Hindu Muslim inter-religious marriages ( 10 )

Hypocrisy and double standards are order of reporting by present day media and political discourses. What accentuates this total surrender to Islamic supremacism is indifference of masses esp. Hindus who continue to be awed by khans of Muslim-mafia controlled Bollywood - a creation of English media to show their secular credentials to other nations (so much obsession with what others think about this country !).

A media which can creep to such low levels will never feel the requirement to report Islamic Jihad in India or violence of Indian Muslims to coerce Hindus to abide by norms of Sharia, here, i.e. Hindu boys do not marry Muslim girls.

Sharia law (Islamic law) allows Muslim men to marry Non-Muslim women and raise their children as Muslims while at the same time prohibiting Muslim women from marrying Non-Muslim men. Islamic law stipulates that Non-Muslim men who marry Muslim women be killed.

So, when Muslims in these two cases, mentioned below, tried to kill Hindu boys they were only following mainline teachings of Islam.

Media, so called social activists and politicians become passive supporters of such violence by default by choosing not to report nor condemn them publicly. It is worth remembering how media acted and politicians behaved and social activists marched with candles in the case of Rizwanur and Priyanka. Hypocrisy is a lesser word to describe Indian secularism.

Hate Jihad - Vice Captain of Kerala Junior football team - Jithu Mohan- bathed in petrol and set fire on for falling in love with a Muslim girl

Family of a Hindu boy who married a Muslim girl threatened with violence: Will Mamta do something?

Are these two the first of its kind reported here but not by SECULAR ENGLISH MEDIA? No. Just click on the label to read more on this.

Hindu Muslim inter-religious marriages (9): A Hindu guy killed for marrying a Muslim girl

I moved the whole post here .

Anyone wanting to comment shall do so there. 

Hindu Muslim inter religious marriages (8): A Hindu Doctor ends her life

Hindu doctor ends her life as her Muslim husband was harassing her to convert to Islam 

A tragic end to a life.

Imagine how much she could have contributed to the society and Hindu civilization if she has not taken this unfortunate route.

Coming to that Muslim monster, he will go free, considering how weak our system of law is, and marry a Muslim girl and will father and raise 3 to 4 children.

I wrote so many times here that nothing prevents Muslim men from reneging on their promises. Their own teachings tell them that they can break their promises and there is no sin in doing so as following sayings of Prophet Mohammad show:

Volume 9, Book 89, Number 260:

The Prophet said, "......... If you ever take an oath to do something and later on you find that something else is better, then you should expiate your oath and do what is better."

Volume 8, Book 78, Number 618:

Narrated 'Aisha:

Abu Bakr As-Siddiq had never broken his oaths till Allah revealed the expiation for the oaths. Then he said, "If I take an oath to do something and later on I find something else better than the first one, then I do what is better and make expiation for my oath."

And then what can be more loftier in a Muslims life than converting infidels to Islam? It is a free ticket to enjoy 72 virgin houris in paradise. It is Jihad in another form.

Here, I will go one step and analyze what prompted her to take that unfortunate decision. 

Definitely, she must have been advised by her friends or her well wishers not to go with such marriage. She must have been told by some people about true nature of Islam and how badly things could turn against her.

As with most cases, she brushed aside those advises thinking like every other Non-Muslim woman that her man is different and Islam is like every other religion. And then always, there is influence of Bollywood which itself is corrupt and immoral.

As the report says, she even applied for divorce, all this implying that she is suffering from some kind of guilt complex from which she was unable to come out. She must be blaming herself, unwarranted, for the decision she took irrespective of advises she got from many people. She was unable to talk to herself out of this and might have decided to take the unfortunate decision. 

She is not the first one of this kind. Case studies in Bhopal showed that some Hindu girls committed suicide and some suffered irreparable damages to their psychology and were living with their parents now in helpless situation. 

And finally, with regrets, I can only say that this is not the first case and will not be the last one too.

Because Islam is pure evil. And those who believe in it are nothing but monsters who lost all the feelings for humanity and rationalism.

Hindu Muslim inter religious marriages ( 7 ) : A psychologist on why Muslim men tend to oppress wives

Nicolai Sennels (born 1976) is a Danish psychologist. His first appearances in the Danish media concerned his unorthodox therapy methods that he developed as the only psychologist at Sønderbro, the youth prison. He taught the young prisoners about mindfulness meditation and developed a special program on anger management. Sennels also developed a psychotherapeutic method that focused on teaching criminals with a low understanding of emotions and empathy how to take responsibility for their own behavior. In 2008, the prisoners of Sønderbro voted the facility as the best prison in Denmark. The leader of Social Services in the Copenhagen municipality concluded that this was due to the work of Nicolai Sennels.

He also worked with Muslim criminals and based on this experience, he authored a book 'Among Criminal Muslims. A Psychologist's Experiences from the Copenhagen Municipality'.

Here, in the interview done by Robert Spencer (jihadwatch.org), he says Muslim men oppressing women is direct consequence of teachings of Islam.

Suggested to read the whole interview.

{{{

Spencer: As a psychologist, what is your explanation as to why Muslims oppress women?

Sennels: I see two psychological explanations for the oppression of women in Islam.

John Adams, the USA's 2nd president, said that he studied warfare so that his children could study agriculture and their children could study art. Abraham Maslow formulated a similar idea, the "hierarchy of needs," which shows how we aim toward a state of full development, possessing complete inner and outer freedoms, spontaneous playful creativity and love for all.

While Adams's and Maslow's views describe the goals and aims of our Western society beautifully as the full development of an individual’s potential, they do not apply to Islam or Muslim tradition. The aim of Islam and Muslims is dominance, not self-realization. Islam and Muslim culture is an aggressive movement, and giving space to female qualities such as sensitivity and empathy would be a hindrance, since it would allow for less aggressive human tendencies to emerge. Diplomacy, compromise, tolerance, democracy, compassion, sensitivity and empathy have to be locked away both on an internal and external level. On the outside, the oppression of women limits their influence, and their aversion against femininity in the outer world helps Muslims to also repress it inside themselves on the psychological level. Oppression of women is thus a psychological method of hardening a culture on the outside and people on the inside.

The other reason why Muslims oppress women and female sexuality, is the fact that women are simply stronger when it comes to sex. And it does not work for omnipotent, jealous and insecure Muslim macho-men that they in the most naked and vulnerable situation of all are the weaker party. Muslim men compensate this by oppressing their women and locking them up in apartments and ugly clumsy garments. The more embarrassing it is for the man that the woman is stronger in this essential aspect of life, the more he must dominate her in daily life. I had contact with two prostitutes who both said that Arab men did not last very long in bed. In many Muslim societies, a women's ability to enjoy sex is simply destroyed by a knife or a piece of glass. The jealous fantasy of the man not being able to satisfy his lustful wife, who therefore looks down on him and may even go to other men to gain satisfaction, is an ongoing source of torment for the wanna-be almighty Muslim man.

True love can only exist on the basis of respect and equality. Muslim societies are therefore full of men and women who never experienced true, satisfying and giving love. The emotional and sexual frustration that results from the inequality of the sexes and being forced to marry a partner that one does not love surely contribute to the aggression and emotional immaturity that Muslims display whenever they are numerous enough to feel that such behavior is acceptable. As one said, "forced marriage is the earthquake and what follows is a tsunami of domestic abuse, sexual abuse, child protection issues, suicide and murder."

}}}

Hindu Muslim inter religious marriages (6): Muslims kill a Hindu boy, in Kerala, because he fell in love with a Muslim girl

But where is Times of India, The Hindu and other secular Media? Is it, non-reporting, because secular laws do not apply to Indian Muslims and Islam?

The media either chooses to ignore reporting which sheds true light on Islamic fascism or indulges in blatant lying like they did in the case of Rinkel Kumari. Shame on them.

RULE OF MARRIAGE IN ISLAM:  Islam allows Muslim men to marry Non-Muslim women and to bring their off spring as Muslims. But Islam rejects Muslim women marrying Non-Muslim men and in such cases Islam encourages honor killings or Muslims in accordance with Sharia can harm (or kill) the Non-Muslim person. The consequence of such laws and beliefs in multicultural societies is, in the long term, Non-Muslims and their culture simply disappear.

Similar to Apostasy in Islam in which Islam professes death penalty to Muslims who discard Islam but Islam expects others to convert to Islam and actively engages in proselytizing.

Every rule and belief in Islam is rigged to expand the dominion of Islam.

Every rule and belief in Islam re-enforces the belief of superiority of Muslims and inferiority of Non-Muslims.

Murder of Hindu youth by Jihadi Moral Police, Prime suspect under arrest

Hindu Muslim inter religious marriages ( 5 )

Though the whole post - below - refers to a Christian woman, it is equally applicable to Hindu girls who are married to Muslims. Actually, it is much worse for Hindu girls because Koran gives some leniency to Christians and Jews.

Never mind, Islam is one hell of 'PLURALISM' and full of mercy.

(May be some Hindu girls should know about below rules.)

SOURCE (This is what an Islamic website says.)

QUESTION: Why is it that a catholic girl married to a muslim man CANNOT celebrate her religous festivals? even though she is married to a muslim she still remains a catholic. shouldnt she be able to worship what she belives?.

ANSWER: Praise be to Allaah.

If a Christian girl agrees to marry a Muslim man, then she should be aware of a number of things:

1 – The wife is commanded to obey her husband, so long as it does not involve sin. No differentiation is made between a Muslim wife and a non-Muslim wife with regard to that. If her husband tells her to do something that is not a sin, then she is obliged to obey him. Allaah has given this right to men, because they are in charge of the family and are responsible for it, and family life cannot run smoothly unless one of its members is in charge and is listened to and obeyed. But this does not mean that the man is allowed to dominate or exploit this right in order to mistreat his wife and children, rather he must strive hard to do a good job, to offer sincere advice and consult with them.

But life is not free of matters that need to be settled in a decisive manner. The Christian girl needs to understand this principle before she goes ahead and marries a Muslim.

2 – Islam allows marriage to a Christian or Jewish woman, i.e., it permits a man to marry such a woman whilst she continues to follow her religion. The husband does not have the right to force her to become Muslim, or to stop her worshipping in her own way. But he does have the right to forbid her to go out of the house, even if she is going to go out to go to church, because she is commanded to obey him. He also has the right to forbid her to commit evil openly in the house, such as setting up statues or ringing bells.

That also includes celebrating innovated festivals, such as Easter, because that is an evil action according to Islam, in two ways. It is an innovation for which there is no basis, like celebrating the birthday of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and Mother’s Day, and it also includes false beliefs, namely the belief that the Messiah was killed and crucified, then placed in the grave, then rose from it.

The truth is that ‘Eesa (Jesus – peace be upon him) was not killed or crucified, rather that he was taken up to heaven alive.

See questions no. 10277 and 43148.

The husband does not have the right to force his Christian wife to give up these beliefs, but he may denounce her open profession of falsehood. We have to differentiate between her right to continue following her religion and her manifesting evil deeds openly in his house. An example of that is if the wife is a Muslim but she believes that something is permissible, whereas her husband believes it is haraam. He has the right to stop her doing it, because he is in charge of the family, and he is obliged to denounce whatever he believes is wrong.

3 – The view of the majority of scholars is that the minor issues of sharee’ah are addressed to the kaafirs, as well as the command to believe. This means that things that are forbidden to Muslims are also forbidden to them, such as drinking alcohol, eating pork, introducing innovations or celebrating them. The husband should stop his wife committing any of these actions, because of the general meaning of the verse in which Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“O you who believe! Ward off yourselves and your families against a Fire (Hell) whose fuel is men and stones”

[al-Tahreem 66:6]

Nothing is exempted from that except the beliefs and acts of worship that are prescribed in her religion, such as obligatory prayers and fasts. The husband should not raise any objections to that. Drinking alcohol, eating pork, and celebrating innovated festivals that have been invented by rabbis and priests, are not part of her religion.

Ibn al-Qayyim (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: The husband has the right to stop her going out to the church. This was stated by Imam Ahmad with regard to a man who had a Christian wife. He said: He should not give her permission to go out to Christian festivals or churches.

And he said concerning a man who had a Christian slave woman who asked him to let her go out to attend their festivals and churches and gatherings: He should not give her permission to do that.

Ibn al-Qayyim said: The reason for that is that he should not help her with regard to the means of kufr or give her permission to do that. And he said: He does not have the right to forbid her to observe fasts which she believes are obligatory, even if that means that he misses out on intimacy with her at that time, or to forbid her to pray towards the east in his house. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) allowed the Christians of Najraan to pray in his mosque, facing towards their “qiblah” (direction of prayer). End quote from Ahkaam Ahl al-Dhimmah, 2/819-823.

The fact that the delegation of Christians from Najraan prayed in the mosque of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) was also mentioned by Ibn al-Qayyim (may Allaah have mercy on him) in Zaad al-Ma’aad, 3/629. The commentator said: its men are thiqaat (trustworthy), but it is munqati’ (interrupted) – i.e., its isnaad is da’eef (weak).

See also question no. 3320.

And Allaah knows best.

Hindu-Muslim inter religious marriages ( 4 )

Though I tracked many more tragic cases of Hindu women falling victims in last 3 years, here I am presenting 3 cases, sadly, in one case it ended a girls life.

First, one can read tragic stories from the links I give below:

Case 1. Ritu in West Bengal was stabbed by a Muslim because she refused marriage proposal
Case 2. A Hindu girl in Trivandrum stabbed in her own house
Case 3. A Hindu wife killed by Muslim husband

Two Muslim girls killed by their 'mothers' for marrying Hindu idolaters

These two mothers unfortunately do not understand that Islam allows intereligious marriages, at least according to Muslim moderates like Mr Sultan Shahin or Mr Ali Engineer, who show it as evidence for Islam being pluralist.

Just like the myth of Islam being pluralist and inclusive, their assertions on Islam allowing intereligious marriages is a blatant lie - to be more honest it is half truth -, of which those reformers were never ashamed of; because they knew in their hearts that Allah, Islamic god, perfectly allows telling lies to advance the ultimate goal of Islam i.e. world being ruled under Sharia law.

I needed to be more accurate on position of Islam on inter religious marriages - I mentioned this many times in this blog itself and to many non-Muslims in various discussions at other places - to remove any doubts of readers of this piece.

Let us question whether a religion which prescribes death penalty to those leaving Islam to other religion allows intereligious marriages?

Sure, it does. In its own way!

What ever be the extent to which a Muslim practices his faith, every Muslim believes Koran is a word from Allah revealed to Prophet Mohammad through Anger Gabriel. And Koran says these on inter religious marriages:
1. Muslim men can marry women from people of book i.e. Christians and Jews and of course Muslim women.
2. Muslim women can not marry men from other religions; it is forbidden (haram).

There is a glitch here regarding Islam allowing Muslim men marrying Hindu women or Sikh women. Considering that some Islamic schools (actually, only one school) have extended the option of paying Jizya to Hindus, Buddhists and Sikhs - in the beginning, only Christians and Jews have this option of paying Jizya and for all others Islam gives only choice between death and converting to Islam - this provision of Muslim men marrying women of People of Book i.e. Christians and Jews can be extended to women from Hinduism too on parallel logic. Other than this line of philosophy, there is nothing in Koran or traditions of Prophet Mohammad, that permits Muslim men marrying Hindu women.

With regard to Muslim women, we can say nothing like it because there is not a single verse in Koran like 5:005 - which permits Muslim men to marry women from Christianity and Judaism -  permitting Muslim women marrying other than Muslim men.

Following two are the verses that guide social relations between Muslims and non-Muslims:

2:221 (YUSUFALI): Do not marry unbelieving women (idolaters), until they believe: A slave woman who believes is better than an unbelieving woman, even though she allures you. Nor marry (your girls) to unbelievers until they believe: A man slave who believes is better than an unbeliever, even though he allures you.......... 

5:005 (YUSUF ALI): ......(Lawful unto you in marriage) are (not only) chaste women who are believers, but chaste women among the People of the Book, [Christians and Jews] revealed before your time,- when ye give them their due dowers, and desire chastity, not lewdness, nor secret intrigues if any one rejects faith, fruitless is his work, and in the Hereafter he will be in the ranks of those who have lost (all spiritual good). 

When Koran speaks so straight forward on this, it leaves no room for misinterpretation. Sharia (Islamic law) law advocates death penalty to non-Muslim men who try to marry Muslim women or try to develop any kind of relation with Muslim women (read clause 1 in the chapter @o11.10 from here).

But, what happens when Muslim women do marry non-Muslim men; Islam or Koran or Sharia law says such disobedient women be killed and this usually is discussed under the topic of honor killings in Islam; Sharia law does not punish parents who kill their children under tag of honor [here (this hyper-link is excellent) and here (regarding the incident of Harry Potter actress)) (or read clause 4 in the chapter @o1.2 from here]

Now, one can see the kind of inter religious marriages Islam allows; one can also see how conveniently some Islamic apologists lie or present half truths. 

One does not need to be super intelligent to realize that under this kind of setting, where Muslim men can marry non-Muslim women but Muslim women can not marry non-Muslim men, non-Muslims and their culture (or civilization) disappears in the long run. 

Islam is a closed system and totalitarian (fascist actually); every rule and every law in Islam is patterned to advance Islam and towards realizing Islamic goal of whole world under Sharia.

Mothers accused of honour killings 

{{{

Newlyweds Zahida, 19, and Husna, 26, were strangled when they returned home after marrying men of their own choosing, police officer Anil Kumar Kusan said.

Marriages between Hindus and Muslims are rare in India and are frowned upon by both communities, although there are more instances of inter-religious marriages among the educated urban population.

Across India, many marriages are still arranged by families.

But with the booming economy and more women entering the workforce, such traditions are slowly giving way to love matches.

Centuries-old caste and community barriers still come into play, however, and there has been a spurt in "honour killings" in recent years across northern India.

Zahida and Husna were neighbours in Baghpat, a town in Uttar Pradesh state, when they fell in love with two construction workers.

They eloped and got married last week before returning home to make peace with their families, Kusan said.

The girls belonged to Muslim families and their mothers, both widows, were furious, Kusan said.

Initial investigations showed the mothers helped each other to strangle the girls.

The mothers were unrepentant, saying the girls had brought shame and dishonour to their families, police said.

Earlier this week, India's Supreme Court recommended the death penalty for perpetrators of honour killings, calling the practice barbaric and feudal.........

}}}


Or One can read from Indian Express (here)
{{{
Zahida and Husna sought police protection but SDM sent them home [Why?].......Two Muslim women in an Uttar Pradesh town, 40 km east of Delhi, allegedly killed their daughters because they had eloped and married migrant Bihari Hindu labourers, police said. The victims had sought police protection after they returned to their homes in Baghpat earlier this week, but the subdivisional magistrate sent them home to reconcile with their mothers.

“We killed them because they had brought shame to our community. How could they elope with Hindus? They deserved to die. We have no remorse,” Khatun and Subrato said Friday.

}}}

Imagine the uproar and outrage in the media and the circles of our seculars and liberals - who are also opinion makers - if Hindu women have been killed with statements like Hindu extremism, Hindu imperialism and Hindu bigotry or Hindu communalism! Remember, how the media made Priyanka of Bhopal a celebrity because she married a Muslim guy? Now the question is, are courts going to let those mothers go free because according to Sharia law, the marriage is not only illegal but mothers have right to kill their daughters? What will ulema say? Are they going to call these two mothers as examples for other Muslim women and mothers? Imagine the accusations against police department and Judge for turning over those two Hindu girls to their parents? It would be one hell of an opportunity for every idiot to show their credentials as liberal and secular in this cursed land, India.

Muslim youth:"By virtue of the registration of marriage and conversion certificate, she became my wife."

After conversion she becomes a Muslim - since now, both are Muslims - and Indian courts, maintained to uphold constitution, do not have any right to adjudicate on personal laws of Muslims as India does not have uniform civil code; what more worse could follow is that Hindu girl has to subject herself to judgement based on archaic laws of 7 th century, sharia law. Neither media nor politicians will ever dare to speak on such matters. This must have been the line of reasoning by lawyers on the side of Muslim man. At times, this kind of contradiction of sharia and civility or contradiction of sharia and special marriage act were seen in the past. Based on judgments given by high court judges, my thought was that with Hindus like these, India is not in need of terrorists or extremists from adjoining countries like Bangladesh and Pakistan. Here in this case, girl is simply fortunate and every girl may not find all judges like this judge.

Duped into conversion, woman gets divorce 
{{{
The Delhi High Court has granted divorce to a Hindu girl under the Special Marriage Act, finding truth in her statement that she was fraudulently made to sign papers by a Muslim youth which later turned out to be registration of marriage and conversion certificate into Islam. The girl and the youth were friends. She had taken his help to get membership of a library in Jama Masjid for which he persuaded her to convert to Islam. It was under this pretext that he made her sign and execute certain documents.

"This court does not find any illegality or perversity in the reasoning given by the learned trial court in accepting the case of the respondent (woman) that she had never adopted Islam religion and there was no proper solemnisation of marriage between the parties," Justice Kailash Gambhir said while upholding a trial court's decree of divorce.

Dismissing a petition filed by a man for setting aside the trial court's order, the court rejected his argument that the woman - being an educated person - knew about all the documents she had signed and the registration of marriage was done with her consent in November 2005.

The man later claimed that by virtue of the registration of marriage and conversion certificate, she became his wife.

When the woman discovered the fraudulent act in May 2007, she had approached the trial court for dissolution of the marriage under the Special Marriage Act and the court, in November 2008, had granted divorce to her.
}}}

".....being an educated person - knew about all the documents...". Valid argument but not enough as she does not know how disgusting Islam is and how cruel its Prophet was. Conversion is a tricky one and sufis in India have found out many tricks; one such is Islam is not different from others and one just has to say shahada (3 times) and continue living like they did previously. And there are also material and social benefits as they no longer have to pay jizya and live in humiliation. That first or second generations will not see any drastic changes but 3rd generation will find out that Islam is completely different from other faiths and will act accordingly.

This is what happened in India; at the time of partition, most Muslims are Muslims for name sake and even their names sounded like Hindu names. Precisely to change this, Deobandi has come up.

Note: One can click on label 'hindu muslim marriages' to read more on such marriages. 

Leaflet calling Muslims boys in UK to seduce Sikh girls (Hindu-Muslim inter religious marriages)

The news of leaflet that appeared in UK calling Muslim boys to seduce Sikh girls is very old and goes back to the year 2005. After this the cases of love jihad surfaced in India but media ridiculed Hindu groups branding them as fascists for opposing inter religious marriages saying such marriages create harmony. If opposition to such marriages is criteria for declaring people as fascists, these enlightened people should know that Islam fits in to category of fascism because Koran bans Muslims girls marrying infidel men. Islamic law states that such infidels are put to death. Of course Muslims men can marry Non Muslim women. This Islamic belief and law ensures certain death to infidel cultures and civilizations in the long run. One can read what is in leaflet from here or below where I put it up.

Hindu Muslim inter religious marriages: What an Islamic website says on Hinduism!

Occasionally I do check traffic sources that lead to this blog. I found that one search string that lead to this blog is the topic of Hindu Muslims inter religious marriages or similar sentences. I even came across this from sources of search strings: 'my husband is mulim and im hindu and he fights'. There we go.

Harry potter actress was abused by her family for her friendship with a Non Muslim; Islam is fascist.

What was this young Muslim girl’s, famous for appearance in a popular movie series, crime? She is having a male friend from other faith, that too Hinduism.

I did this subject of honor killing, here, and in that post it is shown that Islam sanctions honor killings i.e. if parents kill their off spring for fear that their children are going against Islamic beliefs like by marrying outside their faith or converting to other religion then they can not be punished. What we have here is another case of typical Islamic imperialist and feudal mindset if not honor killing, and the victim here is Afshan Azad who acted in the role of Padma Patil in Harry Potter series. So, Afshan Azad can be considered lucky.

Hindu-Muslim inter religious marriages! (Video) ( 2 )

Note: I was sent some more links and I am adding them in this post. (Nov., 10th, 2010).

Actually the video is about a Sikh family, living in UK, narrating their experience. This was sent by a friend and asked to be included or added to my earlier post on Hindu Muslim Marriages. But I felt that after watching and listening to this video, I decided to put this up in a separate post, here:

Hindu-Muslim inter religious marriages ( 1 )

I moved the whole post here .

(Here I am disabling the comments too, so people wanting to express their views they can do so there itself.)