Krimo was detained for three days. Krimo was known to hold weekly prayer services at his home, which Algerian Christians suspect were being closely monitored by the police........
One can read the full report from above given link.

These same Islamic nations spend Billions of Dollars for propagation of Islamic faith in infidel majority countries like USA, Europe and India etc.. They sponsor construction of mega mosques and Islamic centers - supposedly cultural but the real purpose is conversion - in all most all non-Muslim majority nations.

If ever one questions this one way traffic, so called Muslim reformers and their non-Muslim apologetics come up with bizarre arguments in Islam's defense ranging from 'Islam followed by all present day Islamic countries is not real Islam' to 'this is because of arrogance of petro dollars'.

After 1400 years, Muslim majority states do not know about their true Islam!!!

'Islamophobia' in 'INDIA TODAY'

Considering that saying anything that sheds light on intolerant nature of Islam, Muslim societies and inherent Islamic hatred towards non-Muslims is labelled as Islamophobia, this article on condition of Hindus in Pakistan under the title 'Soft Target in Pakistan:Abduction, oppression and forced conversion is fate of Hindus in Pak' is bit unusual for an entity like India Today.

Complete reading, but, conveys that the report is well with in the secular parameters of India Today because apart from mentioning certain atrocities and institutionalized discrimination against Hindus, it does not offer any significant  insight or reasons behind those atrocities. In addition, it presents some half truths and dangerous reasonings. Central theme of presentation of a catalog of crimes against religious minorities in Islamic nations is the axiom  that Islam and its tenets have nothing to do with such crimes as Islam teaches tolerance!

Sure, report mentions some crimes like abduction of girls and use of blasphemy law by Muslims against their Hindu competitors but it almost tries to portray that reasons for this crimes are 'so called' atrocities against Muslims in India and Indian occupation of Kashmir.

So, Muslims of Pakistan and its Govt. have no control over their actions or deeds or their policies thus, they can not be held accountable and are blameless. In short words, Hindus in India and India are responsible for events happening in Pakistan and it is duty and responsibility of India to ensure civilized behavior from Pakistan.

One can ask, "Will India Today report the crimes committed by Muslims of India in West Bengal, Kerala and Assam? Did it report on Islamic Jihad - that took place in October 2010 - in Deganga?" It can not and will not.

Lets ask India Today if it reports and publishes how those Hindus - who migrated to India - are treated by so called secular outfits like Congress and Communists in India. It will simply not.

Lot of Indian media esp. English is distrusted and loathed by educated and English speaking Indian middle class which is also their main customer base; so, this base can not be neglected and publishing of such thrash report is their version of proof for showing they are not anti-Hindu.

One can read the published report from here.

Saturday, May 28, 2011

Islam is a religion of peace?

So sad that so many Muslims including Muslim women do not understand this! So, we have this kind of protests by Muslims in London during the visit of US President to UK.

Pictures courtesy: mail on line (here)

In Oslo, Muslim men account for majority of rape crimes

"A Pakistani Muslim man in Oslo, convicted of rape crime, said that he had the right to do exactly as he wanted to a woman. Why? Because that is how it was in his religion. Women did not have rights or opinions. He was in charge." (watch the video below)

We have seen how Muslim men account for more than 82% of rapes in Sweden (here). We have seen how Muslim men in UK were engaged in sexual Jihad (here).

For all this epidemic of rape, we have seen Muslim imams declaring that it is not the fault of Muslim men for rape but it is the fault of infidel women not wearing veil (here).

This war upon infidel women by Muslim men unlikely to cease because of political correctness creeping in to every institution in all non-Muslim majority nations, which simply forbids identifying criminals as they are. In UK, all these criminals involved in rape assaults were mentioned as of Asian origin while other European nations use the word 'of non-Western origin'.

EVERY SINGLE RAPE and sexual assault in the last year in Oslo, Norway was committed by Muslims

Friday, May 27, 2011

Iranian intelligence minister says, "The future of world, including US and West, is Islam"

Honorable Iranian minister didn't leave out India, an example of secularism, from Islam's ultimate achievement. And, this is what vast majority of Muslims, in India or outside, do believe in i.e. the whole world being ruled under sharia law for the simple reason being that Allah says so in Koran in number of Koranic verses (9:33, 61:09, 48:28) and also the knowledge of many Muslims actively involved in Jihad [violent or stealth(peaceful) jihad like love jihad, immigration and high birth rates].

Minister is also under no delusion - like many non-Muslims deliberately believing in Arab spring of revolts resulting in secularism and democracy - about the true nature of all those protests in Islamic countries.

But, it is nothing wrong for any Muslim to say such things but it is a hate crime against Muslims and an act of Islamophobia to report and discuss such things. (original report)

“The recent events … show that the future of the world, including [that of] the US and Europe, belongs to Islam,” Moslehi said at a conference in the central Iranian city of Karaj on Thursday.

The intelligence minister pointed to the recent popular revolutions in Egypt, Tunisia and Yemen and other anti-government uprisings across the Arab world and argued that all of these movements are of Islamic nature, inspired by the Islamic Revolution in Iran.

Moslehi referred to the West's “confusion” over the wave of the Islamic awakening, saying Western countries try to attribute the movements to “non-Islamic” roots.

The recent visits by US President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to different parts of the world, particularly to the Middle Eastern countries, are aimed at “preventing further losses to the US interests in the region,” he added.

Moslehi called on regional heads of states, especially Saudi officials, not to follow the US path, because they themselves will eventually “get entangled with the Islamic awakening.”

In recent months, a wave of revolutions and anti-government uprisings has swept the Arab world.

In January, a revolution in Tunisia ended the 23-year ruling of former President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali.

In February, another revolution led to the ouster of former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak after three decades of authoritarian rule.

Other revolutions have erupted in Libya, Yemen and Bahrain, while more anti-government upheavals have swept Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Oman and Algeria.

Meanwhile, more Arab countries are expected to witness similar revolts.

Thursday, May 26, 2011

Surge in abduction of Christian girls in Egypt

Abul Fazl, in Akbar Nama, says that many Muslim officers used to proceed to the villages and mahals to sack Hindus. In these sackings, normally the women and children were driven away. In Akbar’s reign it became a fashion to raid a village or a group of villages without any obvious justification, and carry off the inhabitants as slaves.’ (India at the Death of Akbar, Low Price Publications, New Delhi, page 92)

It is no wonder then that Abdulla Khan Uzbeg, a general of Akbar, had boastfully declared: ‘I made prisoners of five lacs (500,000) of men and women and sold them. They all became Muhammadans. From their progeny, there will be crores (one crore = ten million) by the Day of Judgment.’ (K.S.Lal (1994), p. 73)

It is a core policy and a principle of Islam from the time of Islam's Prophet to the present day to make infidel women as sex slaves and from their progeny future Muslim warriors [This is how Ottoman Caliphate came in to existence]. In many Muslim countries, like Pakistan, Bangladesh and Egypt and in India too, abduction of non-Muslim women goes un checked. This practice quite very well serves Islam as it humiliates non-Muslims - just like Koran commanded them to - and it eliminates females of childbearing years from the gene pool of non-Muslims - along with a dent in population of non-Muslims - and forces them to produce Muslim offspring (children) instead.

Coming to Egypt, it was never a secular country and this kind of abduction of Coptic girls always took place; with the end of Mubarak's regime and possibility of Islamists coming to power, this kind of activities i.e. violence against Coptics will only increase.

No Going Back for Egypt's Converted Copts

Amid the upheavals in Egypt since January, reports have begun to emerge of a surge in disappearances of Coptic girls.

One priest in Cairo estimates that at least 21 young girls, many as young as 14, have disappeared from his parish alone.

In most cases, when a Christian girl who disappears is found by her family, she has been converted to Islam and married. The Coptic authorities, have even set up a series of refuges in monasteries to handle the growing numbers of girls who wish to return to their families, many of whom are not accepted by their family of origin.

But a worse problem for these women is that their conversion to Islam is irreversible.

Religion is stated on Egyptian ID documents and even though secular law provides for reversions, under the growth of sharia they are very difficult, except for those affording legal advocacy.

This situation is not unique to Egypt. There have been consistent reports of girls being coerced into Islamic conversion and marriage in India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka.

That many of these girls are initially runaways is not in doubt. However, there is also evidence that a huge number are converted and married against their will.

The situation was documented in a controversial report published in 2009 on conversion and forced marriage of Coptic women by Washington DC-based Christian Solidarity International. The authors are Washington academic Michele Clark and Egyptian Coptic broadcast journalist Nadia Ghaly, based in Melbourne.

Between 2005 and 2008 they interviewed and documented 50 Egyptian women, mostly aged between 14 and 25, who had decided to return to their families. All claim to have been tricked, coerced or raped, converted to Islam and married. Most of the interviewees were trying to reconvert to their Christian identity, with limited or no success. The report's conclusions were printed in several major publications, including Forbes magazine.

Since the so-called Arab Spring, and the ensuing riots at Christian churches, the authors are trying to bring the subject of forced conversion and marriage to greater prominence.

Both groups live extremely closed, highly traditional separate lives and the norms surrounding marriage and sex are almost medieval, says Ghaly.

So, for example, it is not unheard of for a young Christian girl from a poor family to run away from an arranged marriage. Yet a high proportion of these women claim coercion, even rape, despite the shame that such a claim will cause if the girl wishes to return.

Many claim they were kept as virtual slaves. Others who were able to leave could not bring their children. Ghaly claims this is more than overt religious oppression, and amounts to "a form of cultural genocide".

She cites a document published by Human Rights Watch in November 2007, which says that even if Coptic women can obtain a divorce from their Muslim husband, those who wish to return to Christianity "meet with refusal and harassment from the Civil Status Department of the Ministry of Interior".

Under sharia law, reconversion is considered apostasy punishable by death.

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

'Waking up to the reality of the Religion of Peace'

"I started this journey after 9/11, but not immediately after. As shocked as I was that nearly 3,000 lives were brutally snuffed out by Islamic terrorists, I bought the line that George Bush and Tony Blair parroted; namely, that Islam is a “religion of peace” that had been “hijacked” by extremists. So, I dismissed Osama bin Laden as nothing more than a homicidal extremist, and I really didn’t examine it any deeper. But then I happened to see a billboard on Sunset Blvd. around May 2005. The billboard had some words on it I had never seen before, including “dhimmitude”, “Eurabia” and “Bat Y’eor”, and the address of a website,"

Above are the words of 'some one' put up by Bill Myers at which can be read from here .How much good it will do to humanity if all non-Muslims do the same thing i.e. learning about Islam from Islamic sources. 

Islamic leaders of Malaysia question rights of non-Muslims

About 60% of population in Malaysia is Muslim and its constitution declares Islam as official religion. It also prohibits propagation of other religions to Muslims; Muslims converting to another is religion is effectively banned while non-Muslims can convert to Islam.

Besides these, other privileges or special rights also were given to Muslims over non-Muslims (here) constitutionally.

The Institute of Islamic Understanding Malaysia (IKIM) clarifies that, firstly, Islam rejects religious pluralism which claims that all religions are equally true and equally good (here).

Recently, Malaysian govt. confiscated Bibles printed in Malay because they were using the word Allah (which is in usage by Malaysian Christians for centuries), which ultimately lead to protests from Christians, who constitute about10% of population.

With this back ground, some Muslim politicians in Malaysia warned Christians not to make unreasonable demands: Don’t test patience of Malays, Perkasa warns Christians .  (10th April, 2011)

Another report: Perkasa ready to crusade against ungrateful Christians (15th May, 2011)

Ultimately we have this:  Islamic leaders question non-Muslim rights ( 23rd May, 2011)
...................... Malaysian Islamic Youth Movement (Abim) deputy president, Dr Mohd Rumaizuddin Ghazali, also stressed that Malaysia must never become a secular state.
“This is why many non-Muslim politicians want to declare the country as a secular state because then the government will not have fund religious programmes.
“They are scared that if we accept Malaysia as an Islamic state then there are many implications which means that only Muslims have the right to lead the country,” he said.
Mohd Rumaizuddin added that the Malays are beginning to be trampled on and non-Muslims are starting to take advantage of the community.
“Because of politics, we are still not free after more than 50 years of independence,” he said.
Hizbut Tahrir Malaysia president Abdul Hakim Othman added the country’s constitution must be replaced as it has been stained by the colonial British.
“A Caliphate state is based on divine revelation. It is not a democratic or a theocratic state. It is only an Islamic state when the constitution is based on the Quran and prophetic traditions,” he said.

Even in the face of institutionalized discrimination towards non-Muslims, only Muslims can boast about tolerance. Or, they intend to make dhimmi covenant fully applied.

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Islamic Paradise, Houris and Sex

People might be wondering why Muslims alone carry out so many suicide bombings (or missions) so often  killing themselves and also others, considered as infidels in their language. One might contemplate  the motivations behind such acts! Sure, there are many reasons behind such acts and one such is attaining entry in to Paradise.

Also, it is not uncommon to come across some prominent Muslims declaring proudly that life in this world is not important but life in ‘hereafter’ [Life after death] is more important in Islamic view e.g. the view of the so called moderate Muslim: Imam Rauf, the brain behind $100 million mega imperial mosque in New York near ground zero.

Or who might proudly declare like this: Americans love Pepsi Cola; we (Muslims) love Death.

Or who might try to blow themselves, including young boys, up to kill others to enter paradise.

Or consider the following verse:
009.038(YUSUFALI): O you who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when you are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, you cling heavily to the earth? Do you prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter.
Death, ‘hereafter’ and Paradise! For now, with out getting in to details of ‘hereafter’ lets look at the concept of Paradise as described in Koran and traditions of Prophet Mohammad (hadith). For people with critical minds, this concept of paradise in Islam explains a lot about primitiveness, shrewdness and, more importantly, psychological portrait of Prophet Mohammad.

Sunday, May 22, 2011

An Exemplary Imam from Florida

In addition to providing money to Taliban, when fighters in Afghanistan had killed seven American soldiers, Imam Khan “declared his wish that 'Allah' bring death to 50,000 Americans more.”

Many times in this blog, I mentioned and have written about Taqiyya or doctrine of Taqiyya. It is simply about Allah telling Muslims that they can lie to non-Muslims to advance Islamic cause i.e. for realizing ultimate Islamic goal of the whole world governed under Sharia law. For literal meaning, one can read from Tafsir of Ibn Kathir. Classical Islamic scholar Ibn Kathir writes that believers, who fear for their safety from disbelievers, are allowed to show friendship to the disbelievers outwardly, but never inwardly [or for the purpose of advancing Islam]. For instance, Al-Bukhari recorded that Abu Ad-Darda' said, "We smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.''  How about smiling and waging Jihad behind?

If Jihad means striving to impose sharia law on the world by any means, Taqiyya [Doctrine of Taqiyya] simply extends the scope of means of Jihad.

We see this practice of Taqiyya in present day world when Muslim representatives and spokesmen in non-Muslim majority nations consistently keep misguiding non-Muslims on notions of Islamic peace, Jihad, institutions of dhimma and Sharia and with statements like Islam respects all religions and guarantees freedom of religion.

Recently in Florida, three people (one Imam and his two sons) of Pakistani origin - two of them being Imams - were arrested on charges of supporting terrorism through raising funds for Taliban (here).

It is the dual life of father - 76 year old with the name Hafiz Muhammed Sher Ali Khan (also a imam) - that merits attention of non-Muslims.

In one life, he was calm and gives peaceful sermons in the mosque and stresses that Islam is non-violent and peaceful; Miami Herald writes (here or here):
Unlike other U.S. Muslims who have been accused of supporting terrorism or engaging in terrorist acts, Imam Khan is a well-known and respected figure in Miami. He did not keep to the shadows, as have other terrorist suspects, and his public life yielded no clue that he might be involved in radical activity. Instead, he led prayers at a mosque five times a day and counseled the faithful. Instead of delivering jihadist sermons, the 76-year-old religious leader preached the traditional, mainstream version of Islam that rejects violence and stresses peace and the sanctity of life. By all accounts, he is habitually soft-spoken and avoids harsh language.
How can Miami herald come to the opinion that what he was preaching in mosque is mainstream Islam? Call it ignorance and constrains of political correctness. 

His other life includes raising money to fund activities of Taliban - $50,000 in transactions - to buy guns, to support militants families and supporting cause of Taliban. Besides this, charges also include that imam opened a madrassa in swat valley that shelters members of Pakistan's Taliban and tranis children to become militants or suicide bombers, like this report suggests.

Attorney of Department of Justice quotes (here):
Despite being an Imam, or spiritual leader, Hafiz Khan was by no means a man of peace.   Instead, as today’s charges show, he acted with others to support terrorists to further acts of murder, kidnapping and maiming.   But for law enforcement intervention, these defendants would have continued to transfer funds to Pakistan to finance the Pakistani Taliban, including its purchase of guns........the defendants sought to aid the Pakistani Taliban’s fight against the Pakistani government and its perceived allies, including the United States, by supporting acts of murder, kidnapping and maiming in Pakistan and elsewhere, in order to displace the lawful government of Pakistan and to establish strict Islamic law known as Sharia.” 
And also:
.......On another occasion in September 2010, Hafiz Khan participated in a conversation in which he stated that he would provide that individual with contact information for Pakistani Taliban militants in Karachi, and upon hearing that mujahideen in Afghanistan had killed seven American soldiers, declared his wish that 'Allah' kill 50,000 more.
When ever a terrorist act takes place or is averted, immediate response from many Islamic organizations and main stream media is about 'fearing backlash against Muslim community'. A nice way to scuttle any discussion on Islam in this politically correct world!

Friday, May 20, 2011

Jihad means defensive war? An Islamic website does not think so

Some months back even officials from Obama administration stated Jihad is a legitimate concept in Islam with out giving any definition of 'Jihad'; probably they were thinking it means spiritual struggle or defensive warfare but never a war against non-Muslims and to impose Islamic law on the world. But those who have read Islamic concept of Jihad and lived Islam knew what it means.

Dokku Abu Usman is often referred to as Osama Bin Laden of Russia and is  self-declared emir (president) of Russian North Caucasus. He says, in an interview to an Islamic website:
The path has been chosen, we know our tasks, and we will not turn back, Insha'Allah, from this path. Today, the battlefield is not just Chechnya and the Caucasus Emirate, but also the whole Russia. The situation is visible to everybody who has eyes. The Jihad is spreading, steadily and inevitably, everywhere......
For the first time in decades, the awakening of the Islamic Ummah from hibernation has become so clear and widespread. The Mujahideen and true scholars operate more than ever simultaneously in different regions of the globe, supporting each other and realizing the common goal. Ordinary Muslims take to the streets and express their support for the Mujahideen, demanding to restore the Sharia......
The only thing I can say for certain is that if there are no armed force of Muslims, no Jihad and no fighting, nobody would allow us to establish the Sharia of Allah. If it were possible, it would have been done already by our Prophet (pbuh).
One can read the full interview from here.

Thursday, May 19, 2011

Useful 'idiot' Swami Agnivesh

There are many people who regard Swami(?) Agnivesh as a fraudster. Here, in this report, he becomes a useful idiot for Islamic supremacists. It looks like he spoke to media persons on the sidelines of peace conference (!) on J & K and on various aspects like Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA), reasons for insurgency and pilgrimage to Amarnath.

Another dimension is how various media outlets reported this; many reported his enlightened opinions on all issues except on Amarnath pilgrimage (here, here, here, here); I found that only outlook reported the swami's 'sermon' in totality. Selective reporting is not new to media. (one can read the report here)

Advocating immediate revocation of the Armed Forces Special Powers Act, social activist Swami Agnivesh today demanded an inquiry by a Supreme Court judge into the killing of civilians during last year's summer unrest in Kashmir Valley.
"Firstly, there is need to withdraw AFSPA from Jammu and Kashmir immediately," he told reporters on the sidelines of a "Peace Conference", organized by the J&K Peace Foundation, here.
"There is also need for a probe by a sitting Supreme Court judge into the killing of civilians during violence in the Valley last summer," Agnivesh said.
His portrayal of Army or security personnel, implication is clear, speaks of his ignorance about political and bureaucratic dealings who create mess in the first place then ask Army to sort out the matter; so, it is these two classes that should be prosecuted and first to be done should be clans of first dynasty.

Seeing people dead is bad and unfortunate; but 112 people over a month and with people throwing stones at security personnel, we can only say that protests were handled badly and with out any intentionality; all this is because of poor equipment (gear) given to security personnel by their New Delhi bosses. 
The social activist demanded release of all the youths detained without trial in the past one year in the Valley. "Instead those who have committed the crime should be thrown into jails," he said.
All our politicians should be locked up. Way back I suggested that  instead of Army doing such jobs all the time, politicians also should be asked to do fighting against terrorists, separatists once in a while; this will make them do their job honestly and in better way or else they will equip Army with better gear.
On the Kashmir problem, Agnivesh quipped "it is a political and not a religious issue".
That is why separatists call it Jihad. They blow up churches. Hindus and Sikhs were expelled or forced to leave. If any one found reading Bible will be shot dead. Schools with Christian names, even if owned by Muslims, will be burned. No one should try to proselytize in Valley. If any one speaking against Islam, they will be killed too. Muslim extremists can demand Jizya from non-Muslims. All these things have nothing to do with Islam.
On the annual pilgrimage to the revered cave shrine of Amarnath, Agnivesh said, "I do not understand those who go for the Yatra. It is a religious deception." "I do not believe in this type of religion. Religion is when you seek justice for the poor, for the oppressed," he said.
By this, he endorsed Jizya Govt. of J and K levied on Hindu pilgrims and is like all those dhimmi politicians in New Delhi who never protested against this Jizya.

One question is, what kind of views he has on Muslims making hajj pilgrimage with central got. doling out Rs 1000 crores? Is it enlightenment or deception?

If he could have said this kind on hajj, he would be seeking some special protection cover because by this time many fatwas might have been issued on his head.

So, it is OK and safe to insult or question Hindu faith or rituals, more so when it brings rich rewards and dividends from media and liberals and from present Govt..

But, why did media report his remarks? Is he some kind of person with huge influence? Or because of some enlightenment in his observations?

For now, Muslims have to wait in Australia

Australian Prime Minister announced a new policy of multiculturalism and Muslims immediately made a move to push sharia law in the name of pluralism. Just think of a system that does not treat members of others religions in any humane manner when Muslims are in majority, but makes its adherents demand some special Islamic privileges from non-Muslims governments when Muslims are in minority! How should one imagine such system?

With out writing a great deal on this episode, I rather give hyperlinks and quote paragraphs from those links.

Report 1:

Muslims to push for sharia    

THE nation's peak Muslim group is using the Gillard government's re-embracing of multiculturalism to push for the introduction of sharia in Australia, but it says it would be a more moderate variety of Islamic law that fits with Australian values.

The Australian Federation of Islamic Councils, in a submission to a parliamentary inquiry into the government's new multiculturalism policy, argues that Muslims should enjoy "legal pluralism".

In an interview with The Australian, the organisation's president, Ikebal Adam Patel, who wrote the submission, nominated family law and specifically divorce as an area where moderate interpretations of sharia could co-exist within the Australian legal system..........

Jihadwatch website bluntly and very appropriately says (here): "Even if they(Muslims) presented a binding constitution of "moderate" Australian Sharia, it would be immaterial. Where it was in agreement with Australian laws, it would be redundant. Where it disagreed, it would be illegal."

So, 'hyped' moderate Sharia is irrelevant and not needed. Yet, what makes these Muslim leaders to push for its inclusion in Constitution?

Report 2:

Australian govt. rejects any inclusion of sharia in its constitution (at least for now)

Report 3: (Most of the time, we find that those supporting leftist political ideology, in the name of pluralism and multiculturalism support this kind of special laws; but here, we see two academics coming together, one is leftist and another is a Victorian, to oppose implementing sharia law in any form in Australia.)

Goodbye to rights under sharia

THE latest push to introduce sharia law in Australia has triggered an unlikely alliance by two professors of law with only one thing in common: they know a threat when they see one.

Civil libertarian Spencer Zifcak and constitutional monarchist David Flint are from opposing sides of the political spectrum. But they are united by a deceptively reasonable push for a form of sharia law in Australia.........

The latest proposal, by the Federation of Islamic Councils Inc, seeks to reverse that arrangement in at least one critical area: family law. If implemented, a form of "legal pluralism", or legal apartheid, would take root on Australian soil. Public policy debates on family law and other areas covered by sharia would be irrelevant to the entire Muslim community.

Many of the rights bestowed on Muslim women by Australian law would disappear. Decisions on property settlements and the custody of children after the breakdown of a marriage would depend on the religious councils of Islam.........  

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

'Is Islamic India only future?'

The name of this post is title of a post that appeared in which must have been written by some non-Indian. What ever it be, does the name of the post look like giving apocalyptical scenario to Indian (Hindu) civilization?

Some people, mostly Hindus, instinctively dismiss this and label the author as an Islamophobic or as a loony with out even reading or attempting to understand and question various finer points raised by author; and as always they love to continue to indulge in wishful thinking in concepts of all religions are same, multiculturalism, peaceful co-existence, which itself results from romantic idea of Islamic history in India they are fed with.

But these people are ignorants - if not fools - who have no clue about teachings of Islam and functioning and dynamics of Islamic culture or society.

Coming to that post, I myself do not agree with some of his views i.e. bringing USA in to the picture; otherwise it is thought provoking, more accurately, it is a genuine warning to all Hindus if they do not want to be swept under carpet like Hindus in Pakistan were exterminated, and like extermination of Hindus in Bangladesh under progress (25% of population is down to less than 8% and continue to fall).

These figures or other facts of struggles of other religious minorities in other Islamic countries do not matter to these humanists, liberals or seculars and never appear in their views, yet they indulge in defending Islam in the name of humanity.

These figures also do not matter in the views of many people who rather like to say, 'Islam is fine because I know so and so Muslim or a Muslim guy who is good guy.' or 'I know a Pakistani who is just like us.' To be more insane, giving a reason like Shahrukh Khan said , "Islam prohibits killing of innocent people." But, who is innocent, dear?

Frightening, isn't it? Neither Islamic teachings nor genocides nor exterminations nor suffering of religious minorities in Islamic nations nor excessive demands of Muslim minorities living in infidel majority countries do never matter but one person or one guy makes my view.

Now, is Islamic India a possibility? I can say that it is not impossible considering what happened in Assam or what is happening in West Bengal.

Previously, there is one Muslim majority district, Murshidabad. In 2001, Maldah too became one; analysis says there must be two more Muslim majority districts like Uttar Dinajpur and Birbhum  [include the possibility of  24 parganas (south) too] according to 2011 census and many more districts bordering Bangladesh about to become Muslim majority in the near future. [Note: look at the pictures at the bottom of the post.]

With regard to Assam, its fate was sealed and evidence for this is results of recent assembly elections. Ugly face of Islam has brought out its tail of the hat and it is only a matter of time before it presents itself in full force.

Below is the post (link to that post here):

Jihad has come to India and, yet, the Obama administration along with State Department will tell you that it is nothing more than “isolated acts by individuals”. The government New Delhi is willing to go on record to suggest that will say you are “stirring up anti-Muslim sentiment.” The mainstream media will question as to how you can say that when we are hearing nothing about it from them. But it is real, and it is happening now. How do I know?! Well, that’s because I have seen it all through my very own eyes. The Obama administration’s studied denial will find us caught as flat-footed in India as we were in Lebanon, Egypt, Libya, and elsewhere. The only difference being: India is an economic and military giant, with nuclear weapons, and could be a cornerstone of any effective fight against radical Islam.

For several years now I have been fiercely vocal about the progressive radicalization of Bangladesh along with its nationals. Although it is the only country that ranks among the ten most populous and the ten most densely populated, as well as being the second largest Muslim-majority nation, events there do not capture people’s imagination. When you talk about India in the same context, however, people take notice. The thought of an Islamist dominated India scares the heck out of them and should. While our own strategic thinkers concentrate on internecine struggles in the Middle East, their obliviousness to the significance of an [Islamist India] has enabled our enemies to further their agenda.

I have spent many years journey along India’s 2545 mile-long border with Bangladesh, besides witnessing the impact Bangladesh’s radicalization has had on its giant neighbor to the west. Amitabh Tripathi, who has been fighting against what he calls his country’s “soft policies,” noted that Bangladesh’s Muslims “are not radicalized but their institutions are.” That radicalization and a level of corruption on both sides of the border that makes my fellow Chicagoans look like amateurs has already produced demographic change in many strategic areas of India. [With such ignorant people at the lead fighting for their existence, it may not be successful.]

It also has given Muslim activists carte blanche throughout the entire country. The process is deliberate, has been going on for decades, and should send us a terrible warning signal, not only because of what it bodes for India, but also because of what sort of future the Obama administration’s soft policies and tolerance for an open border to our south mean for the United States.

Each year in districts like Uttar Dinajpur and North and South 24 Parganas directly across from the Islamic state, my colleagues and I find that more and more villages which once had mixed Hindu-Muslim populations are now all Muslim or Muslim-dominated. Gone are the roadside temples characteristic of places where Hindus practice their faith openly; gone are the sights of Hindu women dressed in their colorful saris and other vestments. They have been replaced by mosques and burqas.

Each state, my colleagues and I find that more and more villages which once had mixed Hindu-Muslim populations are now all Muslim or Muslim-dominated. Gone are the roadside temples characteristic of places where Hindus practice their faith openly; gone are the sights of Hindu women dressed in their colorful saris and other vestments. They have been replaced by mosques and burqas. Last year, Tripathi and I met with Bimal Praminik, Director of the Kolkata-based Centre for Research in Indo-Bangladesh Relations and arguably the foremost authority on these population changes. He is convinced that this population shift is a deliberate and an integral element the jihad that threatens all of us: “Bangladeshi infiltration with Pakistani ideas… trying to ‘Pakistanize’ the entire region,” he said adding that that the dominant culture for South Asian Muslims has become more “Arabic,” than South Asian. [Such is the understanding of these fellows: I feel like shouting, "it is Islam, idiots."]

In 1947 when the British left, they partitioned the Indian subcontinent into Hindu and Muslim states. West Bengal went to “Hindu” India, and East Bengal (now Bangladesh) became part of Muslim Pakistan. While Hindu and Muslim majorities respectively, remains, exhaustive studies by Pramanik and others hold out little hope that things will continue that way..............

There is more and one can read from here .

For further reading: New Trinamool Congress Government in West Bengal May Encourage Muslim Violence